Systems Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Cotton Varieties in ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

There were six locations planted in 2012, all with a history of Verticillium wilt. Each site wasplanted with 32 entries, in plots that were 36 ft. long and 2 rows wide, with four replications pervariety, arranged in a randomized complete design. The hot weather in 2012 resulted in little tono wilt at three of the six sites, so the three sites that had sufficient wilt to impact yield will bepresented. These sites are Floydada, Plainview, and Garden City. The results were remarkablysimilar in terms of the top yielding varieties at each site. The following varieties yielded in thetop five at each of the Verticillium wilt sites that they were planted: Fibermax (FM) 2484B2F,FM 2011GT, FM 9170B2F, BX 1347GLB2, and NexGen 4111RF.141
Table 1: Effect of variety in a Verticillium wilt trial in Floydada on yield and wilt.Variety aYieldxloanLbs ofLint/AcrePlants/Ft. ofrow%WiltOn28 Aug.Defolationon7 Sept. b TurnoutLoan($/lb)FM 2484B2F 801 1711 3.58 27.6 0.95 0.2875 0.46800FM 9170B2F 795 1665 3.55 40.2 0.99 0.2875 0.47750BX 1347GLB2 763 1613 3.84 20.1 1.16 0.2727 0.47325FM 2011GT 732 1551 3.47 32.7 1.82 0.2868 0.47175FM 9160B2F 706 1455 3.20 39.7 1.09 0.2803 0.48500DG 4 698 1535 3.54 46.0 1.46 0.2645 0.45475FM 1740B2F 693 1472 3.34 39.2 1.65 0.2956 0.47075NG 4111RF 692 1475 3.24 45.2 1.20 0.2693 0.46900DP 1219B2RF 661 1414 3.40 40.7 1.61 0.2705 0.46725FM 9250GL 658 1451 3.41 37.5 1.73 0.2680 0.45325NG 3348B2RF 654 1464 3.06 36.4 1.33 0.2736 0.44700DG 3 650 1295 3.28 37.8 1.92 0.2707 0.50225NG X00012 633 1232 3.07 55.6 1.80 0.2689 0.51350AT C253B2RF 620 1392 3.64 53.5 2.20 0.2798 0.44575FM 9180B2F 614 1325 3.17 45.7 1.28 0.2584 0.46300DP 0912B2RF 595 1304 3.30 45.0 1.77 0.2764 0.45625ST 4288B2F 595 1268 3.54 34.6 1.53 0.2391 0.46925DP 104B2RF 584 1305 3.36 45.2 1.52 0.2503 0.44725DP 1212B2RF 582 1226 3.38 46.4 2.55 0.2571 0.47450NG 1511B2RF 573 1249 3.34 50.6 1.86 0.2740 0.45825PG 367WRF 567 1302 3.56 38.6 1.60 0.2555 0.43450FM 9103GT 559 1262 3.33 49.5 1.88 0.2431 0.44325DP 0949B2RF 553 1219 3.47 37.6 1.97 0.2713 0.45350AM1550B2RF 542 1266 3.39 41.1 2.12 0.2513 0.42850AT RapidB2RF 537 1245 3.55 38.8 2.05 0.2565 0.43100NG 2051B2RF 533 1217 3.20 51.4 1.34 0.2268 0.43850DG 10 517 1203 3.60 50.2 2.20 0.2593 0.43000AT 789381RF 514 1152 3.05 60.3 1.78 0.2582 0.44675DG 2 511 1124 2.71 50.8 1.90 0.2520 0.45450AT C106466B2RF 505 1176 3.63 56.5 1.97 0.2418 0.42975DG 8 501 1123 3.51 48.0 2.39 0.2531 0.44575DG 7 491 1107 3.57 41.9 2.13 0.2588 0.44300MinimumSignificantDifference (0.05)48 105 0.20 12.5 0.55 0.019 0.049a AM=Americot, AT = All Tex, BX = Experimental for Bayer CropScience,DP=Deltapine, DG = DynaGro, FM = Fibermax, NG = NexGen, PG=Phytogen, ST =Stoneville.b The defoliation goes from 0 (no defoliation), 1 = 1/3 or less of plant is defoliated, 2 =1/3 – 2/3 of plant is defoliated, and 3 = > 2/3 of plant is defoliated.142
Page 2 and 3:
Systems Agronomic and EconomicEvalu
Page 4 and 5:
Scott Russell, EA-IPM, Terry/Yoakum
Page 6 and 7:
Replicated No-Till LESA Irrigated R
Page 8 and 9:
Agronomic and Economic Evaluation o
Page 10:
andomized complete block design was
Page 14 and 15:
not significant at this location. H
Page 16 and 17:
Table 1. Inseason plant measurement
Page 18 and 19:
Table 3. HVI fiber property results
Page 20 and 21:
Entry Lint Seed Bur cotton Lint See
Page 22 and 23:
Table 7. Inseason plant measurement
Page 24 and 25:
Table 9. Final plant map results fr
Page 26 and 27:
Table 11. HVI fiber property result
Page 28 and 29:
Replicated LESA Irrigated RACE Vari
Page 30 and 31:
Results and Discussion:Agronomic da
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Replicated Sub-Surface Drip Irrigat
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Replicated LEPA Irrigated RACE Vari
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Replicated No-Till LESA Irrigated R
Page 82 and 83:
Results and Discussion:Acknowledgme
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Replicated LEPA Supplemental (Limit
Page 98 and 99: lb/acre for FiberMax 2989GLB2. Lint
Page 100 and 101: Table 2. HVI fiber property results
Page 102 and 103: Texas Panhandle Cotton Variety Tria
Page 104 and 105: Biopolymer Research Institue for HV
Page 106 and 107: Location 2 - DumasAt the Dumas loca
Page 108 and 109: cotton yields to determine lint and
Page 110 and 111: Entry Lint Seed Bur cotton Lint See
Page 118 and 119: Replicated Dryland LargePlot Demons
Page 120 and 121: Insecticides:Fertilizer management:
Page 122 and 123: Table 1. Final plant map results fr
Page 126 and 127: Replicated Dryland Cotton Variety T
Page 128 and 129: Results and Discussion:Significant
Page 130 and 131: Table 2. HVI fiber property results
Page 132 and 133: 125Plains Dryland Systems Variety T
Page 134 and 135: 127Blanco Dryland Systems Variety T
Page 136 and 137: 129Dawson County Dryland RACE Demon
Page 138 and 139: 131Lynn County Irrigated RACE Demon
Page 140 and 141: Subsurface Drip Irrigation Pre-plan
Page 142 and 143: Effects of Variable In-Season Irrig
Page 144 and 145: Table 1. Response of commercially a
Page 146 and 147: Table 1. cont. †BrandVarietyVerti
Page 150 and 151: Table 2. HVI ratings for varieties
Page 152 and 153: Table 4. HVI ratings for varieties
Page 154 and 155: Table 6. Effect of variety on HVI r
Page 156 and 157: Table 7. cont.Variety bRel.ValueRan
Page 158 and 159: High Plains (TASS 1N and 1S)Planted
Page 160 and 161: Lubbock Air TemperaturesMay, 2012Te
Page 162 and 163: Lubbock Air TemperaturesSeptember,
Page 164 and 165: Precipitation (inches)4.0LTA20123.0
Page 166 and 167: Are side-by-side plots more valuabl
Page 168: Is a one-year test valid, or are se
show all

Systems Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Cotton Varieties in ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?