Untitled - socium.ge

Networked sociability online, off-line 231Kraut, Robert, Patterson, Michael, Lundmark, Vicki, Kiesler, Sara, Mukhopadhyay,Tridas, and Scherlis, William (1998) “Internet Paradox: A Social Technology thatReduces Social Involvement and Psychological Well-being?,” AmericanPsychologist 53 (9): 1017–31.——, Kiesler, Sara, Boneva, Bonka, Cummings, Jonathon, Helgeson, Vicki, andCrawford, Anne (2002) “Internet Paradox Revisited,” Journal of Social Issues 58(1): 49–74.KRC Research (2003) “Email Use Survey: Survey of ‘Professional Email Users’ in theUK, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Denmark, Sweden, the United States andCanada,” report to Oracle, July. London: Weber Shandwick.Kretzmann, J. P. and McKnight, J. L. (1993) Building Communities from the InsideOut: A Path Toward Finding and Mobilizing a Community’s Assets. Chicago, IL:ACTA.Kuo, Frances, Sullivan, William, Coley, Rebekah, and Brunson, Liesette (1998)“Fertile Ground for Community: Inner-city Neighborhood Common Spaces,”American Journal of Community Psychology 26 (6): 823–51.Lactis, Eric (1999) “Shock Absorption: In the Info Age, We’ve Become Blasé,” TheSeattle Times, February 7, L2.McPherson, Miller, Smith-Lovin, Lynn and Cook, James (2001) “Birds of a Feather:Homophily in Social Networks,” Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415–44.Matei, Sorin and Ball-Rokeach, Sandra (2001) “Real and Virtual Social Ties:Connections in the Everyday Lives of Seven Ethnic Neighborhoods,” AmericanBehavioral Scientist 45 (3): 550–63.—— and —— (2002) “Belonging in Geographic, Ethnic, and Internet Spaces,” inBarry Wellman and Caroline Haythornthwaite (eds), The Internet in Everyday Life,pp. 404–30. Oxford: Blackwell.Milgram, Stanley (1970) “The Experience of Living in Cities,” Science 167: 1461–8.Mitchell, William (1995) City of Bits: Space, Place and the Infobahn. Cambridge, CA:MIT Press.Nie, Norman, and Erbring, Lutz (2000) “Internet and Society: A Preliminary Report,”Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society, Stanford University,retrieved May 24, 2001 (http://www.stanford.edu/group/siqss/Press_Release/Preliminary_Report-4-21.pdf).——, Killygus, D. Sunshine, and Erbring, Lutz (2002) “Internet Use, InterpersonalRelations, and Sociability,” in Barry Wellman and Caroline Haythornthwaite (eds),The Internet in Everyday Life, pp. 215–43. Oxford: Blackwell.Oldenburg, Ray (1989/1999) The Great Good Place: Cafés, Coffee Shops, CommunityCenters, Beauty Parlors, General Stores, Bars, Hangout, and How They Get YouThrough the Day. New York: Paragon House.O’Toole, Kathleen (2000) “Study Offers Early Look at How Internet is Changing DailyLife,” February 16. News Release, Stanford, CA: Stanford Institute for theQuantitative Study of Society, retrieved May 24, 2001 (http://www.stanford.edu/group/siqss/Press_Release/press_release.html).Putnam, Robert (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of AmericanCommunity. NewYork: Simon and Schuster.Resnick, Paul and Shah, Vishant (2002) “Photo Directories: A Tool for OrganizingSociability in Neighborhoods and Organizations,” Working paper, retrieved July 4,2003 (http://www.si.umich.edu/~presnick/papers/whothat/WhoThat021303.pdf).Scheer, Robert (2000) “Stanford Internet Study Paints the Wrong Picture,” OnlineJournalism Review. Annenberg School for Communication at the University of