09.07.2015 Views

CPG for Eating Disorders

CPG for Eating Disorders

CPG for Eating Disorders

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

There is strong evidence that antidepressant treatment (fluoxetine, desipramine,phenelzine [withdrawn from the Spanish market], trazodone, bupropion) is superior toplacebo in clinical improvement (defined as reducing binge-eating by at least 50%) (6RCTs; N=855; Mc Cann, 1990 262 ; Walsh, 1991 286 ; Goldstein, 1995 287 ; Walsh, 1987 288 ;Horne, 1988 289 ; Pope, 1989 290 ; RR: 0.68; 95% CI:0.60 to 0.78; NNT: 5; 95% CI: 4 to 8).There is insufficient evidence to determine if there is a clinically significant differencebetween antidepressants (fluoxetine, desipramine, phenelzine [withdrawn from theSpanish market], trazodone, bupropion) and placebo in reducing the frequency of bingeeating(6 RCTs; N=290; McCann, 1990 262 ; Walsh, 1991 286 ; Walsh, 1987 288 ; Pope, 1989 290 ;Mitchell, 2001 258 ; Carruba, 2001 291 ; random effects model SMD: -0.33; 95% CI: -1.13 to0.47) and purging by the end of treatment (3 RCTs; N=198; Walsh, 1991 286 ; Pope1989 290 ; Mitchell, 2001 258 ; SMD: -0.19; 95% CI: -0.66 to 0.28).There is limited evidence to determine that MAOI treatment (phenelzine, [withdrawnfrom the Spanish market]) is superior to placebo in the remission of binge-eating andpurging by the end of treatment (1 RCT; N=62; Walsh, 1987 288 ; RR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.62to 0.95; NNT: 5; 95% CI: 3 to 17).There is insufficient evidence to determine if there is a clinically significant differencebetween SSRI antidepressants (fluoxetine) and placebo in reducing the frequency ofbinge-eating (SMD: -0.30; 95% CI: -0.91 to 0.31) and purging (SMD: -0.56; 95% CI: -1.17 to 0.06) by the end of treatment according to 1 RCT (N=43; Kanerva, 2001) 285 .There is insufficient evidence to determine if there is a clinically significant differencebetween tricyclic antidepressants (desipramine) and placebo in reducing the frequency ofpurging (1 RCT; N=78; Walsh, 1991 286 ; SMD: -0.34; 95% CI: -0.79 to 0.11) by the endof treatment.There is strong evidence to determine that SSRI antidepressant treatment (fluoxetine) issuperior to placebo in reducing binge-eating (3 RCTs; N= 706; Goldstein, 1995 287 ;Kanerva, 1994 285 , Fluoxetine Bulimia Nervosa Collaborative Study Group, 1992 292 ; RR:0.73; 95% CI: 0.62 to 0.84; NNT: 6; 95% CI: 5 to 12) and purging by at least 50% by theend of treatment (2 RCTs; N=656; Goldstein, 1995 287 , Fluoxetine Bulimia NervosaCollaborative Study Group, 1992 292 ; RR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.57 to 0.76; NNT: 5; 95% CI: 4to 7).There is strong evidence to determine that tricyclic antidepressant treatment(imipramine) is superior to placebo in terms of clinical improvement (defined asreducing binge-eating by at least 50%) by the end of treatment (1 RCT; N=22; Pope,1983 293 ; RR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.11 to 0.80; NNT: 2; 95% CI: 2 to 4).There is strong evidence to determine that tricyclic antidepressants (imipramine,desipramine) vs. placebo decrease the frequency of binge-eating by the end of treatment(3 RCTs; N=120; Pope, 1983 293 ; McCann, 1990 262 ; Walsh, 1991 286 ; SMD:-0.82; 95% CI: -1.20 to -0.45).RCT1++RCT1++RCT1++RCT1++RCT1++RCT1++RCT1++RCT1++142CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE FOR EATING DISORDERS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!