131 LA UR 03 5862 - National Nuclear Security Administration ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

A-4Table A-2. Bioscience Air Emissions (continued)KEYFACILITYCASNUMBER1999ESTIMATEDAIREMISSIONS1999USAGE2000ESTIMATEDAIREMISSIONS2000USAGE2001ESTIMATEDAIREMISSIONS2001USAGE2002ESTIMATEDAIREMISSIONS2002USAGECHEMICAL NAMEUNITSIso-Amyl Alcohol 123-51-3 kg/yr 0.7 2.0 0.11 0.32Isopropyl Alcohol 67-63-0 kg/yr 21.9 62.4 25.07 71.63 16.91 48.31 18.83 53.81Mercury, numerous forms 7439-97-6 kg/yr 0.0 0.5Methyl Alcohol 67-56-1 kg/yr 28.5 81.3 18.30 52.30 25.73 73.52 26.31 75.18Methylamine 74-89-5 kg/yr 0.32 0.90Methylene Chloride 75-09-2 kg/yr 16.9 48.4 0.98 2.79n,n-Dimethylformamide 68-12-2 kg/yr 0.6 1.6 0.33 0.95 0.17 0.47 0.25 0.71n-Butyl Alcohol 71-36-3 kg/yr 0.6 1.6Nitric Acid 7697-37-2 kg/yr 0.27 0.76 2.67 7.63 0.27 0.76Paraffin Wax Fume 8002-74-2 kg/yr 0.2 0.5Phenol 108-95-2 kg/yr 1.9 5.6 0.63 1.80 0.68 1.95 0.30 0.85Phosphoric Acid 7664-38-2 kg/yr 1.0 3.0 0.32 0.92 0.32 0.92 0.32 0.92Potassium Hydroxide <strong>131</strong>0-58-3 kg/yr 0.2 0.5 0.18 0.50 0.18 0.53 0.70 2.00Sec-Butyl Alcohol 105-46-4 kg/yr 0.1 0.4Sulfuric Acid 7664-93-9 kg/yr 1.7 4.8 0.65 1.84 0.64 1.84tert-Butyl Alcohol 75-65-0 kg/yr 0.28 0.79 0.14 0.39Tetrahydrofuran 109-99-9 kg/yr 17.2 49.2Tetrasodium Pyrophosphate 7722-88-5 kg/yr 0.2 0.5 0.18 0.50Thioglycolic Acid 68-11-1 kg/yr 0.23 0.66 0.47 1.35Trichloroacetic Acid 76-<strong>03</strong>-9 kg/yr 4.9 14.0 0.53 1.50 0.21 0.60Xylene (o-,m-,p-Isomers) 1330-20-7 kg/yr 0.2 0.4Zinc Chloride Fume 7646-85-7 kg/yr 0.4 1.2SWEIS Yearbook—2002
SWEIS Yearbook—2002 A-5Table A-3. High Explosive Processing Air Emissions1999ESTIMATEDAIREMISSIONS2000ESTIMATEDAIREMISSIONS2001ESTIMATEDAIREMISSIONS2002ESTIMATEDAIREMISSIONSKEYFACILITY CHEMICAL NAMECASNUMBER UNITS1999USAGE2000USAGE2001USAGE2002USAGEHighExplosiveProcessing Acetic Acid 64-19-7 kg/yr 14.7 42.0Acetone 67-64-1 kg/yr 66.4 189.8 3.32 9.50 113.08 323.07 66.63 190.37Acetonitrile 75-05-8 kg/yr 16.2 46.3Acetylene 74-86-2 kg/yr 7.7 22.0Carbon Black 1333-86-4 kg/yr 0.4 1.0Chlorodifluoromethane 74-45-6 kg/yr 168.3 480.8Chloroform 67-66-3 kg/yr 1.0 3.0 0.52 1.48Chromic acids and chromates 1333-82-0 kg/yr 0.2 0.5Copper 7440-50-8 kg/yr 0.0 0.5Cyclohexane 110-82-7 kg/yr 0.1 0.4Cyclohexanone 108-94-1 kg/yr 0.3 0.9Dichlorodifluoromethane 75-71-8 kg/yr 0.1 0.2Ethanol 64-17-5 kg/yr 174.6 498.7 0.83 2.37 60.22 172.06 0.60 1.72Ethyl Acetate 141-78-6 kg/yr 65.92 188.34Ethyl Ether 60-29-7 kg/yr 1.5 4.2Ethylene Dichloride 107-06-2 kg/yr 8.6 24.7 0.43 1.24Fluorine 7782-41-4 kg/yr 2.52 7.20Hexane (other isomers)* or n-Hexane 110-54-3 kg/yr 0.12 0.33Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0 kg/yr 11.9 34.1 9.58 27.36 6.23 17.81Hydrogen Fluoride, as F 7664-39-3 kg/yr 0.2 0.4Hydrogen Peroxide 7722-84-1 kg/yr 15.8 45.0Isobutyl Alcohol 78-83-1 kg/yr 0.53 1.52Isopropyl Alcohol 67-63-0 kg/yr 5.5 15.6 5.51 15.74 2.20 6.28 4.40 12.57Lead, el. and compounds, asPb 7439-92-1 kg/yr 0.05 4.54Mercury, numerous forms 7439-97-6 kg/yr 0.3 29.0Methyl Alcohol 67-56-1 kg/yr 37.3 106.4Methyl Cyclohexane 108-87-2 kg/yr 0.3 0.8
Page 1:
SWEIS Yearbook - 2002LA-UR-03-5862
Page 5:
CONTENTSList of Tables . . . . . .
Page 11 and 12:
2.13-1. Radiochemistry Buildings wi
Page 13 and 14:
F-1. RTBF Line Item Projects . . .
Page 15 and 16:
AcronymsAFCIALARAAOCBABSLCASACDCCDI
Page 17 and 18:
PrefaceIn the Record of Decision fo
Page 19 and 20:
Executive SummaryIn 1999, the US De
Page 21 and 22:
Also, following the events of Septe
Page 23 and 24:
ReferencesDepartment of Energy, 199
Page 26 and 27:
AREA OF CONTRIBUTION (continued)Los
Page 28 and 29:
• Summary and conclusion (Chapter
Page 30 and 31:
Aerial view-North from Pajarito Roa
Page 32 and 33:
Table 2.0-2. Radiological Exposure
Page 34 and 35:
2-4Table 2.0-4. Low-Level Waste Gen
Page 36 and 37:
2-6Table 2.0-6. TRU Waste Generatio
Page 38 and 39:
2-8Table 2.0-8. Overall Solid Radio
Page 40 and 41:
In addition, the Key Facilities (as
Page 42 and 43:
2-12SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table 2.0-
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Table 2.0-12. Projected Constructio
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
This chapter also discusses Non-Key
Page 62 and 63:
SANTA FENATIONALSANTA FENATIONAL FO
Page 64 and 65:
2.1 Plutonium Complex (TA-55)The Pl
Page 66 and 67:
2-36SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table 2.1.
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
2-42Table 2.1.2-1. Plutonium Comple
Page 74 and 75:
Glovebox linesWaste transfer2.1.4 C
Page 76 and 77:
TA-16 during 1999, 2000, and 2001.
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
2.2.3 Operations Data for the Triti
Page 82 and 83:
Tree-thinning operations on Two-Mil
Page 84 and 85:
completed; work on the wing electri
Page 86 and 87:
2-56Table 2.3.1-1. CMR Building Con
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Table 2.3.2-1. CMR Building (TA-03)
Page 94 and 95:
Table 2.3.3-1. CMR Building (TA-03)
Page 96 and 97:
2.4.1 Construction and Modification
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
2-70Table 2.4.2-1. Pajarito Site (T
Page 102 and 103:
“Hummer”2.4.4 Cerro Grande Fire
Page 104 and 105:
2.5.1 Construction and Modification
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Table 2.5.3-1. Sigma Complex (TA-03
Page 110 and 111:
2-80Table 2.6.2-1. MSL (TA-03)/Comp
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
2.6.4 Cerro Grande Fire Effects at
Page 116 and 117:
2-86Table 2.7.2-1. TFF (TA-35)/Comp
Page 118 and 119:
Inspection of target component2.8 M
Page 120 and 121:
2.8.2 Operations at the Machine Sho
Page 122 and 123:
Table 2.8.3-1. Machine Shops (TA-03
Page 124 and 125:
Operations at this Key Facility are
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
2.9.2 Operations at High Explosives
Page 130 and 131:
2-100SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table 2.9
Page 132 and 133:
Table 2.9.3-1. High Explosives Proc
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
2.10.2 Operations at High Explosive
Page 138 and 139:
2-108Table 2.10.2-1. High Explosive
Page 140 and 141:
Table 2.10.3-1. High Explosives Tes
Page 142 and 143:
DX Division Strategic Plan for the
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
2-116Table 2.11.1-1. Los Alamos Neu
Page 148 and 149:
Table 2.11.2-1. Los Alamos Neutron
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
2-122Table 2.11.2-1. Los Alamos Neu
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
2.12 Bioscience Facilities (TA-43,
Page 158 and 159:
Because of the building’s small s
Page 160 and 161:
is expected to continue through 200
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
2-134Table 2.12.3-1. Bioscience Fac
Page 166 and 167:
Table 2.13-1. Radiochemistry Buildi
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Table 2.13.2-1. Radiochemistry Faci
Page 172 and 173:
Table 2.13.3-1. Radiochemistry Faci
Page 174 and 175:
Table 2.14-1. Radioactive Liquid Wa
Page 176 and 177:
2.14.2 Operations at the Radioactiv
Page 178 and 179:
Table 2.14.2-1. Radioactive Liquid
Page 180 and 181:
Table 2.14.3-1. Radioactive Liquid
Page 182 and 183:
Table 2.15-1. Solid Radioactive and
Page 184 and 185:
volume is an increase from the last
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
2-160Table 2.15.2-1. Solid Radioact
Page 192 and 193:
2.16 Non-Key FacilitiesThe balance,
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
2-166Table 2.16.1-1. Non-Key Facili
Page 198 and 199:
consumption would represent approxi
Page 200 and 201:
Exterior and interior views of the
Page 202 and 203:
Decision Applications Division Offi
Page 204 and 205:
k) Materials Science and Technology
Page 206 and 207:
n) NPDES Outfall ProjectDuring 1997
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
2.17 Environmental Restoration Proj
Page 212 and 213:
The sludge and water in the lagoons
Page 214 and 215:
Table 2.17.3-1. Evaluated and Stabi
Page 216 and 217:
2.18 ReferencesDepartment of Energy
Page 218 and 219:
Department of Energy, 1999d. “Cat
Page 220 and 221:
Katzman, 2000. Personal communicati
Page 222 and 223:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, 200
Page 224 and 225:
Table 3.1.1-1 summarizes the radioa
Page 226 and 227:
for reporting under Section 313 of
Page 228 and 229:
NPDES permitted outfalls, including
Page 230 and 231:
Table 3.2-4. Discharges from NPDES
Page 232 and 233:
ensures that LANL meets all require
Page 234 and 235:
3.3.3 Low-Level Radioactive WastesT
Page 236 and 237:
Table 3.3.5-1. Transuranic Waste Ge
Page 238 and 239:
Power Plant ComplexIn CY 2002, an e
Page 240 and 241:
3.4.3 WaterBefore September 8, 1998
Page 242 and 243:
Table 3.5.2-1. Radiological Exposur
Page 244 and 245:
These employees have had a positive
Page 246 and 247:
3.7.1 Land Resources—CY 1998From
Page 248 and 249:
Table 3.7.5-1. Site-wide Land UseAC
Page 250 and 251:
Table 3.8-1. Groundwater Characteri
Page 252 and 253:
captured in the Laboratory’s annu
Page 254 and 255:
828 ft. One sample of water from th
Page 256 and 257:
Table3.9-2. HistoricPeriodCulturalR
Page 258 and 259:
Traditional Cultural Properties Com
Page 260 and 261:
2002 Land TransferredNine cultural
Page 262 and 263:
During 2002, LANL completed three b
Page 264 and 265:
Lansford, R., L. Adcock, S. Ben-Dav
Page 266 and 267:
Wetland in Mortandad Canyon3-44SWEI
Page 268 and 269:
years for which data were reported;
Page 270 and 271:
Figure 4-4. Carbon monoxide emissio
Page 272 and 273:
The SWEIS assumed that reducing out
Page 274 and 275:
Sanitary WasteLANL sanitary waste g
Page 276 and 277:
Low-Level WasteLANL generation of L
Page 278 and 279:
4.4 Utility ConsumptionConsumption
Page 280 and 281: TRI(UC Workers Only)TRI(All Workers
Page 282 and 283: Though construction and modificatio
Page 284 and 285: LANL has also increased the invento
Page 286 and 287: 4.13 ReferencesClean Air Act. 42 US
Page 288 and 289: The PastV-Site building related to
Page 290 and 291: 5.1.2 AssumptionsThe Laboratory use
Page 292 and 293: Figure 5-1. Existing land use at LA
Page 294 and 295: Table 5.2.3.1-1. Site-Wide Land Use
Page 296 and 297: • Manhattan Monument tract, a fra
Page 298 and 299: Table 5.2.4-2. Selected Proposed Co
Page 300 and 301: infrastructure required to conduct
Page 302 and 303: 5-14SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table 5.3.
Page 304 and 305: 5.4 The Plan5.4.1 Planning ProcessT
Page 306 and 307: Table 5.4.3-1. Electrical Power Con
Page 308 and 309: easily provide forecasted water dem
Page 310 and 311: • Fire Hazard Mitigation: Facilit
Page 312 and 313: Table 5.5.1-1. Funding SourcesFUNDI
Page 314 and 315: Emergency Operations Center (above
Page 316 and 317: 5.6 ReferencesAmerican Standard of
Page 318 and 319: 5-30SWEIS Yearbook—2002
Page 320 and 321: • Construction of the DecisionApp
Page 322 and 323: projected by the ROD. Similarly, a
Page 324 and 325: 6.2 ConclusionsIn conclusion, LANL
Page 326 and 327: 6-8SWEIS Yearbook—2002
Page 328 and 329: A-2Table A-1. Chemistry and Metallu
Page 332 and 333: A-6SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table A-3.
Page 336 and 337: A-10Table A-6. Machine Shops Air Em
Page 342 and 343: A-16SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table A-10
Page 346 and 347: A-20Table A-10. Radiochemistry Site
Page 348 and 349: A-22Table A-11. Sigma Complex Air E
Page 352 and 353: A-26Table A-13. Tritium Operations
Page 356 and 357: Table B-1. Comparison of Nuclear Fa
Page 358 and 359: B-4Table B-1. Comparison of Nuclear
Page 362 and 363: B-8SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table B-1.
Page 364 and 365: B-10SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table B-1.
Page 370 and 371: Table C-1. Radiological Facility Li
Page 372 and 373: Appendix D. NPDES Outfall Status Su
Page 374 and 375: Appendix D. NPDES Outfall Status Su
Page 376 and 377: D-6SWEIS Yearbook—2002
Page 378 and 379: Site Boundary ChangesOn December 11
Page 380 and 381:
Figure E-2a. TA-55 old evaluationbo
Page 382 and 383:
Table E-1. Land Parcels Transferred
Page 384 and 385:
Figure E-3. Location of transfer pa
Page 386 and 387:
References and Key Information Sour
Page 388 and 389:
F-2SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table F-1.
Page 390 and 391:
Page 392 and 393:
Page 394 and 395:
Page 396 and 397:
Page 398 and 399:
Page 400 and 401:
Page 402 and 403:
Page 404 and 405:
Page 406 and 407:
F-20Table F-5. Non-RTBF Non-Facilit
Page 408 and 409:
F-22Table F-6. Non-RTBF Non-Facilit
Page 410 and 411:
Page 412:
To obtain a copy of the SWEIS Yearb
show all

131 LA UR 03 5862 - National Nuclear Security Administration ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?