Systems Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Cotton Varieties in ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

129Dawson County Dryland RACE Demonstration - 2012 Variety Rep 1 Rep 2 Rep 3Tower Track8 Row Border1 AT Edge B2RF1 AT Edge B2RF 2 AM 1511 B2RF2 AM 1511 B2RF 3 NG 4012 B2RF3 NG 4012 B2RF 4 DP 1044B2RF4 DP 1044B2RF 5 DG 2570B2RF5 DG 2570B2RF 6 FM 2989GLB26 FM 2989GLB2 7 ST 5458B2RF7 ST 5458B2RF 8 PHY 499 WRF8 PHY 499 WRFTower Track (16 rows Bulk)4 DP 1044B2RFPlanting date 5/22/20123 NG 4012 B2RFSeeding rate 52.7 K/A8 PHY 499 WRF7 ST 5458B2RFInsecticide2 AM 1511 B2RFHerbicide1 AT Edge B2RFFertilizer6 FM 2989GLB25 DG 2570B2RFTemp @ plantingTower Track (16 rows Bulk)5 DG 2570B2RFMoisture @ planting6 FM 2989GLB27 ST 5458B2RFCOMMENTS: 4 row plots (8 row planter)8 PHY 499 WRF3 NG 4012 B2RF4 DP 1044B2RF1 AT Edge B2RF2 AM 1511 B2RFRep IIIRep IIRep IGoogle Maps
130Castro County Irrigated RACE Demonstration - 2012 Variety Rep 1 Rep 2 Rep 38 rows border FM 9250GL1 AT Nitro-44 B2RF1 AT Nitro-44 B2RF 2 NG 3348 B2RF2 NG 3348 B2RF 3 DP 0912B2RF3 DP 0912B2RF 4 DG 2595B2RF4 DG 2595B2RF 5 FM 2011GT5 FM 2011GT 6 ST 4288B2F6 ST 4288B2F 7 PHY 367 WRF7 PHY 367 WRF3 DP 0912B2RF6 ST 4288B2F1 AT Nitro-44 B2RF7 PHY 367 WRFRep IIRep I4 DG 2595B2RF2 NG 3348 B2RF5 FM 2011GT5 FM 2011GT7 PHY 367 WRF2 NG 3348 B2RF4 DG 2595B2RFRep III6 ST 4288B2F1 AT Nitro-44 B2RF3 DP 0912B2RFPlanting date 5/2/2012Seeding rate ~63K seed/acreInsecticide NoneHerbicide NoneFertilizer NoneTemp @ planting 97Moisture @ planting some moisture will water upCOMMENTS:30" row spacing8 rows buffer on north endfurrow irrigatedRemainder of field FM 9250GL and mixed
Page 2 and 3:
Systems Agronomic and EconomicEvalu
Page 4 and 5:
Scott Russell, EA-IPM, Terry/Yoakum
Page 6 and 7:
Replicated No-Till LESA Irrigated R
Page 8 and 9:
Agronomic and Economic Evaluation o
Page 10:
andomized complete block design was
Page 14 and 15:
not significant at this location. H
Page 16 and 17:
Table 1. Inseason plant measurement
Page 18 and 19:
Table 3. HVI fiber property results
Page 20 and 21:
Entry Lint Seed Bur cotton Lint See
Page 22 and 23:
Table 7. Inseason plant measurement
Page 24 and 25:
Table 9. Final plant map results fr
Page 26 and 27:
Table 11. HVI fiber property result
Page 28 and 29:
Replicated LESA Irrigated RACE Vari
Page 30 and 31:
Results and Discussion:Agronomic da
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Replicated Sub-Surface Drip Irrigat
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Replicated LEPA Irrigated RACE Vari
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Replicated No-Till LESA Irrigated R
Page 82 and 83:
Results and Discussion:Acknowledgme
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87: Entry Lint Seed Bur cotton Lint See
Page 88 and 89: Replicated LESA Irrigated RACE Vari
Page 90 and 91: Results and Discussion:Agronomic da
Page 92 and 93: Table 2. Final plant map results fr
Page 96 and 97: Replicated LEPA Supplemental (Limit
Page 98 and 99: lb/acre for FiberMax 2989GLB2. Lint
Page 100 and 101: Table 2. HVI fiber property results
Page 102 and 103: Texas Panhandle Cotton Variety Tria
Page 104 and 105: Biopolymer Research Institue for HV
Page 106 and 107: Location 2 - DumasAt the Dumas loca
Page 108 and 109: cotton yields to determine lint and
Page 118 and 119: Replicated Dryland LargePlot Demons
Page 120 and 121: Insecticides:Fertilizer management:
Page 122 and 123: Table 1. Final plant map results fr
Page 126 and 127: Replicated Dryland Cotton Variety T
Page 128 and 129: Results and Discussion:Significant
Page 130 and 131: Table 2. HVI fiber property results
Page 132 and 133: 125Plains Dryland Systems Variety T
Page 134 and 135: 127Blanco Dryland Systems Variety T
Page 138 and 139: 131Lynn County Irrigated RACE Demon
Page 140 and 141: Subsurface Drip Irrigation Pre-plan
Page 142 and 143: Effects of Variable In-Season Irrig
Page 144 and 145: Table 1. Response of commercially a
Page 146 and 147: Table 1. cont. †BrandVarietyVerti
Page 148 and 149: There were six locations planted in
Page 150 and 151: Table 2. HVI ratings for varieties
Page 152 and 153: Table 4. HVI ratings for varieties
Page 154 and 155: Table 6. Effect of variety on HVI r
Page 156 and 157: Table 7. cont.Variety bRel.ValueRan
Page 158 and 159: High Plains (TASS 1N and 1S)Planted
Page 160 and 161: Lubbock Air TemperaturesMay, 2012Te
Page 162 and 163: Lubbock Air TemperaturesSeptember,
Page 164 and 165: Precipitation (inches)4.0LTA20123.0
Page 166 and 167: Are side-by-side plots more valuabl
Page 168: Is a one-year test valid, or are se
show all

Systems Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Cotton Varieties in ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?