Gardens at the University of Plymouth are being opened for environmental teachingand learning over recent years. Yet there is potential for confusionamongst those coming to it for the first time, given all the lists of keyconcepts, values and skills that various writers and bodies suggestare essential in learning for sustainable development. 5I would suggest that the newly interested policymaker or practitionerlook for commonality between the various frameworks,regarding them as indicative rather than prescriptive. They are thereto be used, edited, critically discussed and adapted as part of thelearning process, rather than adopted wholesale.Whilst lists of sustainability-related concepts, skills and values arebeneficial, at a more fundamental level, it is the change of perspectiveand learning culture which is key in order to move us away fromthe perspectives and culture that have supported unsustainability.In terms of educational practices, it means that curriculum designersand teachers develop learning situations where the potential fortransformative learning experiences, both for themselves and theirstudents, is made more likely. In essence, this shift can be expressedin terms of eight key questions that can help unlock thinking whenconsidering any issue:Holistic: “how does this relate to that?”, “what is the larger context here?”Critical: “why are things this way, in whose interests?”Appreciative: “what’s good, and what already works well here?”Inclusive: “who/what is being heard, listened to and engaged?”Systemic: “what are or might be the consequences of this?”Creative: “what innovation might be required?”Image: University of PlymouthEthical: “how should this relate to that?”, “what is wiseaction?”, “how can we work towards the inclusivewell-being of the whole system – social, economic andecological?”Practical: “how do we take this forward with sustainabilityin mind as our guiding principle?”Such learning will ideally be reflexive, experiential, inquiring,experimental, participative, iterative, real-world andaction-oriented. The sustainability learner will be characterizedby such qualities as resilience, resourcefulness,creativity, systemic and critical thinking, enterprise, cooperationand care. What is required is ‘learning as change’in the active pursuit of sustainability and in the design,development and maintenance of ecologically sustainableeconomic and social systems through changed lifestylesand innovation. Such engaged learning goes beyond mere‘learning about change’ or preparative ‘learning for change’which may be seen as rather more passive steps on the wayto a deeper learning response.This may sound far from the realities of everydayeducational practice, but experience in the UK, forexample, shows a rapid increase in interest and activityaround sustainability education and learning in recentyears. Thus, while there is still a long way to go in thehigher education sector, many universities – spurredon by funding council policies (not least relating tocarbon management) and increasing demand froman engaged student body – are recognizing sustainabilityas an imperative that needs a whole-institutionresponse. This has been supported strongly by suchorganizations as the Higher Education Academy 6and the Environmental Association for Universitiesand Colleges, 7 which play an important facilitativerole in developing and energizing networks of keyinstitutions and individuals, undertaking researchand spreading good practice. At the the same time,lead institutions are pushing the pace of change forthe sector as a whole. This includes the University ofPlymouth, where the whole-institution programmeworking on Campus, Curriculum, Community andCulture over the last five years now sees sustainabilitylinked strongly to enterprise as the touchstones of theuniversity’s identity and work. 8Last chance to make a differenceThe UK Future Leaders Survey 2007/08, which interviewedsome 25,000 young people in the UK, makesit clear that they are “intensely aware of the big challengesfacing the planet”, but also notes that they arethe last generation with a chance to put things ona more sustainable course. Given this critical challenge,learning for sustainable development nowneeds to be absolutely central to educational policyand practice and enmeshed with all other agendas.As a recent UK report on education for sustainabledevelopment in the UK shows, 9 at this point, we canbe cautiously optimistic – but the unsustainabilityclock is still ticking.[ 33 ]
Sustainable school feedingNancy Walters, Chief, School Feeding Policy Division, World Food ProgrammeCurrently an estimated 66 million children attend schoolhungry – about 40 per cent of them in Africa – andan additional 72 million children in this age group donot attend school at all. As the leading humanitarian agencyin the fight against hunger, the World Food Programme (WFP)has been supporting educational development through schoolfeeding programmes for over 45 years. Through partnershipswith both the public and private sector, 22 million children in63 countries benefited from WFP’s school feeding programmesin 2009. Of these, 10.5 million were in 37 African countries.Food security and nutrition play an important role in educationaldevelopment. School feeding offers an incentive for households tosend their children to school to receive an education, while alsoreducing short-term hunger and improving their nutrition andhealth. Evidence has shown that where there is a social safety netthat addresses food security and nutrition to school children, accessto education increases and educational performance improves.Over the last year, WFP has revised its school feeding policy tofocus on sustainability. In the past, WFP very often implementedschool feeding as a stand-alone intervention, with little planningfor national ownership. WFP, governments and other partnershave recognized the potential of school feeding as part of a holisticnational development strategy and have shifted the school feedingparadigm to focus on sustainability and national ownership. Since2008, the World Bank and WFP have been working together to helpcounties transition and develop the capacity for sustainable schoolfeeding programmes. A 2009 joint publication by the World Bankand WFP, titled Rethinking School Feeding: Social Safety Nets, ChildDevelopment, and the Education Sector, provides a road map for countriesof the costs and benefits of implementing sustainable schoolfeeding programmes, in the context of a productive safety net and afiscally sustainable investment in human capital.The strength of school feeding as an educational tool is its longterminvestment in human capital by achieving multi-sector benefitsin nutrition, education, value transfer, gender equality and widersocio-economic gains. By investing in the health and nutrition ofschool-age children, a country can increase the human capital of itsyounger generation and achieve sustainable economic growth andhuman development. The combination of multiple benefits with theshift in the school feeding paradigm makes significant contributionsin building sustainability.The multiple benefits of sustainable school feedingSchool feeding programmes are much more than simply giving foodto people in need. Solid empirical evidence of the impact of schoolfeeding programmes on educational outcomes proves that schoolfeeding increases school enrolment and attendance by reducingschool drop-out rates. 1,2,3 There is also significant evidence thatproves school feeding goes beyond the educationaloutcomes, producing an array of benefits across disciplines.The productive safety-net function providedthrough its multiple benefits in education, nutritionand gender is well known. Innovative school feedingprogrammes provide multi-sector benefits such aseducation, improved environment, gender equality,food security, poverty alleviation, nutrition and health– in one single intervention. School feeding is an investmentin human capital, which yields returns in terms ofglobal stability and building a sustainable world.Food security and nutrition: enabling aspects of educationFood security and nutrition play critical roles in educationand human development. Empirical evidenceshows that good nutrition is a prerequisite for effectivelearning. The interdependent linkages betweencaloric intake, nutrition and cognitive and physicaldevelopment are overwhelming. School feeding is anintervention that enhances the diet and increases theenergy available to a child. It targets micronutrientdeficiencies, which are widespread among school-agechildren in developing countries and which increasesusceptibility to infection, leading to absenteeismand impairing learning capacity and cognition. 4,5,6,7Improving micronutrient status through food fortificationor micronutrient powders, particularly ofiron, B-vitamins, vitamin A and iodine, contributesdirectly to enhanced cognition and learning capacity.Recent studies in Kenya and Uganda proved that bothin-school meals and take-home rations (THR) reduceanaemia prevalence. 8,9There exists a large body of literature that demonstratesa systematic link between physical trauma andspecific cognitive and learning deficits. 10 For instance,stunting, which is typically caused by malnutrition andinsufficient caloric intake, has been found to be associatedwith reduced cognitive skills and slower progressin school as a child, as well as reduced earnings as anadult. 11 Food and nutrition security are the key ingredientsor even the enabling aspects of educationaldevelopment. Nutritious foods provide children withthe capability to function in the classroom.Gender, orphans and vulnerable childrenIt has been proved that school feeding contributes toimproved education for girls, as both in-school mealsand THR are effective in targeting gender objectives.This is particularly useful in boosting girls’ enrolment[ 34 ]
- Page 1 and 2: TOMORROW TODAYUnited NationsEducati
- Page 9: THE HONOURABLE DIANE MCGIFFORD, CHA
- Page 15 and 16: ANNA TIBAIJUKA, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR,
- Page 17: KONRAD OSTERWALDER, RECTOR, UNITED
- Page 25 and 26: Image: Lyle BenkoMid-Decade Assembl
- Page 28 and 29: levels, and is an efficient mechani
- Page 32: levels of education, taking part in
- Page 37 and 38: Image: WFP/Rein SkullerudImage: WFP
- Page 39 and 40: How the Education for Rural People
- Page 41 and 42: Image: FAOThe Education for Rural P
- Page 43 and 44: Education for sustainable citiesTra
- Page 45 and 46: Image: UN-HABITATChild washing hand
- Page 47: sustainable land management practic
- Page 52: Image: Inpyoung Elementary SchoolIm
- Page 55 and 56: Reaching young people with sexual a
- Page 58 and 59: Image: © BBC World Service Trust 2
- Page 62 and 63: Image: Nat. Comm. UNESCO ChinaThe S
- Page 64 and 65: Image: Japanese Nat. Comm. for UNES
- Page 66: in July 2005, the RCE network has c
- Page 69 and 70: Image: SEAMEO RIHEDThe third meetin
- Page 71 and 72: Image: CEEImage: CEEYoung graduates
- Page 73 and 74: Developing informed fishingcommunit
- Page 75 and 76: Image: S Jayaraj, BOBP-IGOImage: S
- Page 77 and 78: Let’s take care of the planet:edu
- Page 79 and 80: Image: Ministry of Education, Brazi
- Page 82 and 83: ten provinces and three territories
- Page 84 and 85:
provide tools and materials to supp
- Page 86 and 87:
• Projects for senior citizens, w
- Page 88 and 89:
From activists to the inclusion of
- Page 90 and 91:
Sweden’s pioneering role ineducat
- Page 92 and 93:
• Exposure to Swedish and interna
- Page 94 and 95:
To strengthen ESD work in the Nordi
- Page 96 and 97:
From personally relevant experience
- Page 98 and 99:
Image: © Peter PurgBBCC members at
- Page 100 and 101:
Beyond boundaries: implementing edu
- Page 102 and 103:
Hurricane Gustav over the Caribbean
- Page 104 and 105:
the first thirty years of the life
- Page 106:
Image: NIE, SingaporeThe purpose-bu
- Page 109 and 110:
Image: USM(ii) Alternative universi
- Page 111 and 112:
Citizenship Project brings sustaina
- Page 113:
During the workshop, the undergradu
- Page 117 and 118:
GLE research campImage: GLOBE Thail
- Page 119 and 120:
Minister. This is a step towards en
- Page 121 and 122:
Caring for people through education
- Page 124 and 125:
Politics and civil society in the U
- Page 126 and 127:
National Committee in three ways. F
- Page 128 and 129:
critically highly skilled human res
- Page 130 and 131:
Child rights and equity throughclim
- Page 132 and 133:
Image: © UNICEF/NYHQ2007-1390/Giac
- Page 134 and 135:
Perspectives on higher education fo
- Page 136 and 137:
Image: © RCE Graz-StyriaSignboard
- Page 138 and 139:
African higher education networking
- Page 140:
Collaborative links within an RCESo
- Page 143 and 144:
Image: © RCE ZombaImage: UNU-IASSt
- Page 145 and 146:
esearchers from developing countrie
- Page 147 and 148:
Change for a better world:assessing
- Page 149 and 150:
Learning for change: the key to a s
- Page 151 and 152:
Curriculum and Instruction: Interna
- Page 153 and 154:
identified. 8 These agents of chang
- Page 155 and 156:
Turning today’s youth into tomorr
- Page 157 and 158:
and implementation is based on an i
- Page 159 and 160:
Image: Paulo Freire InstituteSeeds
- Page 161 and 162:
Helping people take control of thei
- Page 163 and 164:
Sihuan, China - Bio-digestors addre
- Page 165 and 166:
of ‘sustainability’ that is mos
- Page 167 and 168:
Entrepreneurship as thefishing rod
- Page 169 and 170:
Image: GET’10 in East AfricaImage
- Page 171 and 172:
WikiQuESD authoring and learning pl
- Page 173 and 174:
Transforming childhood: from reinfo
- Page 175 and 176:
Young students plant a vegetable ga
- Page 177:
Image: © UNESCO/Katy AnisEducation
- Page 180 and 181:
Democratizing education:the quantit
- Page 182 and 183:
Image: FLAMEThe quality of college
- Page 184 and 185:
The foundations of ESDin early chil
- Page 186:
Free-range ecological hens, indoors
- Page 189 and 190:
Waste in and around schoolscommunit
- Page 191 and 192:
Promoting education for sustainable
- Page 193 and 194:
of Education for Sustainable Develo