11.07.2015 Views

Systems Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Cotton Varieties in ...

Systems Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Cotton Varieties in ...

Systems Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Cotton Varieties in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 3. F<strong>in</strong>al plant map results from the Lubbock County irrigated RACE variety demonstration, Rhett Mimms Farm, Acuff, TX, 2012.total retention(%)Test average 71.5 28.5 10.7 65.8 39.9 55.39CV, % 7.5 19.0 10.5 5.1 18.7 6.4OSL 0.4952 0.4952 0.0636 † 0.0113 0.1382 0.0108LSD NS NS 1.6 5.8 NS 6.2For F<strong>in</strong>al plant map, numbers represent <strong>and</strong> average <strong>of</strong> 6 plants per variety per rep (18 plants per variety)CV - coefficient <strong>of</strong> variation.OSL - observed significance level, or probability <strong>of</strong> a greater F value.LSD - least significant difference at the 0.05 level, † <strong>in</strong>dicates significance at the 0.10 level, NS - not significantEntryFruit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> Retention 17-Sept% <strong>of</strong> fruit from1st position% <strong>of</strong> fruit from2nd position total fruit1st positionretention (%)2nd positionretention (%)62All-Tex Nitro-44 B2RF 72.4 27.6 10.6 64.7 38.9 53.97Croplan Genetics 3787B2RF 67.9 32.1 11.0 66.0 46.2 57.90Dyna-Gro 2570B2RF 71.4 28.6 9.3 61.9 38.4 52.40Deltap<strong>in</strong>e 0912B2RF 69.9 30.1 11.2 66.0 42.1 55.97FiberMax 2484B2F 72.2 27.8 9.8 63.8 35.1 51.73NexGen 1511B2RF 71.2 28.8 12.4 67.7 40.4 56.50NexGen 4010B2RF 76.0 24.0 10.0 60.6 32.6 50.43PhytoGen 499WRF 67.0 33.0 11.9 73.0 50.9 63.87Stoneville 5458B2RF 75.8 24.2 10.3 68.9 34.3 55.70

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!