17.11.2012 Views

Investigating carotenoid loss after drying and storage of

Investigating carotenoid loss after drying and storage of

Investigating carotenoid loss after drying and storage of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

158<br />

7. Involvement <strong>of</strong> enzymes<br />

Soybean lipoxygenase activity was lower at pH value <strong>of</strong> 6.0 than 7.4 (0.013 against<br />

0.141 mmol conjugated diene.min -1 .mol -1 ). Hence, in presence <strong>of</strong> linoleic acid <strong>and</strong> at pH<br />

6.0, horseradish peroxidase was more efficient to bleach !-carotene than soybean<br />

lipoxygenase (0.037 against 0.020 min -1 respectively) but it was the opposite at pH value<br />

7.4 (0.022 against 0.035 min -1 respectively). To our knowledge this is the first time that<br />

horseradish peroxidase was compared to soybean lipoxygenase for !-carotene oxidation<br />

rate in a buffer medium. This highlights the strong link existing between enzymatic<br />

activity due to pH variation <strong>and</strong> oxidation rate <strong>of</strong> !-carotene. Lipoxygenase has been<br />

demonstrated to be an efficient oxidative agent <strong>of</strong> !-carotene (Wache et al. 2003). This<br />

result further shows that peroxidase could be as equally efficient as !-carotene oxidative<br />

agent.<br />

An interesting observation is that addition <strong>of</strong> H2O2, which is peroxidase’s most usual<br />

substrate, did not significantly increase the cleavage activity compared to the simple<br />

enzyme both at pH 6.0 <strong>and</strong> 7.4 (ANOVA; p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!