10.07.2015 Views

Proceedings of the Workshop - United Nations Office for Outer ...

Proceedings of the Workshop - United Nations Office for Outer ...

Proceedings of the Workshop - United Nations Office for Outer ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

66 EXPANDING GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS SERVICESResolution 1962 <strong>of</strong> 1963, <strong>the</strong> 'Declaration <strong>of</strong> LegalPrinciples Governing <strong>the</strong> Activities <strong>of</strong> States in <strong>the</strong>Exploration and Use <strong>of</strong> <strong>Outer</strong> Space',6 and <strong>the</strong>manifestation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se Principles in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Outer</strong> SpaceTreaty <strong>of</strong> 1967.7 Of course, over <strong>the</strong> years <strong>the</strong> nonspace-activestates, and in particular <strong>the</strong> developingcountries, have expressed reservations about <strong>the</strong> extentto which actual benefit from space activities hasaccrued to <strong>the</strong>m, General Assembly Resolution 51/122<strong>of</strong> 19978 being <strong>the</strong> clearest outcome <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir concern, aswell as evidence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> willingness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> spacecompetentstates to consider <strong>the</strong> matter. But while onecan have sympathy with <strong>the</strong> point, telecommunicationscan certainly be cited as one area in which all countrieswilling and anxious to benefit from space have beenable to do so.It would be otiose to pretend that after Resolution1721 <strong>of</strong> 1961 matters were simple or easy. Thetechnicalities were to take time, and <strong>the</strong>re was muchdiscussion and compromise to come on <strong>the</strong> legalities.How best to set up a 'single global system' <strong>for</strong> spacetelecommunications was a question to which differentanswers were possible. Within a year <strong>the</strong> <strong>United</strong> Stateshad created <strong>the</strong> Communications Satellite Corporationwith some hope that it would build and run a servicewhich o<strong>the</strong>rs would use on a commercial basis.9 O<strong>the</strong>rswanted an arrangement under which <strong>the</strong> enterprise, itspr<strong>of</strong>its and losses and <strong>the</strong> technical expertise resultingfrom <strong>the</strong> endeavour, would be shared, and that is whattranspired. Interim Arrangements <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> InternationalSatellite Telecommunications Organisation(INTELSAT) were set up in <strong>the</strong> shadow, as it were, <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> ‘Principles’ Resolution <strong>of</strong> 1963.10 The InterimArrangements were innovative, having more <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>character <strong>of</strong> an arrangement among joint venturers thanhad hi<strong>the</strong>rto been normal in international organisations.After nine years, in 1973 <strong>the</strong>se interim arrangementswere replaced, INTELSAT as we have known it <strong>for</strong> aquarter <strong>of</strong> a century came into being,11and it must beacknowledged that it fulfilled, and continues to fulfil,many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> high expectations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1961 UNResolution. The concept <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> linkedintergovernmental agreement and <strong>the</strong> operatingagreement between telecommunications entities (takenover from <strong>the</strong> Interim Arrangements) was novel. Therelating <strong>of</strong> financial obligation and <strong>the</strong> sharing <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it,and fundamentally <strong>the</strong> weighting <strong>of</strong> representation in <strong>the</strong>Board <strong>of</strong> Governors, to usage, was a master-stroke. Itaf<strong>for</strong>ded, and af<strong>for</strong>ds a workable solution to <strong>the</strong>constant problem found in so many internationalorganisations (including <strong>the</strong> ITU) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> difficultiescaused when <strong>the</strong> dogma 'one state one vote' is notmatched by equality <strong>of</strong> financial commitment.For a variety <strong>of</strong> reasons a separate organisation,INMARSAT, was created to provide maritime mobileservices, through <strong>the</strong> agency <strong>of</strong> what was originallycalled <strong>the</strong> International Maritime SatelliteOrganisation.12 For related reasons, including <strong>the</strong>6 The Declaration <strong>of</strong> Legal Principles Governing <strong>the</strong> Activities<strong>of</strong> States in <strong>the</strong> Exploration and Use <strong>of</strong> <strong>Outer</strong> Space, 13December 1963, G.A. Res., 1962 (XVIII).7Treaty on Principles Governing <strong>the</strong> Activities <strong>of</strong> States in <strong>the</strong>Exploration and Use <strong>of</strong> <strong>Outer</strong> Space, including <strong>the</strong> Moon ando<strong>the</strong>r Celestial Bodies, 1967,610 UNTS 205; (1968) UKTS 10,Cmnd. 3519; 18 UST 2410, TIAS 6347; 6 ILM 386; 61 AJIL644.8 Declaration on International Cooperation in <strong>the</strong> Explorationand Use <strong>of</strong> <strong>Outer</strong> Space <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Benefit and in <strong>the</strong> Interest <strong>of</strong> AllStates, Taking into Particular Account <strong>the</strong> Needs <strong>of</strong> DevelopingCountries’ A/RES/51/122 4 February 1997.9 See <strong>the</strong> (US) Communications Satellite Act 1962, (Public Law87-624; 76 Stat. 419,47 USC 701-44), as subsequentlyamended. The Articles <strong>of</strong> Incorporation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Corporation areprinted (1963) 2 ILM 395.10 Agreement Establishing Interim Arrangements <strong>for</strong> a GlobalCommercial Communications Satellite System, and RelativeSpecial Agreement, (UK) 1964 Cmnd. 2436; (1964) 3 ILM80511 Agreement and Operating Agreement relating to <strong>the</strong>International Telecommunications Satellite Organisation(INTELSAT), Washington, 1971, (1973) UKTS No. 80, Cmnd.5461; 23 UST 3813 and 4091, TIAS 7532; (1971) 10 ILM1909.12 Convention and Operating Agreement on <strong>the</strong> InternationalMaritime Satellite Organisation (INMARSAT) with OperatingAgreement, London 1976; 1143 UNTS 105 and 213; (1976)UKTS No. 94, Cmnd. 7722; 31 UST 1 and 135, HAS 9605;(1976) 15 ILM 1051-75. Although it retains <strong>the</strong> acronym <strong>of</strong> itsolder incarnation, INMARSAT is now <strong>for</strong>mally titled <strong>the</strong>International Mobile Satellite Organisation, as <strong>the</strong> businesstransacted has expanded into o<strong>the</strong>r fields <strong>of</strong> mobilecommunications.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!