11.07.2015 Views

Systems Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Cotton Varieties in ...

Systems Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Cotton Varieties in ...

Systems Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Cotton Varieties in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Results <strong>and</strong> Discussion:<strong>Agronomic</strong> data <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g plant population, boll storm resistance <strong>and</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al plantmap data are <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> Tables 1-3.Significant differences were noted for most yield <strong>and</strong> economic parameters (Table4). L<strong>in</strong>t turnout averaged 35.1% with a high <strong>of</strong> 37.6% for NexGen 1511B2RF <strong>and</strong>Croplan Genetics 3787B2RF with a low <strong>of</strong> 33.1% for NexGen 4010B2RF. Burcotton yield averaged 3222 lb/acre <strong>and</strong> ranged from a high <strong>of</strong> 3390 lb/acre forFiberMax 2484B2F to a low <strong>of</strong> 2952 lb/acre for Croplan 3787B2RF. L<strong>in</strong>t yieldsvaried from a low <strong>of</strong> 1040 lb/acre (NexGen 4010B2RF) to a high <strong>of</strong> 1221 lb/acre(Dyna-Gro 2570B2RF). L<strong>in</strong>t loan values averaged $0.5305/lb across varieties,but differences were not significant. When add<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>t <strong>and</strong> seed value, totalvalues ranged from a high <strong>of</strong> $904.01/acre for Dyna-Gro 2570B2RF to a low <strong>of</strong>$803.65/acre for Deltap<strong>in</strong>e 0912B2RF. After subtract<strong>in</strong>g g<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g, seed costs <strong>and</strong>technology fees, the net value/acre among varieties ranged from a high <strong>of</strong>$727.72/acre (Dyna-Gro 2570B2RF) to a low <strong>of</strong> $631.34/acre (Deltap<strong>in</strong>e0912B2RF), a difference <strong>of</strong> $96.38.Significant differences were observed among varieties for most fiber qualityparameters measured at this location (Table 5). Micronaire values ranged from alow <strong>of</strong> 3.4 for FiberMax 2484B2F to a high <strong>of</strong> 4.4 for NexGen 1511B2RF. Stapleaveraged 34.4 across all varieties with a high <strong>of</strong> 36.9 for FiberMax 2484B2F <strong>and</strong> alow <strong>of</strong> 33.5 for NexGen 1511B2RF. Uniformity differences were not significant<strong>and</strong> a test average <strong>of</strong> 81.2% was observed. Strength ranged from a low <strong>of</strong> 27.4g/tex for Croplan Genetics 3787B2RF to a high <strong>of</strong> 31.2 g/tex for All-Tex Nitro-44B2RF. Elongation averaged 10.8% across varieties <strong>and</strong> leaf grades averaged2.7 with a high <strong>of</strong> 4.0 for All-Tex Nitro-44 B2RF <strong>and</strong> a low <strong>of</strong> 1.0 for CroplanGenetics 3787B2RF. Color grade components <strong>of</strong> Rd (reflectance) <strong>and</strong> +b(yellowness) averaged 76.6 <strong>and</strong> 9.3, respectively <strong>and</strong> resulted <strong>in</strong> color grades <strong>of</strong>mostly 21 <strong>and</strong> 31.These data <strong>in</strong>dicate that substantial differences can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> netvalue/acre due to variety selection. Additional multi-site <strong>and</strong> multi-year appliedresearch is needed to evaluate varieties across a series <strong>of</strong> environments.Acknowledgments:Disclaimer Clause:Appreciation is expressed to Rhett Mimms for the use <strong>of</strong> his l<strong>and</strong>, equipment <strong>and</strong>labor for this demonstration. Further assistance with this project was provided byDr. Jane Dever - Texas A&M AgriLife Research <strong>and</strong> Extension Center, Lubbock,<strong>and</strong> Dr. Eric Hequet - Associate Director, Fiber <strong>and</strong> Biopolymer Research Institute,Texas Tech University. Furthermore, we greatly appreciate the TexasDepartment <strong>of</strong> Agriculture - Food <strong>and</strong> Fiber Research for fund<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> HVI test<strong>in</strong>g.Trade names <strong>of</strong> commercial products used <strong>in</strong> this report are <strong>in</strong>cluded only forbetter underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> clarity. Reference to commercial products or tradenames is made with the underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g that no discrim<strong>in</strong>ation is <strong>in</strong>tended <strong>and</strong> noendorsement by the Texas A&M System is implied. Readers should realize thatresults from one experiment do not represent conclusive evidence that the sameresponse would occur where conditions vary.59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!