24.06.2015 Views

ilya_prigogine_isabelle_stengers_alvin_tofflerbookfi-org

ilya_prigogine_isabelle_stengers_alvin_tofflerbookfi-org

ilya_prigogine_isabelle_stengers_alvin_tofflerbookfi-org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

205 ORDER THROUGH FLUCTUATIONS<br />

learning from or enlarging their experience and about a population<br />

of primates where each individual is an entanglement of<br />

its own experiences and the traditions of the populations in<br />

which he lives.<br />

We also find that, within anthropology itself, basic choices<br />

must be made between various approaches to collective phenomena.<br />

It is well known, for example, that structural anthropology<br />

privileges those aspects of society where the tools<br />

of logic and finite mathematics can be used, aspects such as<br />

the elementary structures of kinship or the analysis of myths,<br />

whose transformations are often compared to crystalline<br />

growth. Discrete elements are counted and combined. This<br />

contrasts with approaches that analyze evolution in terms of<br />

processes involving large, partially chaotic populations. We<br />

are dealing with two different outlooks and two types of models:<br />

Levi-Strauss defines them respectively as "mechanical"<br />

and "statistical." In the mechanical model "the elements are<br />

of the same scale as the phenomena" and individual behavior<br />

is based on prescriptions referring to the structural <strong>org</strong>anization<br />

of society. The anthropologist makes the logic of this behavior<br />

explicit. The sociologist, on the other hand, works with<br />

statistical models for large populations and defines averages<br />

and thresholds.I7<br />

A society defined entirely in terms of a functional model<br />

would correspond to the Aristotelian idea of natural hierarchy<br />

and order. Each official would perform the duties for which he<br />

has been appointed. These duties would translate at each level<br />

the different aspects of the <strong>org</strong>anization of the society as a<br />

whole. The king gives orders to the architect, the architect to<br />

the contractor, the contractor to the workers. Everywhere a<br />

mastermind is at work. On the contrary, termites and other<br />

social insects seem to approach the "statistical" model. As we<br />

have seen, there seems to be no mastermind behind the construction<br />

of the termites' nest, when interactions among individuals<br />

produce certain types of collective behavior in some<br />

circumstances, but none of these interactions refer to any<br />

global task, being all purely local. Such a description necessarily<br />

implies averages and reintroduces the question of stability<br />

and bifurcations.<br />

Which events will regress, and which arc likely to affect the<br />

whole system? What are the situations of choice, and what are

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!