11.07.2015 Views

Systems Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Cotton Varieties in ...

Systems Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Cotton Varieties in ...

Systems Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Cotton Varieties in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Results <strong>and</strong> Discussion:<strong>Agronomic</strong> data <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g plant population, nodes above white flower (NAWF), bollstorm resistance, <strong>and</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al plant map data are <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> Tables 1-3.Significant differences were noted for all yield <strong>and</strong> economic parameters (Table 4).L<strong>in</strong>t turnout averaged 35.4% with a high <strong>of</strong> 37.7% <strong>and</strong> low <strong>of</strong> 32.9% for NexGen1511B2RF <strong>and</strong> All-Tex Nitro-44 B2RF, respectively. Bur cotton yields averaged3709 lb/acre across varieties <strong>and</strong> differences were significant at the 0.10 level. L<strong>in</strong>tyields varied from a low <strong>of</strong> 1167 lb/acre (All-Tex Nitro-44 B2RF) to a high <strong>of</strong> 1456lb/acre (Dyna-Gro 2595B2RF). L<strong>in</strong>t loan values ranged from a low <strong>of</strong> $0.5223/lb toa high <strong>of</strong> $0.5715/lb for Stoneville 5458B2RF <strong>and</strong> FiberMax 2484 B2F,respectively. When add<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>t <strong>and</strong> seed value, total value ranged from a high <strong>of</strong>$1102.72/acre for Dyna-Gro 2595B2RF to a low <strong>of</strong> $915.53 /acre for All-TexNitro-44 B2RF. After subtract<strong>in</strong>g g<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g, seed costs <strong>and</strong> technology fees, the netvalue/acre among varieties ranged from a high <strong>of</strong> $921.49/acre (Dyna-Gro2595B2RF) to a low <strong>of</strong> $748.42/acre (All-Tex Nitro-44 B2RF), a difference <strong>of</strong>$173.07.Significant differences were observed among varieties for all fiber qualityparameters at this location (Table 5). Micronaire values ranged from a low <strong>of</strong> 4.3for All-Tex Nitro-44 B2RF <strong>and</strong> Croplan Genetics 3787B2RF to a high <strong>of</strong> 4.9 forDeltap<strong>in</strong>e 0912B2RF. Staple averaged 34.7 across all varieties with a high <strong>of</strong> 36.5for All-Tex Nitro-44 B2RF <strong>and</strong> a low <strong>of</strong> 33.5 for NexGen 1511B2RF. Differences<strong>in</strong> uniformity were highly significant <strong>and</strong> values ranged from a high <strong>of</strong> 83.0% forAll-Tex Nitro-44 B2RF to a low <strong>of</strong> 80.3% for Stoneville 5484B2RF with a testaverage <strong>of</strong> 81.8%. Strength ranged from a low <strong>of</strong> 29.0 g/tex for Stoneville5484B2RF to a high <strong>of</strong> 32.9 g/tex for All-Tex Nitro-44 B2RF. Elongation averaged10.5% across <strong>and</strong> leaf grades were mostly 1 <strong>and</strong> 2. Color grade components <strong>of</strong> Rd(reflectance) <strong>and</strong> +b (yellowness) averaged 77.0 <strong>and</strong> 9.2, respectively <strong>and</strong>resulted <strong>in</strong> color grades <strong>of</strong> mostly 21 <strong>and</strong> 31.These data <strong>in</strong>dicate that substantial differences can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> netvalue/acre due to variety selection. Additional multi-site <strong>and</strong> multi-year appliedresearch is needed to evaluate varieties across a series <strong>of</strong> environments.Acknowledgments:Disclaimer Clause:Appreciation is expressed to Mike <strong>and</strong> Jacob Henson for the use <strong>of</strong> their l<strong>and</strong>,equipment <strong>and</strong> labor for this demonstration. Further assistance with this projectwas provided by Dr. Jane Dever - Texas A&M AgriLife Research <strong>and</strong> ExtensionCenter, Lubbock, <strong>and</strong> Dr. Eric Hequet - Associate Director, Fiber <strong>and</strong> BiopolymerResearch Institute, Texas Tech University. Furthermore, we greatly appreciatethe Texas Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture - Food <strong>and</strong> Fiber Research for fund<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> HVItest<strong>in</strong>g.Trade names <strong>of</strong> commercial products used <strong>in</strong> this report are <strong>in</strong>cluded only forbetter underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> clarity. Reference to commercial products or tradenames is made with the underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g that no discrim<strong>in</strong>ation is <strong>in</strong>tended <strong>and</strong> noendorsement by the Texas A&M System is implied. Readers should realize thatresults from one experiment do not represent conclusive evidence that the sameresponse would occur where conditions vary.51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!