131 LA UR 03 5862 - National Nuclear Security Administration ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

2-6Table 2.0-6. TRU Waste Generation at LANL by Facility (in m 3 /yr)FACILITY SWEIS ROD 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002TOTAL(1998–2002)2.1 Plutonium Complex 237 73.3 94 54.1 35.6 40.6 297.92.2 Tritium Facility 0 0 0 0 0 0 02.3 CMR Building 28 12.7 8.9 24.8 46.5 10.2 103.12.4 Pajarito Site 0 0 0 0 0 0 02.5 Sigma Complex 0 0 0 0 0 0 02.6 MSL 0 0 0 0 0 0 02.7 TFF 0 0 0 0 0 0 02.8 Machine Shops 0 0 0 0 0 0 02.9 High Explosives Processing 0 0 0 0 0 0 02.10 High Explosives Testing (Listed as TRU/Mixed TRU) 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 02.11 LANSCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 02.12 Bioscience Facilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 02.13 Radiochemistry Facility 0 0.2 0 0 0 0 0.22.14 RLWTF 30 1 0 16.1 0.4 1.9 19.42.15 Solid Radioactive and Chemical Waste Facilities 27 20.9 39.9 27.1 9.7 29.5 127.1Total of TRU Waste for Key Facilities 322.2 108.1 143.2 122.1 92.2 82.2 547.82.16 Non-Key Facilities 0 0 0 2.7 24.8 36.8 64.3Total of TRU Waste for Key and Non-Key Facilities 322.2 108.1 143.2 124.8 117.0 119.1 612.2Percentage of Total from Key Facilities 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97.8% 78.8% 68.9% 89.5%2.17 ER Project 11 0 0 0 0 0 0Total of TRU Waste for Non-Key and ER Project Facilities 11 0 0 2.7 24.8 36.8 64.3Total TRU = Key + Non-Key and ER Project Facilities 333.2 108.1 143.2 124.8 117.0 119.1 612.2Percentage of Total from Key Facilities 96.7% 100% 100% 97.8% 78.8% 69.0% 89.5%SWEIS Yearbook—2002
SWEIS Yearbook—2002 2-7Table 2.0-7. Mixed TRU Waste Generation at LANL by Facility (in m 3 /yr)FACILITY SWEIS ROD 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002TOTAL(1998–2002)2.1 Plutonium Complex 102 16.8 66 16.8 29.6 54.9 184.12.2 Tritium Facility 0 0 0 0 0 0 02.3 CMR Building 13 15.8 1.9 1 0.8 16.7 36.22.4 Pajarito Site 0 0 0 0 0 0 02.5 Sigma Complex 0 0 0 0 0 0 02.6 MSL 0 0 0 0 0 0 02.7 TFF 0 0 0 0 0 0 02.8 Machine Shops 0 0 0 0 0 0 02.9 High Explosives Processing 0 0 0 0 0 0 02.10 High Explosives Testing (Listed as TRU/Mixed TRU) 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 02.11 LANSCE 0 0 0 0 0 0 02.12 Bioscience Facilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 02.13 Radiochemistry Facility 0 0 0 0 0 0 02.14 RLWTF 0 1.4 4.8 0 4.4 0.2 10.82.15 Solid Radioactive and Chemical Waste Facilities 0 0 0 7.8 13.1 15.1 36Total of Mixed TRU Waste for Key Facilities 115.2 34.0 72.2 25.6 47.9 86.8 266.52.16 Non-Key Facilities 0 0 15 63 00.21 78.21Total of Mixed TRU Waste for Key and Non-Key Facilities 115.2 34.0 87.2 88.6 47.9 87.01 344.71Percentage of Total from Key Facilities 100.0% 100.0% 83.8% 28.9% 100.0% 99.8% 77.3%2.17 ER Project 0 0 0 0 0.2 00.2Total of Mixed TRU Waste for Non-Key and ER Project Facilities 0 0 15 63 0.2 0.21 78.41Total Mixed TRU = Key + Non-Key and ER Project 115.2 34.0 87.2 88.6 48.1 87.01 344.91Percentage of Total from Key Facilities 100% 100% 82.8% 28.9% 99.6% 99.8% 77.3%
Page 1: SWEIS Yearbook - 2002LA-UR-03-5862
Page 5: CONTENTSList of Tables . . . . . .
Page 11 and 12: 2.13-1. Radiochemistry Buildings wi
Page 13 and 14: F-1. RTBF Line Item Projects . . .
Page 15 and 16: AcronymsAFCIALARAAOCBABSLCASACDCCDI
Page 17 and 18: PrefaceIn the Record of Decision fo
Page 19 and 20: Executive SummaryIn 1999, the US De
Page 21 and 22: Also, following the events of Septe
Page 23 and 24: ReferencesDepartment of Energy, 199
Page 26 and 27: AREA OF CONTRIBUTION (continued)Los
Page 28 and 29: • Summary and conclusion (Chapter
Page 30 and 31: Aerial view-North from Pajarito Roa
Page 32 and 33: Table 2.0-2. Radiological Exposure
Page 34 and 35: 2-4Table 2.0-4. Low-Level Waste Gen
Page 38 and 39: 2-8Table 2.0-8. Overall Solid Radio
Page 40 and 41: In addition, the Key Facilities (as
Page 42 and 43: 2-12SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table 2.0-
Page 48 and 49: Table 2.0-12. Projected Constructio
Page 60 and 61: This chapter also discusses Non-Key
Page 62 and 63: SANTA FENATIONALSANTA FENATIONAL FO
Page 64 and 65: 2.1 Plutonium Complex (TA-55)The Pl
Page 66 and 67: 2-36SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table 2.1.
Page 72 and 73: 2-42Table 2.1.2-1. Plutonium Comple
Page 74 and 75: Glovebox linesWaste transfer2.1.4 C
Page 76 and 77: TA-16 during 1999, 2000, and 2001.
Page 80 and 81: 2.2.3 Operations Data for the Triti
Page 82 and 83: Tree-thinning operations on Two-Mil
Page 84 and 85: completed; work on the wing electri
Page 86 and 87:
2-56Table 2.3.1-1. CMR Building Con
Page 88 and 89:
2-58SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table 2.3.
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Table 2.3.2-1. CMR Building (TA-03)
Page 94 and 95:
Table 2.3.3-1. CMR Building (TA-03)
Page 96 and 97:
2.4.1 Construction and Modification
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
2-70Table 2.4.2-1. Pajarito Site (T
Page 102 and 103:
“Hummer”2.4.4 Cerro Grande Fire
Page 104 and 105:
2.5.1 Construction and Modification
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Table 2.5.3-1. Sigma Complex (TA-03
Page 110 and 111:
2-80Table 2.6.2-1. MSL (TA-03)/Comp
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
2.6.4 Cerro Grande Fire Effects at
Page 116 and 117:
2-86Table 2.7.2-1. TFF (TA-35)/Comp
Page 118 and 119:
Inspection of target component2.8 M
Page 120 and 121:
2.8.2 Operations at the Machine Sho
Page 122 and 123:
Table 2.8.3-1. Machine Shops (TA-03
Page 124 and 125:
Operations at this Key Facility are
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
2.9.2 Operations at High Explosives
Page 130 and 131:
2-100SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table 2.9
Page 132 and 133:
Table 2.9.3-1. High Explosives Proc
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
2.10.2 Operations at High Explosive
Page 138 and 139:
2-108Table 2.10.2-1. High Explosive
Page 140 and 141:
Table 2.10.3-1. High Explosives Tes
Page 142 and 143:
DX Division Strategic Plan for the
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
2-116Table 2.11.1-1. Los Alamos Neu
Page 148 and 149:
Table 2.11.2-1. Los Alamos Neutron
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
2-122Table 2.11.2-1. Los Alamos Neu
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
2.12 Bioscience Facilities (TA-43,
Page 158 and 159:
Because of the building’s small s
Page 160 and 161:
is expected to continue through 200
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
2-134Table 2.12.3-1. Bioscience Fac
Page 166 and 167:
Table 2.13-1. Radiochemistry Buildi
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Table 2.13.2-1. Radiochemistry Faci
Page 172 and 173:
Table 2.13.3-1. Radiochemistry Faci
Page 174 and 175:
Table 2.14-1. Radioactive Liquid Wa
Page 176 and 177:
2.14.2 Operations at the Radioactiv
Page 178 and 179:
Table 2.14.2-1. Radioactive Liquid
Page 180 and 181:
Table 2.14.3-1. Radioactive Liquid
Page 182 and 183:
Table 2.15-1. Solid Radioactive and
Page 184 and 185:
volume is an increase from the last
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
2-160Table 2.15.2-1. Solid Radioact
Page 192 and 193:
2.16 Non-Key FacilitiesThe balance,
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
2-166Table 2.16.1-1. Non-Key Facili
Page 198 and 199:
consumption would represent approxi
Page 200 and 201:
Exterior and interior views of the
Page 202 and 203:
Decision Applications Division Offi
Page 204 and 205:
k) Materials Science and Technology
Page 206 and 207:
n) NPDES Outfall ProjectDuring 1997
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
2.17 Environmental Restoration Proj
Page 212 and 213:
The sludge and water in the lagoons
Page 214 and 215:
Table 2.17.3-1. Evaluated and Stabi
Page 216 and 217:
2.18 ReferencesDepartment of Energy
Page 218 and 219:
Department of Energy, 1999d. “Cat
Page 220 and 221:
Katzman, 2000. Personal communicati
Page 222 and 223:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, 200
Page 224 and 225:
Table 3.1.1-1 summarizes the radioa
Page 226 and 227:
for reporting under Section 313 of
Page 228 and 229:
NPDES permitted outfalls, including
Page 230 and 231:
Table 3.2-4. Discharges from NPDES
Page 232 and 233:
ensures that LANL meets all require
Page 234 and 235:
3.3.3 Low-Level Radioactive WastesT
Page 236 and 237:
Table 3.3.5-1. Transuranic Waste Ge
Page 238 and 239:
Power Plant ComplexIn CY 2002, an e
Page 240 and 241:
3.4.3 WaterBefore September 8, 1998
Page 242 and 243:
Table 3.5.2-1. Radiological Exposur
Page 244 and 245:
These employees have had a positive
Page 246 and 247:
3.7.1 Land Resources—CY 1998From
Page 248 and 249:
Table 3.7.5-1. Site-wide Land UseAC
Page 250 and 251:
Table 3.8-1. Groundwater Characteri
Page 252 and 253:
captured in the Laboratory’s annu
Page 254 and 255:
828 ft. One sample of water from th
Page 256 and 257:
Table3.9-2. HistoricPeriodCulturalR
Page 258 and 259:
Traditional Cultural Properties Com
Page 260 and 261:
2002 Land TransferredNine cultural
Page 262 and 263:
During 2002, LANL completed three b
Page 264 and 265:
Lansford, R., L. Adcock, S. Ben-Dav
Page 266 and 267:
Wetland in Mortandad Canyon3-44SWEI
Page 268 and 269:
years for which data were reported;
Page 270 and 271:
Figure 4-4. Carbon monoxide emissio
Page 272 and 273:
The SWEIS assumed that reducing out
Page 274 and 275:
Sanitary WasteLANL sanitary waste g
Page 276 and 277:
Low-Level WasteLANL generation of L
Page 278 and 279:
4.4 Utility ConsumptionConsumption
Page 280 and 281:
TRI(UC Workers Only)TRI(All Workers
Page 282 and 283:
Though construction and modificatio
Page 284 and 285:
LANL has also increased the invento
Page 286 and 287:
4.13 ReferencesClean Air Act. 42 US
Page 288 and 289:
The PastV-Site building related to
Page 290 and 291:
5.1.2 AssumptionsThe Laboratory use
Page 292 and 293:
Figure 5-1. Existing land use at LA
Page 294 and 295:
Table 5.2.3.1-1. Site-Wide Land Use
Page 296 and 297:
• Manhattan Monument tract, a fra
Page 298 and 299:
Table 5.2.4-2. Selected Proposed Co
Page 300 and 301:
infrastructure required to conduct
Page 302 and 303:
Page 304 and 305:
5.4 The Plan5.4.1 Planning ProcessT
Page 306 and 307:
Table 5.4.3-1. Electrical Power Con
Page 308 and 309:
easily provide forecasted water dem
Page 310 and 311:
• Fire Hazard Mitigation: Facilit
Page 312 and 313:
Table 5.5.1-1. Funding SourcesFUNDI
Page 314 and 315:
Emergency Operations Center (above
Page 316 and 317:
5.6 ReferencesAmerican Standard of
Page 318 and 319:
5-30SWEIS Yearbook—2002
Page 320 and 321:
• Construction of the DecisionApp
Page 322 and 323:
projected by the ROD. Similarly, a
Page 324 and 325:
6.2 ConclusionsIn conclusion, LANL
Page 326 and 327:
6-8SWEIS Yearbook—2002
Page 328 and 329:
A-2Table A-1. Chemistry and Metallu
Page 330 and 331:
A-4Table A-2. Bioscience Air Emissi
Page 332 and 333:
A-6SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table A-3.
Page 334 and 335:
Page 336 and 337:
A-10Table A-6. Machine Shops Air Em
Page 338 and 339:
Page 340 and 341:
Page 342 and 343:
A-16SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table A-10
Page 344 and 345:
Page 346 and 347:
A-20Table A-10. Radiochemistry Site
Page 348 and 349:
A-22Table A-11. Sigma Complex Air E
Page 350 and 351:
Page 352 and 353:
A-26Table A-13. Tritium Operations
Page 354 and 355:
Page 356 and 357:
Table B-1. Comparison of Nuclear Fa
Page 358 and 359:
B-4Table B-1. Comparison of Nuclear
Page 360 and 361:
Page 362 and 363:
B-8SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table B-1.
Page 364 and 365:
B-10SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table B-1.
Page 366 and 367:
Page 368 and 369:
Page 370 and 371:
Table C-1. Radiological Facility Li
Page 372 and 373:
Appendix D. NPDES Outfall Status Su
Page 374 and 375:
Appendix D. NPDES Outfall Status Su
Page 376 and 377:
D-6SWEIS Yearbook—2002
Page 378 and 379:
Site Boundary ChangesOn December 11
Page 380 and 381:
Figure E-2a. TA-55 old evaluationbo
Page 382 and 383:
Table E-1. Land Parcels Transferred
Page 384 and 385:
Figure E-3. Location of transfer pa
Page 386 and 387:
References and Key Information Sour
Page 388 and 389:
F-2SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table F-1.
Page 390 and 391:
Page 392 and 393:
Page 394 and 395:
Page 396 and 397:
Page 398 and 399:
Page 400 and 401:
Page 402 and 403:
Page 404 and 405:
Page 406 and 407:
F-20Table F-5. Non-RTBF Non-Facilit
Page 408 and 409:
F-22Table F-6. Non-RTBF Non-Facilit
Page 410 and 411:
Page 412:
To obtain a copy of the SWEIS Yearb
show all

131 LA UR 03 5862 - National Nuclear Security Administration ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?