Systems Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Cotton Varieties in ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Entry Lint Seed Bur cotton Lint Seed Lint loan Lint Seed Total Ginning Seed/technologyturnout turnout yield yield yield value value value value cost costTest average 32.7 49.1 5269 1725 2586 0.5321 917.95 323.23 1241.18 158.08 95.45CV, % 4.9 5.0 7.3 7.4 7.4 4.7 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.3 --OSL 0.0005 0.3143 0.4786 0.0021 0.0875 † 0.0122 0.0006 0.0873 † 0.0034 0.4790 --LSD 2.7 NS NS 216 268 0.0421 115.36 33.55 155.85 NS --For net value/acre, means within a column with the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.05 probability level.CV - coefficient of variation.OSL - observed significance level, or probability of a greater F value.LSD - least significant difference at the 0.05 level, † indicates significance at the 0.10 level, NS - not significant.Note: some columns may not add up due to rounding error.Netvalue987.668.10.0009136.25Table 5. Harvest results from the Large Plot Irrigated Cotton Variety Trial, Dudley Ponhert Farm, Carson County, TX, 2012.-------- % -------- ------------- lb/acre ------------- $/lb ------------------------------------------------- $/acre -------------------------------------------------107Deltapine 104B2RF 35.8 51.5 5400 1932 2780 0.5397 1042.89 347.53 1390.41 161.99 98.60 1129.83 aFiberMax 9250GL 34.5 50.0 5529 1906 2763 0.5263 1003.25 345.32 1348.57 165.88 92.62 1090.07 abFiberMax 2011GT 34.9 47.2 5420 1893 2558 0.5168 978.50 319.81 1298.31 162.61 89.35 1046.35 abcNexGen 2051B2RF 32.8 49.7 5436 1782 2700 0.5362 955.33 337.44 1292.77 163.08 93.54 1036.16 abcNexGen 1551RF 32.2 51.1 5064 1629 2586 0.5710 930.41 323.28 1253.68 151.92 76.01 1025.76 abcAll-Tex Edge B2RF 31.6 50.5 5420 1710 2736 0.5397 922.77 342.00 1264.76 162.59 97.82 1004.35 abcFiberMax 9180B2F 34.9 48.8 5245 1831 2561 0.5080 930.25 320.11 1250.37 157.36 104.69 988.31 bcDeltapine 1212B2RF 30.9 47.5 5436 1678 2581 0.5487 920.44 322.57 1243.01 163.08 102.34 977.59 bcFiberMax 9058F 34.1 48.0 4910 1673 2356 0.5505 920.73 294.47 1215.20 147.29 92.81 975.10 bcPhytoGen 367WRF 31.5 48.4 5363 1688 2597 0.5167 872.11 324.59 1196.70 160.90 105.43 930.37 cNexGen 3348B2RF 29.7 49.5 5146 1528 2547 0.5547 847.65 318.42 1166.07 154.37 93.54 918.17 cDeltapine 1219B2RF 29.8 46.6 4864 1450 2266 0.4765 691.09 283.27 974.36 145.93 98.60 729.84 dAssumes:$3.00/cwt ginning cost.$250/ton for seed.Value for lint based on CCC loan value from grab samples and FBRI HVI results.
units 32 nds inch % g/tex % grade reflectance yellowness color 1 color 2Test average 3.2 37.3 80.8 32.3 9.3 3.0 78.5 8.1 2.0 1.0CV, % 10.5 1.5 0.9 2.7 8.1 -- 1.8 4.3 -- --OSL 0.0029 0.0077 0.0016 0.0003 0.0825 † -- 0.2558 0.0001 -- --LSD 0.6 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.1 -- NS 0.6 -- --CV - coefficient of variation.OSL - observed significance level, or probability of a greater F value.LSD - least significant difference at the 0.05 level, † indicates significance at the 0.10 level, NS - not significantTable 6. HVI fiber property results from the Large Plot Irrigated Cotton Variety Trial, Dudley Ponhert Farm, Carson County, TX, 2012.Entry Micronaire Staple Uniformity Strength Elongation Leaf Rd +bColor grade108All-Tex Edge B2RF 3.3 36.8 79.5 29.9 8.9 3.0 78.2 7.1 2.0 1.0Deltapine 104B2RF 3.1 37.0 82.2 33.2 9.9 3.0 79.1 7.9 2.0 1.0Deltapine 1212B2RF 3.3 37.9 81.9 32.8 9.9 3.0 77.1 8.1 2.0 1.0Deltapine 1219B2RF 2.6 38.1 79.9 33.9 9.0 3.0 79.8 8.6 2.0 1.0FiberMax 2011GT 3.0 37.6 80.7 31.8 9.1 3.0 79.1 7.8 2.0 1.0FiberMax 9058F 3.4 36.9 81.2 31.1 9.8 3.0 78.9 8.2 2.0 1.0FiberMax 9180B2F 2.9 38.4 81.2 32.9 8.8 3.0 79.6 8.0 2.0 1.0FiberMax 9250GL 3.0 36.8 80.0 32.5 8.0 3.0 78.2 8.1 2.0 1.0NexGen 1551RF 4.1 36.3 81.1 33.6 9.2 3.0 76.6 8.3 2.0 1.0NexGen 2051B2RF 3.2 37.2 80.3 30.9 8.8 3.0 78.5 7.6 2.0 1.0NexGen 3348B2RF 3.3 37.2 81.4 32.6 9.4 3.0 78.6 8.3 2.0 1.0PhytoGen 367WRF 2.9 37.2 80.3 31.9 10.2 3.0 78.9 9.1 2.0 1.0* - leaf grades set at 3 and color grades set at 21 for all varieties.
Page 2 and 3:
Systems Agronomic and EconomicEvalu
Page 4 and 5:
Scott Russell, EA-IPM, Terry/Yoakum
Page 6 and 7:
Replicated No-Till LESA Irrigated R
Page 8 and 9:
Agronomic and Economic Evaluation o
Page 10:
andomized complete block design was
Page 14 and 15:
not significant at this location. H
Page 16 and 17:
Table 1. Inseason plant measurement
Page 18 and 19:
Table 3. HVI fiber property results
Page 20 and 21:
Entry Lint Seed Bur cotton Lint See
Page 22 and 23:
Table 7. Inseason plant measurement
Page 24 and 25:
Table 9. Final plant map results fr
Page 26 and 27:
Table 11. HVI fiber property result
Page 28 and 29:
Replicated LESA Irrigated RACE Vari
Page 30 and 31:
Results and Discussion:Agronomic da
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Replicated Sub-Surface Drip Irrigat
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Replicated LEPA Irrigated RACE Vari
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Replicated LESA Irrigated RACE Vari
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Replicated Sub-Surface Drip Irrigat
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65: Replicated Sub-Surface Drip Irrigat
Page 66 and 67: Results and Discussion:Agronomic da
Page 68 and 69: Table 2. Final plant map results fr
Page 70 and 71: Entry Lint Seed Bur cotton Lint See
Page 72 and 73: Replicated LESA Irrigated RACE Vari
Page 80 and 81: Replicated No-Till LESA Irrigated R
Page 82 and 83: Results and Discussion:Acknowledgme
Page 88 and 89: Replicated LESA Irrigated RACE Vari
Page 96 and 97: Replicated LEPA Supplemental (Limit
Page 98 and 99: lb/acre for FiberMax 2989GLB2. Lint
Page 100 and 101: Table 2. HVI fiber property results
Page 102 and 103: Texas Panhandle Cotton Variety Tria
Page 104 and 105: Biopolymer Research Institue for HV
Page 106 and 107: Location 2 - DumasAt the Dumas loca
Page 108 and 109: cotton yields to determine lint and
Page 118 and 119: Replicated Dryland LargePlot Demons
Page 120 and 121: Insecticides:Fertilizer management:
Page 126 and 127: Replicated Dryland Cotton Variety T
Page 128 and 129: Results and Discussion:Significant
Page 130 and 131: Table 2. HVI fiber property results
Page 132 and 133: 125Plains Dryland Systems Variety T
Page 134 and 135: 127Blanco Dryland Systems Variety T
Page 136 and 137: 129Dawson County Dryland RACE Demon
Page 138 and 139: 131Lynn County Irrigated RACE Demon
Page 140 and 141: Subsurface Drip Irrigation Pre-plan
Page 142 and 143: Effects of Variable In-Season Irrig
Page 144 and 145: Table 1. Response of commercially a
Page 146 and 147: Table 1. cont. †BrandVarietyVerti
Page 148 and 149: There were six locations planted in
Page 150 and 151: Table 2. HVI ratings for varieties
Page 152 and 153: Table 4. HVI ratings for varieties
Page 154 and 155: Table 6. Effect of variety on HVI r
Page 156 and 157: Table 7. cont.Variety bRel.ValueRan
Page 158 and 159: High Plains (TASS 1N and 1S)Planted
Page 160 and 161: Lubbock Air TemperaturesMay, 2012Te
Page 162 and 163: Lubbock Air TemperaturesSeptember,
Page 164 and 165:
Precipitation (inches)4.0LTA20123.0
Page 166 and 167:
Are side-by-side plots more valuabl
Page 168:
Is a one-year test valid, or are se
show all

Systems Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Cotton Varieties in ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?