24.06.2015 Views

ilya_prigogine_isabelle_stengers_alvin_tofflerbookfi-org

ilya_prigogine_isabelle_stengers_alvin_tofflerbookfi-org

ilya_prigogine_isabelle_stengers_alvin_tofflerbookfi-org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

65 THE IDENTIFICATION OF THE REAL<br />

The Newtonian synthesis is thus a surprise. It is an unexpected,<br />

staggering discovery that the scientific world has commemorated<br />

by making Newton the symbol of modern science.<br />

What is particularly astonishing is that the basic code of nature<br />

appeared to have been cracked in a single creative act.<br />

For a long time this sudden loquaciousness of nature, this<br />

triumph of the English Moses, was a source of intellectual<br />

scandal for continental rationalists. Newton's work was<br />

viewed as a purely empirical discovery that could thus equally<br />

well be empirically disproved. In 1747 Euler, Clairaut, and<br />

dlembert, without doubt some of the greatest scientists of<br />

the time, came to the same conclusion: Newton was wrong. In<br />

order to describe the moon's motion, a more complex mathematical<br />

form must be given to the force of attraction, making it<br />

the sum of two terms. For the following two years, each of<br />

them believed that nature had proved Newton wrong, and this<br />

belief was a source of excitement, not of dismay. Far from considering<br />

Newton's discovery synonymous with physical science<br />

itself, physicists were blithely contemplating dropping it<br />

altogether. Dlembert went so far as to express scruples<br />

about seeking fresh evidence against Newton and giving him<br />

"le coup de pied de l'iine."6<br />

Only one courageous voice against this verdict was raised in<br />

France. In 1748, Buffon wrote:<br />

A physical law is a law only by virtue of the fact that it is<br />

easy to measure, and that the sale it represents is not<br />

only always the same, but is actually unique . ... M.<br />

Clairaut has raised an objection against Newton's system,<br />

but it is at best an objection and must not and cannot<br />

become a principle; an attempt should be ,made to overcome<br />

it and not to turn it into a theory the entire consequences<br />

of which merely rest on a calculation; for, as I<br />

have said, one may represent anything by means of calculation<br />

and achieve nothing; and if it is allowed to add<br />

one or more terms to a physical law such as that of attraction,<br />

we are only adding to arbitrariness instead of representing<br />

reality. 7<br />

Later Buffon was to announce what was to become, although<br />

for only a short time, the research program for chemistry:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!