11.07.2015 Views

Systems Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Cotton Varieties in ...

Systems Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Cotton Varieties in ...

Systems Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Cotton Varieties in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>and</strong>omized complete block design was used at all three locations. Weed <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>sect controlmeasures, if needed, <strong>and</strong> harvest aid applications were performed commercially or bycooperat<strong>in</strong>g producers. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the grow<strong>in</strong>g season, it was determ<strong>in</strong>ed that the plots at Farwellwere subjected to light chemical damage (tank contam<strong>in</strong>ation or drift) from a sorghum herbicide.However, none <strong>of</strong> the varieties were significantly affected <strong>and</strong> harvest was performed. Plotswere harvested with commercial harvesters by producers with assistance provided by programpersonnel at all locations. Individual location <strong>in</strong>formation was as follows:Location 1: Farwell, TX – Parmer CountyAt the Farwell location, twelve varieties were planted to 30” straight rows on the flat <strong>in</strong> aterm<strong>in</strong>ated rye cover-crop on 18-May with a seed<strong>in</strong>g rate <strong>of</strong> approximately 60,000 seed peracre. This location was under a Low Elevation Spray Application (LESA) center pivot irrigationsystem. Plot size was 8 rows by variable length due to center pivot. Plots were harvested on 7-November <strong>and</strong> grab samples were taken by plot <strong>and</strong> g<strong>in</strong>ned at the Texas A&M AgriLifeResearch <strong>and</strong> Extension Center at Lubbock. Result<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>t samples were submitted to the TexasTech University – Fiber <strong>and</strong> Biopolymer Research Institute for HVI fiber analysis <strong>and</strong> CCC loanvalues were calculated.<strong>Varieties</strong> planted at Farwell (LESA irrigation system):1. All-Tex Epic RF2. Americot 1551RF3. FiberMax 2011GT4. FiberMax 9250GL5. All-Tex Edge B2RF6. NexGen 2051B2RF7. FiberMax 1944GLB28. Croplan Genetics 3156B2RF9. Deltap<strong>in</strong>e 1212B2RF10. PhytoGen 367WRF11. Deltap<strong>in</strong>e 1219B2RF12. PhytoGen 499WRFLocation 2: Pla<strong>in</strong>s, TX – Yoakum CountyTwenty commercially available varieties were <strong>in</strong>cluded at the Pla<strong>in</strong>s location. Most varietiesplanted on 23-May conta<strong>in</strong>ed Roundup Ready Flex technology stacked with Bollgard II orWidestrike <strong>in</strong>sect technologies. Plots were variable length due to LESA center pivot irrigation<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>cluded 12 – 40” rows. The seed<strong>in</strong>g rate at Pla<strong>in</strong>s was approximately 49,000 seeds/acre.Harvest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> plots was performed on 30 <strong>and</strong> 31-October us<strong>in</strong>g producer provided equipment.Plot weights were taken us<strong>in</strong>g weigh trailers with <strong>in</strong>tegral digital scale systems. Dur<strong>in</strong>g harvest,grab samples were taken by plot for g<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g at the Texas A&M AgriLife Research <strong>and</strong> ExtensionCenter near Lubbock. L<strong>in</strong>t samples were collected dur<strong>in</strong>g g<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> submitted to the TexasTech University – Fiber <strong>and</strong> Biopolymer Research Institue for HVI fiber analysis. After l<strong>in</strong>tquality determ<strong>in</strong>ation, CCC loan values were calculated for each plot.3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!