09.07.2015 Views

CPG for Eating Disorders

CPG for Eating Disorders

CPG for Eating Disorders

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Variable: reduction / remission of binge-eating and purgingThere is insufficient evidence to determine that there are clinically significantdifferences between SH and GSH in the remission of binge-eating by the end oftreatment (1 RCT, N=40; Loeb, 2000 260 ; RR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.42 to1.21).There is limited evidence to determine that GSH is superior to SH in reducing thefrequency of binge-eating by the end of treatment (2 RCTs, N=109; Loeb, 2000 260 ;Carter,1998 261 ; SMD: -0.48; 95% CI: -0.86 to -0.09).There is insufficient evidence to determine that there are clinically significantdifferences between SH and GSH in the frequency of binge-eating at post-treatmentfollow-up (1 RCT, N=69; Carter, 1998 261 ; SMD: -0.24; 95% CI: -0.71 to 0.23).RCT1++RCT1++RCT1++Variables: depression and/or interpersonal and psychosocial functioning and/orgeneral psychiatric symptomsThere is insufficient evidence to determine that there are clinically significantdifferences between SH and GSH in depression scores by the end of treatment (1 RCT,N=40; Loeb, 2000 260 ; SMD: -0.22; 95% CI: -0.85 to 0.40).There is insufficient evidence to determine that there are clinically significantdifferences between SH and GSH in general psychiatric symptoms by the end oftreatment (2 RCTs, N=109; Loeb, 2000 260 ; Carter, 1998 261 ; SMD: -0.18; 95% CI: -0.55to 0.20) and at follow-up (1 RCT, N=69; Carter, 1998 261 ; SMD: -0.20; 95% CI: -0.68 to0.27).RCT1++RCT1++More resultsIn an RCT (Peterson, 1998; USA 256 ) SH administered by a therapist (G1) was comparedto partial SH (G2), structured SH (G3) and wait-list (G4) in 61 patients with BED. G1used group discussion and the psychoeducational component; in G2, participantswatched a 30-minute psychoeducational video and later engaged in a group discussionwith the therapist, and in G3 participants watched the 30-minute video and discussed itamongst themselves. All treated groups obtained better results than the control group inremission and frequency of binge-eating and symptoms related with eating disorders.Abstinence proportion (complete remission) was 68% to 87% in the treated groups and12.5% in the control group. There were no differences amongst groups in terms ofdepression and BMI.In an RCT (Peterson, 2001; USA) 255 SH administered by a therapist (G1) was comparedto partial SH (G2) and structured SH (G3) in 61 patients with BED. The three groupsshowed significant improvement in remission, binge-eating frequency and bodydissatisfaction. The SH group obtained greater remission by the end of treatment, butnot at follow-up. There were no differences amongst groups in terms of depression andBMI.RCT1+RCT1+115CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE FOR EATING DISORDERS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!