10.07.2015 Views

Untitled - socium.ge

Untitled - socium.ge

Untitled - socium.ge

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

142 Steve WoolgarSurveillance and Privacy at Work,” in S. Woolgar (ed.), Virtual Society?Technology, Cyberbole, Reality, pp. 137–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Miller, D. and Slater, D. (2000) The Internet: An Ethnographic Approach. Oxford:Berg.Nettleton, S., Pleace, N., Burrows, R., Muncer, S., and Loader, B. (2002) “The Realityof Virtual Social Support,” in S. Woolgar (ed.), Virtual Society? Technology,Cyberbole, Reality, pp. 176–88. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Schiller, D. (2000) Digital Capitalism: Networking the Global Market System.Cambrid<strong>ge</strong>, MA: MIT Press.Shove, E. and Rip, A. (2000) “Users and Unicorns: A Discussion of Mythical Beasts inInteractive Science,” Science and Public Policy, 27 (3): 175–82.Smith, M. A. and Kollock, P. (eds) (1999) Communities in Cyberspace. London:Routled<strong>ge</strong>.Star, S. L. and Griesmer, J. (1989) “Institutional Ecology, Translations and Coherence:Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology,1907–1939,” Social Studies of Science, 19: 387–420.Swann, G. M. P. and Watts, T. (2002) “Visualisation Needs Vision: The Pre-paradigmaticCharacter of Virtual Reality,” in S. Woolgar (ed.), Virtual Society?Technology, Cyberbole, Reality, pp. 41–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Toulouse, C. and Luke, T. W. (eds) (1998) The Politics of Cyberspace. London:Routled<strong>ge</strong>.Watt, S. E., Lea, M., and Spears, R. (2002) “How Social is Internet Communication?A Reappraisal of Bandwidth and Anonymity Effects,” in S. Woolgar (ed.), VirtualSociety? Technology, Cyberbole, Reality, pp. 61–77. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.Wellman, B. (2003) “The Mobilized Society in Theory and Practice,” paper presentedto the iCS/OII conference, Oxford, September 17–20.—— and Gulia, M. (1999) “Virtual Communities as Communities: Net Surfers Don’tRide Alone,” in M. A. Smith and P. Kollock (eds), Communities in Cyberspace, pp.167–94. London: Routled<strong>ge</strong>.Wittel, A., Lury, C., and Lash, S. (2002) “Real and Virtual Connectivity: New Mediain London,” in S. Woolgar (ed.), Virtual Society? Technology, Cyberbole, Reality,pp. 189–208. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Woolgar, S. (1999) “Analytic Scepticism,” in W. D. Dutton (ed.), Society on the Line:Information Politics in the Digital A<strong>ge</strong>, pp. 335–7. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.—— (2000) “The Social Basis of Interactive Social Science,” Science and PublicPolicy, 27 (3): 165–73.—— (2002) “Five Rules of Virtuality,” in S. Woolgar (ed.), Virtual Society?Technology, Cyberbole, Reality, pp. 1–22. Oxford: Oxford University Press.–— and Cooper, G. (1999) “Do Artefacts Have Ambivalence? Moses’ Brid<strong>ge</strong>s,Winner’s Brid<strong>ge</strong>s and Other Urban Le<strong>ge</strong>nds,” Social Studies of Science 29 (3):433–49.Wyatt, S., Thomas, G., and Terranova, T. (2002) “They Came, They Surfed, They WentBack to the Beach: Conceptualizing Use and Non-use of the Internet,” in S.Woolgar (ed.), Virtual Society? Technology, Cyberbole, Reality, pp. 23–40. Oxford:Oxford University Press.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!