24.06.2015 Views

ilya_prigogine_isabelle_stengers_alvin_tofflerbookfi-org

ilya_prigogine_isabelle_stengers_alvin_tofflerbookfi-org

ilya_prigogine_isabelle_stengers_alvin_tofflerbookfi-org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

51 THE TRIUMPH OF REASON<br />

everything that goes to make up the texture of nature, such as<br />

its perfumes and its colors. The debasement of nature is parallel<br />

to the glorification of all that eludes it, God and man.<br />

The Limits of Classical Science<br />

We have tried to describe the unique historical situation in<br />

which scientific practice and metaphysical conviction were<br />

closely coupled. Galileo and those who came after him raised<br />

the same problems as the medieval builders but broke away<br />

from their empirical knowledge to assert, with the help of<br />

God, the simplicity of the world and the universality of the<br />

language the experimental method postulated and deciphered.<br />

In this way, the basic myth underlying modern science can be<br />

seen as a product of the peculiar complex which, at the close<br />

of the Middle Ages, set up conditions of resonance and reciprocal<br />

amplification among economic, political, social, religious,<br />

philosophic, and technical factors. However, the rapid<br />

decomposition of this complex left classical science stranded<br />

and isolated in a transformed culture.<br />

Classical science was born in a culture dominated by the<br />

alliance between man, situated midway between the divine<br />

order and the natural order, and God, the rational and intelligible<br />

legislator, the sovereign architect we have conceived in our<br />

own image. It has outlived this moment of cultural consonance<br />

that entitled philosophers and theologians to engage in science<br />

and that entitled scientists to decipher and express opinions<br />

on the divine wisdom and power at work in creation. With the<br />

support of religion and philosophy, scientists had come to believe<br />

their enterprise was self-sufficient, that it exhausted the<br />

possibilities of a rational approach to natural phenomena. The<br />

relationship between scientific description and natural philosophy<br />

did not, in this sense, have to be justified. It could be<br />

seen as self-evident that science and philosophy were convergent<br />

and that science was discovering the principles of an<br />

authentic natural philosophy. But, oddly enough, the selfsufficiency<br />

experienced by scientists was to outlive the departure<br />

of the medieval God and the withdrawal of the epistemological<br />

guarantee offered by theology. The originally bold bet had become<br />

the triumphant science of the eighteenth century, 26 the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!