131 LA UR 03 5862 - National Nuclear Security Administration ...

Table 2.7.3-1. TFF (TA-35)/Operations DataPARAMETER UNITSSWEISROD1998YEARBOOK1999YEARBOOK2000YEARBOOK2001YEARBOOK2002YEARBOOKRadiological Air Ci/yr Negligible Not measured Not measured a Not measured b Not measured b Not measured bEmissionsNPDESDischarge:4A-127 MGY 0 Eliminated c Eliminated Eliminated Eliminated EliminatedWastes:Chemical kg/yr 3,800 2,827 594 1,062 668 904LLW m 3 /yr 10 0 0 0 0.2 0.4MLLW m 3 /yr 0.4 0 0 0 0 0TRU m 3 /yr 0 0 0 0 0 0Mixed TRU m 3 /yr 0 0 0 0 0 0Number of FTEs 98 d 57 d 54 dWorkers 54 d 52 d 54 d 53 dabcdPotential emissions during 1999 were sufficiently small that measurement systems were not necessary to meetregulatory or facility requirements.The emissions continue to be sufficiently low that monitoring is not required.Outfall eliminated before 1999: 04A-127 (TA-35).The first number shown in the “SWEIS ROD” column is the actual employee count representing CY 1999 (the yearthe SWEIS ROD was published). The second number shown in the “SWEIS ROD” column is the index numberrepresenting CY 1999 (the year the SWEIS ROD was published). The number of employees for CY 1998 throughCY 2002 operations cannot be directly compared to numbers projected by the SWEIS ROD. The employee numbersprojected by the SWEIS ROD represent total workforce size and include PTLA, JCNNM, and other subcontractorpersonnel. The number of employees for 1998 through 2002 operations is routinely collected information and representsonly UC employees (regular full-time and part-time). Because the two sets of numbers (SWEIS ROD versus the newindex) do not represent the same entity, a direct comparison to numbers projected by the SWEIS ROD (see Section3.6, Socioeconomics) is not appropriate. However, because this index is going to be used in each subsequentYearbook, selecting CY 1999 as the base year establishes an index that can be compared over the ten-year windowrepresented by the SWEIS ROD.2.7.4 Cerro Grande Fire Effects at the Target Fabrication FacilityPrograms at TFF suffered substantial downtime and loss of productivity during the evacuation and initialdamage assessment, recovery, and reentry phases. Lost time because of the fire resulted in the TFF beingavailable only about 93 percent of the planned operational days in 2000 while the target assembly area wasonly available about 88 percent. No direct fire damage occurred; however, some equipment was damagedbecause of fluctuating power and loss of liquid nitrogen cooling. Additionally, smoke damage to work areasand air handling systems was sufficient to prevent use of the Target Assembly area. The Target AssemblyTeam relocated to Sandia National Laboratories for a two-week period while their work areas and air handlingsystems were cleaned and repaired.SWEIS Yearbook—2002 2-87