10.07.2015 Views

Proceedings of the Workshop - United Nations Office for Outer ...

Proceedings of the Workshop - United Nations Office for Outer ...

Proceedings of the Workshop - United Nations Office for Outer ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

102 EXPANDING GLOBAL REMOTE SENSING SERVICESnorms.37 They also represent an intentional affirmation<strong>of</strong>, and return to, international agreement by consensus<strong>for</strong> space technology after a previous departure fromthat process regarding direct broadcasting satellites. Assuch, <strong>the</strong> Principles represent an intention tocompromise ra<strong>the</strong>r than an intention to disagree. Thatcompromise was intended by <strong>the</strong> drafters <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Principles to serve as a first step in <strong>the</strong> law makingprocess which would eventually conclude in a <strong>for</strong>maltreaty.38On <strong>the</strong> domestic plane, <strong>the</strong> legislation <strong>of</strong> majorremote sensing nations has authority <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>development <strong>of</strong> international remote sensing law similarto <strong>the</strong> way that practices <strong>of</strong> strong maritime nationsinfluenced <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> international maritimelaw.39 Specific standards contained in <strong>the</strong> Principleswere incorporated by <strong>the</strong> <strong>United</strong> States in its domesticlegislation twice.40 This was done to maintain <strong>the</strong> publicgood aspects <strong>of</strong> remote sensing, promote <strong>the</strong> broadestpossible data use, and to place <strong>the</strong> <strong>United</strong> States in afavorable position in relation to nations that arguedprior consent was necessary <strong>for</strong> remote sensing.41 Thislast point is particularly meaningful in <strong>the</strong> development<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Principles as accepted law. The influence <strong>of</strong>U.N. declarations <strong>of</strong> principles is "strongparticularly...when <strong>the</strong> solutions included in suchprinciples end...controversies."42A member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Japanese delegation whichadopted <strong>the</strong> Principles explains that in Japan, "<strong>the</strong>re isno domestic law or regulation which directly regulatesremote sensing."43 There<strong>for</strong>e, <strong>the</strong> Principles are "treatedas a substantial source <strong>of</strong> law <strong>for</strong> remote sensing" and"NASDA's remote sensing activities are surely beingper<strong>for</strong>med pursuant to <strong>the</strong>se principles."44The Principles are also incorporated into <strong>the</strong>bilateral RADAR SAT agreement between <strong>the</strong> <strong>United</strong>States and ano<strong>the</strong>r leading remote sensing nation,Canada, and <strong>the</strong>y set <strong>the</strong> standard <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> parties'cooperation.45 The Principles are specifically referredto as guiding legal principles in <strong>the</strong> European SpaceAgency (ESA) document governing data <strong>for</strong>m <strong>the</strong> ERS-1 and ERS-2 satellites.46 The data policy <strong>for</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>rEuropean satellite, Envisat, was approved by <strong>the</strong> ESAProgramme Board <strong>for</strong> Earth Observations andspecifically contains a "Legal Framework" thatmandates "Envisat data shall be available in an openand non-discriminatory way, and distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>data shall be consistent with <strong>the</strong> <strong>United</strong> <strong>Nations</strong>37 Kopal, supra, note 31.38 Report, supra, note 30, at 48.39 DeSaussure, H., Remote Sensing Satellite Regulation byNational and International Law, 15 Rutgers Computer andTechnology Law Journal 352, at 375, (1989).40 Commercialization Act, 15 U.S.C. § 4201 (1984), Nowrepealed and replaced with Policy Act, 15 U.S.C. § 5621(1992).41 "Specifically, <strong>the</strong> Committee is reluctant to take any actionwhich: 1) could interfere with U.S. Treaty obligations; 2) mightrevive debate in <strong>the</strong> <strong>United</strong> <strong>Nations</strong> about <strong>the</strong> legitimacy <strong>of</strong>remote-sensing without prior consent by <strong>the</strong> sensed nation; and3) sets a precedent which might lead o<strong>the</strong>r nations to imposeincreased restrictions on access to <strong>the</strong>ir data from <strong>the</strong>irgovernment-operated remote-sensing systems." H.R. Rep. 102-539, 102d Cong., 2d Sess., at 53, (1992).42 Kopal, supra, note 31.43 Kawamoto, Chiyoshi, NASDA's Activities in <strong>the</strong> Field o fRemote Sensing, International Bar Association, 10th BiennialConference <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Section on Business Law, Hong Kong, at 5(1991).44 Id.45 "Data distribution shall be consistent with <strong>the</strong> <strong>United</strong><strong>Nations</strong> Resolution 41/65 <strong>of</strong> December 3, 1986 on <strong>the</strong>Principles Relating to Remote Sensing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Garth fromSpace." RADAR SAT Data Policy, Document Number RCA-PR0004, Sec. 10.1 b„ (Canadian Space Agency), July 13, 1994,at 11.46 Principles o f <strong>the</strong> Provision o f ERS Data to Users, ESA/PB-EO (90) 57, rev. 6, Paris, 9 May 1994, (European SpaceAgency, Earth Observation Programme Board), Sec. 2 GeneralPrinciples, 2.1 Legal Principles, para. 2, at 2.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!