24.06.2015 Views

ilya_prigogine_isabelle_stengers_alvin_tofflerbookfi-org

ilya_prigogine_isabelle_stengers_alvin_tofflerbookfi-org

ilya_prigogine_isabelle_stengers_alvin_tofflerbookfi-org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ORDER OUT OF CHAOS 302<br />

explicit inside physics the aspects of time he thought science<br />

was neglecting.<br />

Exploring the implications and the coherence of those fundamental<br />

concepts, which appear both scientific and philosophical,<br />

may be risky, but it can be very fruitful in the dialogue<br />

between science and philosophy. Let us illustrate this with<br />

some brief references to Leibniz, Peirce, Whitehead, and Lucretius.<br />

Leibniz introduced the strange concept of monads, noncommunicating<br />

physical entities that have "no windows through<br />

which something can get in or out. " His views have often been<br />

dismissed as mad, and still, as we have seen in Chapter 11, it is<br />

an essential property of all integrable systems that there exist<br />

a transformation that may be described in terms of noninteracting<br />

entities. These entities translate their own initial<br />

state throughout their motion, but at the same time, like monads,<br />

they coexist with all the others in a "preestablished" harmony:<br />

in this representation, the state of each entity, although<br />

perfectly self-determined, reflects the state of the whole system<br />

down to the smallest detail.<br />

All integrable systems thus can be viewed as "monadic" systems.<br />

Conversely, Leibnizian monadology can be translated into<br />

dynamic language: the universe is an integrable system.13<br />

Monadology thus becomes the most consequential formulation<br />

of a universe from which all becoming is eliminated. By<br />

considering Leibniz's efforts to understand the activity of matter,<br />

we can measure the gap that separates the seventeenth<br />

century from our time. The tools were not yet ready; it was<br />

impossible, on the basis of a purely mechanical universe, for<br />

Leibniz to give an account of the activity of matter. Still some<br />

of his ideas, that substance is activity, that the universe is an<br />

interrelated unit, remain with us and are today taking on a new<br />

form.<br />

We regret that we cannot devote sufficient space to the work<br />

of Charles S. Peirce. At least let us cite one remarkable passage:<br />

You have all heard of the dissipation of energy. It is found<br />

that in all transformations of energy a part is converted<br />

into heat and heat is always tending to equalize its tem-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!