Systems Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Cotton Varieties in ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Systems Agronomic and EconomicEvaluation of Cotton Varietiesin the Texas High Plains2012 Final ReportSubmitted toPlains Cotton GrowersPlains Cotton Improvement ProgramDr. Mark KelleyExtension Agronomist-CottonMr. Chris AshbrookExtension AssistantTexas A&M AgriLife Extension ServiceTexas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension CenterLubbock, TXFebruary, 2013Trade names of commercial products used in this report are included only for better understanding and clarity.Reference to commercial products or trade names is made with the understanding that no discrimination isintended and no endorsement by the Texas A&M System is implied. Readers should realize that results fromone experiment do not represent conclusive evidence that the same response would occur where conditionsvary. Extension programs serve all people regardless of socioeconomic level, race, color, sex, religion,disability, or national origin. The Texas A&M System, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the CountyCommissioners Courts of Texas Cooperating.i
ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThe authors thank the following for their support of this project:Plains Cotton Growers - Plains Cotton Improvement Programand Cotton Incorporated - Texas State Support for fundingSystems Variety Test Producer-Cooperators:Mark and David Appling - BlancoRickey Bearden - PlainsMark and Ryan Williams- FarwellUSDA-ARS Researcher:Dr. John Wanjura - USDA-ARS, LubbockCompanies:All-Tex, Americot/NexGen,Bayer CropScience (FiberMax and Stoneville),Delta and Pine Land/Monsanto, Dyna-Gro,PhytoGen, Croplan Genetics, Syngenta,Chemtura, NuFarm Americas Inc.Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service Specialists and Assistants:Dr. Jason Woodward - Extension PathologistMr. Colton Smith - Extension AssistantTexas A&M AgriLife Extension Service Agents:Curtis Preston, CEA-AG/NR, Bailey CountyMonti Vandiver, EA-IPM, Bailey/Parmer CountiesKerry Siders, EA-IPM, Cochran/Hockley CountiesCaitlin Jackson, CEA-AG/NR, Crosby CountyDustin Patman, EA-IPM, Crosby/Floyd CountiesGary Roschetzky, CEA-AG/NR, Dawson CountyTommy Doederlein, EA-IPM, Dawson/Lynn CountiesEthan Fortenberry, CEA-AG/NR, Floyd CountyGary Cross, EA-AG/NR, Hale CountyMark Brown, CEA-AG/NR, Lubbock CountyBryan Reynolds, CEA-AG/NR, Lynn CountyBenji Henderson, CEA-AG/NR, Parmer CountyDavid Graf, EA-AG/NR, Swisher CountyChris Bishop, CEA-AG/NR, Terry Countyii
Page 4 and 5: Scott Russell, EA-IPM, Terry/Yoakum
Page 6 and 7: Replicated No-Till LESA Irrigated R
Page 8 and 9: Agronomic and Economic Evaluation o
Page 10: andomized complete block design was
Page 14 and 15: not significant at this location. H
Page 16 and 17: Table 1. Inseason plant measurement
Page 18 and 19: Table 3. HVI fiber property results
Page 20 and 21: Entry Lint Seed Bur cotton Lint See
Page 22 and 23: Table 7. Inseason plant measurement
Page 24 and 25: Table 9. Final plant map results fr
Page 26 and 27: Table 11. HVI fiber property result
Page 28 and 29: Replicated LESA Irrigated RACE Vari
Page 30 and 31: Results and Discussion:Agronomic da
Page 34 and 35: Replicated Sub-Surface Drip Irrigat
Page 40 and 41: Replicated LEPA Irrigated RACE Vari
Page 44 and 45: Table 2. Final plant map results fr
Page 48 and 49: Replicated LESA Irrigated RACE Vari
Page 52 and 53:
Table 2. Final plant map results fr
Page 54 and 55:
Entry Lint Seed Bur cotton Lint See
Page 56 and 57:
Replicated Sub-Surface Drip Irrigat
Page 58 and 59:
Results and Discussion:Agronomic da
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Replicated Sub-Surface Drip Irrigat
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Replicated LESA Irrigated RACE Vari
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Replicated No-Till LESA Irrigated R
Page 82 and 83:
Results and Discussion:Acknowledgme
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Replicated LESA Irrigated RACE Vari
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Replicated LEPA Supplemental (Limit
Page 98 and 99:
lb/acre for FiberMax 2989GLB2. Lint
Page 100 and 101:
Table 2. HVI fiber property results
Page 102 and 103:
Texas Panhandle Cotton Variety Tria
Page 104 and 105:
Biopolymer Research Institue for HV
Page 106 and 107:
Location 2 - DumasAt the Dumas loca
Page 108 and 109:
cotton yields to determine lint and
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Replicated Dryland LargePlot Demons
Page 120 and 121:
Insecticides:Fertilizer management:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Replicated Dryland Cotton Variety T
Page 128 and 129:
Results and Discussion:Significant
Page 130 and 131:
Table 2. HVI fiber property results
Page 132 and 133:
125Plains Dryland Systems Variety T
Page 134 and 135:
127Blanco Dryland Systems Variety T
Page 136 and 137:
129Dawson County Dryland RACE Demon
Page 138 and 139:
131Lynn County Irrigated RACE Demon
Page 140 and 141:
Subsurface Drip Irrigation Pre-plan
Page 142 and 143:
Effects of Variable In-Season Irrig
Page 144 and 145:
Table 1. Response of commercially a
Page 146 and 147:
Table 1. cont. †BrandVarietyVerti
Page 148 and 149:
There were six locations planted in
Page 150 and 151:
Table 2. HVI ratings for varieties
Page 152 and 153:
Table 4. HVI ratings for varieties
Page 154 and 155:
Table 6. Effect of variety on HVI r
Page 156 and 157:
Table 7. cont.Variety bRel.ValueRan
Page 158 and 159:
High Plains (TASS 1N and 1S)Planted
Page 160 and 161:
Lubbock Air TemperaturesMay, 2012Te
Page 162 and 163:
Lubbock Air TemperaturesSeptember,
Page 164 and 165:
Precipitation (inches)4.0LTA20123.0
Page 166 and 167:
Are side-by-side plots more valuabl
Page 168:
Is a one-year test valid, or are se
show all

Systems Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Cotton Varieties in ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?