26.06.2015 Views

url?sa=t&source=web&cd=4&ved=0CCAQFjAD&url=http://data.ulis.vnu.edu.vn/jspui/bitstream/123456789/1966/1/54_1405152974

url?sa=t&source=web&cd=4&ved=0CCAQFjAD&url=http://data.ulis.vnu.edu.vn/jspui/bitstream/123456789/1966/1/54_1405152974

url?sa=t&source=web&cd=4&ved=0CCAQFjAD&url=http://data.ulis.vnu.edu.vn/jspui/bitstream/123456789/1966/1/54_1405152974

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

66 caregiver/caretaker speech<br />

VOWELS<br />

Close<br />

Front<br />

÷ y<br />

Central<br />

÷ Í<br />

iy<br />

ä<br />

Back<br />

„ u<br />

Close-mid<br />

e<br />

ø<br />

” o<br />

v<br />

¬<br />

Open-mid<br />

y<br />

Î Ñ<br />

Œ<br />

Open<br />

Ò<br />

æ<br />

a<br />

Ω<br />

w ∞<br />

positions more accurately, e.g. a plus beneath the vowel means that the articulation<br />

is more advanced than the cardinal value (as in [u +<br />

]), a line beneath the<br />

vowel means that the articulation is more retracted (as in [e −<br />

]).<br />

Several other suggestions have been made concerning the best way of dividing<br />

up the vowel articulation area, but Daniel Jones’s system is still the most widely<br />

used. Where symbols appear in pairs, the one to the right represents a rounded<br />

vowel.<br />

caregiver/caretaker speech<br />

see motherese<br />

Cartesian linguistics A term used by some linguists to refer to any linguistic<br />

theories or methods which, it is claimed, illustrate the influence of the French<br />

philosopher René Descartes (1596–1650) and the grammarians of Port Royal.<br />

The discussion of universals in generative linguistics, in particular, draws<br />

certain parallels with Cartesian views concerning the relationship between language<br />

and thought. This interpretation of the history of linguistic thought has<br />

remained controversial, since its initial statement by Noam Chomsky (see Language<br />

and Mind (1968)). See also Chomskyan.<br />

case (n.) (1) A grammatical category used in the analysis of word-classes<br />

(or their associated phrases) to identify the syntactic relationship between<br />

words in a sentence, through such contrasts as nominative, accusative, etc.<br />

The traditional classification, such as is found in Latin grammar, is based<br />

on variations in the morphological forms of the word (a set of such forms<br />

constituting a paradigm, as in Latin puella, puellam, puellae, puella, the singular<br />

case forms of ‘girl’ – respectively nominative/vocative, accusative, genitive/<br />

dative and ablative). Each form is analysed in terms of a specific range of<br />

meaning; e.g. nominative is primarily the case of the grammatical subject of the<br />

sentence, genitive refers to such notions as possession, origin, and so on.<br />

In languages which lack morphological variations of this kind, the term ‘case’,<br />

as traditionally used, does not apply. In English, for example, the only case form<br />

which is so marked is the genitive (as in boy’s or boys’); all other forms have<br />

no ending, the remaining case ‘meanings’ being expressed using prepositions<br />

(as in with a boy, to the boy) or word-order (as in the cat chases mouse/mouse<br />

chases cat contrast). A great deal of space in introductions to linguistics has

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!