18.06.2015 Views

Lunenburg Part 2 - Section 5 - Social Vulnerability - August 30.pdf

Lunenburg Part 2 - Section 5 - Social Vulnerability - August 30.pdf

Lunenburg Part 2 - Section 5 - Social Vulnerability - August 30.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

in health care or mitigating socioeconomic inequalities; rather, its main usefulness is in guiding<br />

the allocation of resources targeted at reducing socioeconomic inequalities in health.<br />

<strong>Social</strong> Determinants of Health in Canadian Emergency Management<br />

Lindsay, J. Emergency Management in Canada: Near Misses and Moving Targets<br />

John Lindsay provides an evaluation of emergency management in Canada. He describes a<br />

number of events that have shaped Canadian emergency management practices, discusses<br />

challenges specific to the Canadian context. He notes that although Canada was a leader in<br />

adopting the population health model in health care, and has continued to make the connection<br />

between the determinants of health and disaster vulnerability, that Canada’s emergency<br />

management system has been slow to identify the importance of considering social vulnerability<br />

when performing risk assessments. He also acknowledges that further research is required to<br />

better understand how the social determinants of health influence vulnerability in different<br />

settings.<br />

Lindsay, John. “The Determinants of Disaster <strong>Vulnerability</strong>: Achieving Sustainable<br />

Mitigation through Population Health.” Natural Hazards 28 (2003): 291-304.<br />

This paper aims to identify common goals between disaster management and health care in<br />

regards to mitigating community vulnerability. He notes that the now well-accepted population<br />

health model identifies many of the same social, economic and physical factors that disaster<br />

management has linked to vulnerability: the same factors that allow people to be healthy also<br />

allow people to cope with disasters. Additionally, disaster impacts are felt primarily in terms of<br />

health, and other community impacts that can reduce population health. Therefore, reduction in<br />

vulnerability through improving socioeconomic conditions will have a positive effect on<br />

population health, not only through the reduction in disaster-related injuries and deaths, but also<br />

by improving the social determinants of health in the community. Similarly, actions to improve<br />

the social determinants of health with also reduce vulnerability to disasters. Lindsay suggests<br />

that the integration of health promotion and disaster vulnerability reduction is a natural step,<br />

citing a long-standing association between health promotion, city planning, community<br />

development, and the environmental movement. He further identifies a role for the health sector<br />

in mediation between economic and environmental interests that sometimes conflict.<br />

Lindsay notes that, in the past, both health care and disaster management as disciplines have<br />

emphasized reactive measures, neglecting the health aspects of pre-event mitigation and postevent<br />

recovery needs.<br />

Enarson, Elaine, and Sara Walsh. Integrating Emergency Management and High-Risk<br />

Populations: Survey Report and Action Recommendations. Canadian Red Cross, 2007.<br />

In a commissioned report for the Canadian Red Cross, scholars from the Brandon University<br />

Department of Applied Disaster and Emergency Studies analyze how, and how well, the needs<br />

and capacities of those most at risk are integrated into emergency management practices in<br />

Canada.<br />

Using a combination of a literature review and consultations with experts, the authors create a<br />

framework for identifying and understanding social vulnerabilities as the population subgroup<br />

level. This study employs a functional limitations approach that considers factors such as<br />

mobility or communication restrictions. The social determinants of health are identified as clear<br />

indicators of social vulnerability in Canada.<br />

83

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!