26.06.2015 Views

url?sa=t&source=web&cd=4&ved=0CCAQFjAD&url=http://data.ulis.vnu.edu.vn/jspui/bitstream/123456789/1966/1/54_1405152974

url?sa=t&source=web&cd=4&ved=0CCAQFjAD&url=http://data.ulis.vnu.edu.vn/jspui/bitstream/123456789/1966/1/54_1405152974

url?sa=t&source=web&cd=4&ved=0CCAQFjAD&url=http://data.ulis.vnu.edu.vn/jspui/bitstream/123456789/1966/1/54_1405152974

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

vowels are [−compact] ([−comp]). The feature is replaced by low in Chomsky<br />

and Halle’s system (see Chomskyan).<br />

comparative (adj.) (1) A term used to characterize a major branch of linguistics,<br />

in which the primary concern is to make statements comparing the characteristics<br />

of different languages (dialects, varieties, etc.), or different historical<br />

states of a language. During the nineteenth century, the concern for comparative<br />

analysis was exclusively historical, as scholars investigated the relationships<br />

between such families of languages as Sanskrit, Greek, Latin, their hypothetical<br />

antecedents (i.e. the proto-language from which such families developed), and<br />

the subsequent processes which led to the formation of the language groups of<br />

the present day. This study became known as comparative philology (or simply<br />

philology) – sometimes as comparative grammar. The phrase comparative<br />

method refers to the standard comparative philological technique of comparing<br />

a set of forms taken from cognate languages in order to determine whether a<br />

historical relationship connects them. If there were such a relationship, this<br />

analysis would then be used to d<strong>edu</strong>ce the characteristics of the ancestor language<br />

from which they were assumed to have derived (a process of ‘comparative’<br />

or ‘internal’ reconstruction).<br />

Early twentieth-century linguistics switched from a diachronic to a synchronic<br />

emphasis in language analysis, and, while not excluding historical studies,<br />

comparative linguistics these days is generally taken up with the theoretical and<br />

practical analysis of the structural correspondences between living languages,<br />

regardless of their history, with the aim of establishing general types of language<br />

(‘typological comparison’, or ‘typological linguistics’) and ultimately the universal<br />

characteristics of human language.<br />

(2) A term used in the three-way grammatical description of adjectives and<br />

adverbs into degrees (comparison), specifying the extent of their application;<br />

often abbreviated as comp. The comparative form is used for a comparison<br />

between two entities, and contrasts with superlative, for more than two, and<br />

positive, where no comparison is implied. In English, there is both an inflection<br />

(-er) and a periphrastic construction (more) to express this notion<br />

(e.g. nicer, more beautiful). The construction which may follow the use of a<br />

comparative is called a comparative clause or comparative sentence, e.g. He is<br />

bigger than I am.<br />

comparative linguistics see comparative (1)<br />

comparative method see comparative (1)<br />

compensatory lengthening 91<br />

comparative philology<br />

see comparative (1), philology<br />

comparative reconstruction<br />

see comparative (1), reconstruction<br />

comparison (n.) see comparative (2)<br />

compensatory lengthening In phonology, an effect in which the deletion<br />

of one segment is accompanied by an increase in the length of another,<br />

usually adjacent to it, thus preserving syllable weight. Typically, a vowel is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!