18.06.2015 Views

Lunenburg Part 2 - Section 5 - Social Vulnerability - August 30.pdf

Lunenburg Part 2 - Section 5 - Social Vulnerability - August 30.pdf

Lunenburg Part 2 - Section 5 - Social Vulnerability - August 30.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

maps of equal or superior quality to computer-generated graphics, even a very simple rendition<br />

using tracing paper placed over a map showing dissemination area boundaries would be<br />

effective. It was the position of this project within the suite of ACAS projects that ultimately<br />

determined the use of an automated geospatial mapping and synthesis approach.<br />

Review of Municipal Planning Policy and Emergency Management<br />

This component of the research involved a document review of the District’s Strategic Plan,<br />

Integrated Community Sustainability Plan, and Economic Development Strategy, as well as<br />

secondary plans for coastal areas in the District. Consultations with emergency management<br />

personnel provided information about emergency management plans. The purpose was to<br />

determine the extent to which considerations of social vulnerability are integrated into municipal<br />

planning and emergency management.<br />

Consultations<br />

The next step in the study’s methodology was to carry out consultations with sources of local<br />

knowledge. This process helped to ensure the inclusion of relevant factors in the index of social<br />

vulnerability, as well as to compensate for weaknesses in the index and provide further local<br />

context. Additionally, consultees provided further insight into municipal planning and emergency<br />

management policy and practice. This type of approach is consistent with the work of Wall and<br />

Marzall, Dolan and Walk, and Ford et al. 21 While most assessments of social vulnerability use<br />

only either a statistical or community-based approach, the use of both approaches in a single<br />

study allows it to benefit from the strengths of each method, while counterbalancing their<br />

weaknesses. 22<br />

This method was important because dissemination areas in rural areas, such as the District of<br />

<strong>Lunenburg</strong>, are quite large, with the result that the index of social vulnerability could not capture<br />

some important local factors. The consultations with knowledgeable local persons provided more<br />

detailed information about how social vulnerability might manifest in rural areas, and the types of<br />

needs that socially vulnerable persons might experience in an extreme weather event.<br />

These consultations were semi-structured in nature, allowing consultees to speak broadly about<br />

their understanding of social vulnerability in <strong>Lunenburg</strong> District. This strategy ensured that<br />

unexpected information would be included in the perspective of local social vulnerability. A list of<br />

questions helped to structure the conversation so that any areas of interest not identified by the<br />

consultees could also be explored.<br />

Selecting Persons to Consult<br />

Persons selected for consultation included the following:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

municipal Councilors, who have knowledge of local decision-making processes and<br />

issues of concern in the community;<br />

municipal planners, who are aware of community demographics and development<br />

patterns;<br />

Community Services, Public Health and Community Health representatives, who are<br />

knowledgeable about health and socioeconomic concerns in the community, and have<br />

direct contact with socially vulnerable persons;<br />

21 Wall and Marzall, 2006.<br />

22 Tapsell et al., 2010. p. 26–27.<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!