24.06.2015 Views

ilya_prigogine_isabelle_stengers_alvin_tofflerbookfi-org

ilya_prigogine_isabelle_stengers_alvin_tofflerbookfi-org

ilya_prigogine_isabelle_stengers_alvin_tofflerbookfi-org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ORDER OUT OF CHAOS 110<br />

further and concluded that the balance between oxygen consumption<br />

and heat loss was merely the particular manifestation<br />

of the existence of an indestructible "force" underlying all<br />

phenomena.<br />

This tendency to see natural phenomena as the products of<br />

an underlying reality that remains constant throughout its<br />

transformations is strikingly reminiscent of Kant. Kant's influence<br />

can also be recognized in another idea held by some<br />

physiologists, the distinction between vitalism as philosophical<br />

speculation and the problem of scientific methodology. For<br />

those physiologists, even if there was a "vital" force underlying<br />

the function of living beings, the object of physiology<br />

would nonetheless be purely physicochemical in nature. From<br />

the two points of view mentioned, Kantianism, which ratified<br />

the systematic form taken by mathematical physics during the<br />

eighteenth century, can also be identified as one of the roots of<br />

the renewal of physics in the nineteenth century.9<br />

Helmholtz quite openly acknowledged Kant's influence.<br />

For Helmholtz, the principle of the conservation of energy was<br />

merely the embodiment in physics of the general a priori requirement<br />

on which all science is based-the postulate that<br />

there is a basic invariance underlying natural transformations:<br />

The problem of the sciences is, in the first place, to seek<br />

the laws by which the particular processes of nature may<br />

be referred to, and deduced from, general rules.<br />

We are justified, and indeed impelled in this proceeding,<br />

by the conviction that every change in nature must<br />

have a sufficient cause. The proximate causes to which<br />

we refer phenomena may, in themselves, be either variable<br />

or invariable; in the former case the above conviction<br />

impels us to seek for causes to account for the<br />

change, and thus we proceed until we at length arrive at<br />

final causes which are unchangeable, and which therefore<br />

must, in all cases where the exterior conditions are<br />

the same, produce the same invariable effects. The final<br />

aim of the theoretic natural sciences is therefore to discover<br />

the ultimate and unchangeable causes of natural<br />

phenomena. tO<br />

With the principle of the conservation of energy, the idea of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!