Lunenburg Part 2 - Section 5 - Social Vulnerability - August 30.pdf
Lunenburg Part 2 - Section 5 - Social Vulnerability - August 30.pdf
Lunenburg Part 2 - Section 5 - Social Vulnerability - August 30.pdf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
maps of equal or superior quality to computer-generated graphics, even a very simple rendition<br />
using tracing paper placed over a map showing dissemination area boundaries would be<br />
effective. It was the position of this project within the suite of ACAS projects that ultimately<br />
determined the use of an automated geospatial mapping and synthesis approach.<br />
Review of Municipal Planning Policy and Emergency Management<br />
This component of the research involved a document review of the District’s Strategic Plan,<br />
Integrated Community Sustainability Plan, and Economic Development Strategy, as well as<br />
secondary plans for coastal areas in the District. Consultations with emergency management<br />
personnel provided information about emergency management plans. The purpose was to<br />
determine the extent to which considerations of social vulnerability are integrated into municipal<br />
planning and emergency management.<br />
Consultations<br />
The next step in the study’s methodology was to carry out consultations with sources of local<br />
knowledge. This process helped to ensure the inclusion of relevant factors in the index of social<br />
vulnerability, as well as to compensate for weaknesses in the index and provide further local<br />
context. Additionally, consultees provided further insight into municipal planning and emergency<br />
management policy and practice. This type of approach is consistent with the work of Wall and<br />
Marzall, Dolan and Walk, and Ford et al. 21 While most assessments of social vulnerability use<br />
only either a statistical or community-based approach, the use of both approaches in a single<br />
study allows it to benefit from the strengths of each method, while counterbalancing their<br />
weaknesses. 22<br />
This method was important because dissemination areas in rural areas, such as the District of<br />
<strong>Lunenburg</strong>, are quite large, with the result that the index of social vulnerability could not capture<br />
some important local factors. The consultations with knowledgeable local persons provided more<br />
detailed information about how social vulnerability might manifest in rural areas, and the types of<br />
needs that socially vulnerable persons might experience in an extreme weather event.<br />
These consultations were semi-structured in nature, allowing consultees to speak broadly about<br />
their understanding of social vulnerability in <strong>Lunenburg</strong> District. This strategy ensured that<br />
unexpected information would be included in the perspective of local social vulnerability. A list of<br />
questions helped to structure the conversation so that any areas of interest not identified by the<br />
consultees could also be explored.<br />
Selecting Persons to Consult<br />
Persons selected for consultation included the following:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
municipal Councilors, who have knowledge of local decision-making processes and<br />
issues of concern in the community;<br />
municipal planners, who are aware of community demographics and development<br />
patterns;<br />
Community Services, Public Health and Community Health representatives, who are<br />
knowledgeable about health and socioeconomic concerns in the community, and have<br />
direct contact with socially vulnerable persons;<br />
21 Wall and Marzall, 2006.<br />
22 Tapsell et al., 2010. p. 26–27.<br />
9