26.06.2015 Views

url?sa=t&source=web&cd=4&ved=0CCAQFjAD&url=http://data.ulis.vnu.edu.vn/jspui/bitstream/123456789/1966/1/54_1405152974

url?sa=t&source=web&cd=4&ved=0CCAQFjAD&url=http://data.ulis.vnu.edu.vn/jspui/bitstream/123456789/1966/1/54_1405152974

url?sa=t&source=web&cd=4&ved=0CCAQFjAD&url=http://data.ulis.vnu.edu.vn/jspui/bitstream/123456789/1966/1/54_1405152974

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

S<br />

S′ An abbreviation used in generative grammar for a clause introduced by<br />

a subordinating conjunction or complementizer. In government-binding<br />

theory, it is assumed that such clauses are headed by the complementizer,<br />

and hence they are labelled CP (see cp).<br />

SAAD An abbreviation sometimes used to refer to the kernel sentences generated<br />

by a grammar – standing for simple–active–affirmative–declarative.<br />

sandhi /csandip/ (adj./n.) A term used in syntax and morphology to refer to<br />

the phonological modification of grammatical forms which have been<br />

juxtaposed. The term comes from a Sanskrit word meaning ‘joining’. Sandhi<br />

forms are forms which have undergone specific modifications in specific circumstances<br />

(i.e. various sandhi rules have applied). assimilation and dissimilation<br />

are two widespread tendencies which could be classified under this heading.<br />

The merit of the sandhi notion is that it can be used as a very general term<br />

within which can be placed a wide range of structural tendencies that otherwise<br />

it would be difficult to interrelate. In languages where sandhi forms are complex,<br />

a distinction is sometimes made between external sandhi (sandhi rules<br />

which operate across word boundaries) and internal sandhi (rules which operate<br />

within words). See also tone.<br />

Sapir–Whorf hypothesis A theory of the relationship between language and<br />

thought expounded in its most explicit form by the American anthropological<br />

linguists Edward Sapir (1884–1939) and Benjamin Lee Whorf (1897–<br />

1941). Also known as the theory of linguistic relativity, the hypothesis<br />

states (in the words of Whorf) that ‘we dissect nature along lines laid down by<br />

our native languages . . . by the linguistic systems in our minds.’ The differences<br />

in world-view imposed by different languages have, however, proved extremely<br />

difficult to elucidate or test experimentally, and the fact of successful bilingual<br />

translation weakens the force of the theory’s claims; as a result, the Sapir–<br />

Whorf hypothesis has made little impact on contemporary psycholinguistics,<br />

though the 1990s saw a renewed interest from cognitive psycholinguists and<br />

others.<br />

A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics 6th Edition. David Crystal<br />

© 2008 David Crystal. ISBN: 978-1-405-15296-9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!