131 LA UR 03 5862 - National Nuclear Security Administration ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

A-24SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table A-12. Target Fabrication Facility Air Emissions (continued)KEYFACILITYCASNUMBER UNITS1999ESTIMATEDAIREMISSIONS1999USAGE2000ESTIMATEDAIREMISSIONS2000USAGE2001ESTIMATEDAIREMISSIONS2001USAGE2002ESTIMATEDAIREMISSIONS2002USAGECHEMICAL NAMEFormic Acid 64-18-6 kg/yr 0.32 0.92Hexane (other isomers)* orn-Hexane 110-54-3 kg/yr 0.46 1.32 0.49 1.39 1.85 5.28Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0 kg/yr 3.9 11.0 0.10 0.30Hydrogen Fluoride, as F 7664-39-3 kg/yr 0.3 1.0 0.32 0.91Hydrogen Peroxide 7722-84-1 kg/yr 0.2 0.7 1.72 4.92Isopropyl Alcohol 67-63-0 kg/yr 6.9 19.6 9.92 28.34 11.00 31.42 14.30 40.85Mercury numerous forms 7439-97-6 kg/yr 0.09 8.54Methyl Alcohol 67-56-1 kg/yr 12.1 34.7 14.43 41.24 18.84 53.82 6.65 18.99Methyl Cyclohexane 108-87-2 kg/yr 0.3 0.8Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK) 78-93-3 kg/yr 2.26 6.46 2.26 6.44 1.13 3.22Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 108-10-1 kg/yr 0.1 0.4Methyl Methacrylate 80-62-6 kg/yr 0.33 0.94Methylene BisphenylIsocyanate (MDI) 101-68-8 kg/yr 0.18 0.50Methylene Chloride 75-09-2 kg/yr 1.9 5.3 0.98 2.79Morpholine 110-91-8 kg/yr 0.35 1.00n,n-Dimethyl Acetamide orDimethyl Acetamide 127-19-5 kg/yr 0.3 0.9 0.99 2.83n,n-Dimethylformamide 68-12-2 kg/yr 12.3 35.1 6.65 19.01 10.63 30.36 6.64 18.97n-Amyl Acetate 628-63-7 kg/yr 0.3 0.9n-Butyl Acetate 123-86-4 kg/yr 0.2 0.4 0.61 1.75n-Heptane 142-82-5 kg/yr 1.0 2.7Nickel, metal (dust) orSoluble & Inorganic Comp. 7440-02-0 kg/yr 1.56 4.45Nitric Acid 7697-37-2 kg/yr 4.55 13.00 25.10 71.72 2.94 8.39Nitrous Oxide 10024-97-2 kg/yr 19.3 55.0o-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 kg/yr 1.00 2.87Osmium Tetroxide, as Os 20816-12-0 kg/yr 0.1 0.2Pentane (all isomers) 109-66-0 kg/yr 0.44 1.26Phosphoric Acid 7664-38-2 kg/yr 0.4 1.0
SWEIS Yearbook—2002 A-25Table A-12. Target Fabrication Facility Air Emissions (continued)KEYFACILITYCASNUMBER UNITS1999ESTIMATEDAIREMISSIONS1999USAGE2000ESTIMATEDAIREMISSIONS2000USAGE2001ESTIMATEDAIREMISSIONS2001USAGE2002ESTIMATEDAIREMISSIONS2002USAGECHEMICAL NAMEPhosphorus Pentachloride 10026-13-8 kg/yr 0.42 1.20Potassium Hydroxide 1310-58-3 kg/yr 0.4 1.0 2.29 6.54 5.45 15.58Propane 74-98-6 kg/yr 0.0 45.4Propyl Alcohol 71-23-8 kg/yr 0.3 0.8 0.14 0.40Pyridine 110-86-1 kg/yr0.33 0.93Silica, Quartz 14808-60-7 kg/yr 0.35 1.00Silicon Tetrahydride 7803-62-5 kg/yr 3.1 8.9Styrene 100-42-5 kg/yr 1.7 4.9 1.90 5.44Sulfur Hexafluoride 2551-62-4 kg/yr 9.7 27.7Sulfuric Acid 7664-93-9 kg/yr 4.8 13.8 69.38 198.22 1.42 4.05Tert-Butyl Alcohol 75-65-0 kg/yr 0.28 0.79Tetrahydrofuran 109-99-9 kg/yr 0.3 0.9 1.25 3.56 1.56 4.45Toluene 108-88-3 kg/yr 1.2 3.5 1.22 3.49Triethylamine 121-44-8 kg/yr 0.25 0.73Tungsten as W insolubleCompounds 7440-33-7 kg/yr 0.01 0.50VM & P Naphtha 8032-32-4 kg/yr 0.53 1.50 0.53 1.50Xylene (o-,m-,p-Isomers) 1330-20-7 kg/yr 0.91 2.59
Page 1:
SWEIS Yearbook - 2002LA-UR-03-5862
Page 5:
CONTENTSList of Tables . . . . . .
Page 11 and 12:
2.13-1. Radiochemistry Buildings wi
Page 13 and 14:
F-1. RTBF Line Item Projects . . .
Page 15 and 16:
AcronymsAFCIALARAAOCBABSLCASACDCCDI
Page 17 and 18:
PrefaceIn the Record of Decision fo
Page 19 and 20:
Executive SummaryIn 1999, the US De
Page 21 and 22:
Also, following the events of Septe
Page 23 and 24:
ReferencesDepartment of Energy, 199
Page 26 and 27:
AREA OF CONTRIBUTION (continued)Los
Page 28 and 29:
• Summary and conclusion (Chapter
Page 30 and 31:
Aerial view-North from Pajarito Roa
Page 32 and 33:
Table 2.0-2. Radiological Exposure
Page 34 and 35:
2-4Table 2.0-4. Low-Level Waste Gen
Page 36 and 37:
2-6Table 2.0-6. TRU Waste Generatio
Page 38 and 39:
2-8Table 2.0-8. Overall Solid Radio
Page 40 and 41:
In addition, the Key Facilities (as
Page 42 and 43:
2-12SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table 2.0-
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Table 2.0-12. Projected Constructio
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
This chapter also discusses Non-Key
Page 62 and 63:
SANTA FENATIONALSANTA FENATIONAL FO
Page 64 and 65:
2.1 Plutonium Complex (TA-55)The Pl
Page 66 and 67:
2-36SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table 2.1.
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
2-42Table 2.1.2-1. Plutonium Comple
Page 74 and 75:
Glovebox linesWaste transfer2.1.4 C
Page 76 and 77:
TA-16 during 1999, 2000, and 2001.
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
2.2.3 Operations Data for the Triti
Page 82 and 83:
Tree-thinning operations on Two-Mil
Page 84 and 85:
completed; work on the wing electri
Page 86 and 87:
2-56Table 2.3.1-1. CMR Building Con
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Table 2.3.2-1. CMR Building (TA-03)
Page 94 and 95:
Table 2.3.3-1. CMR Building (TA-03)
Page 96 and 97:
2.4.1 Construction and Modification
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
2-70Table 2.4.2-1. Pajarito Site (T
Page 102 and 103:
“Hummer”2.4.4 Cerro Grande Fire
Page 104 and 105:
2.5.1 Construction and Modification
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Table 2.5.3-1. Sigma Complex (TA-03
Page 110 and 111:
2-80Table 2.6.2-1. MSL (TA-03)/Comp
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
2.6.4 Cerro Grande Fire Effects at
Page 116 and 117:
2-86Table 2.7.2-1. TFF (TA-35)/Comp
Page 118 and 119:
Inspection of target component2.8 M
Page 120 and 121:
2.8.2 Operations at the Machine Sho
Page 122 and 123:
Table 2.8.3-1. Machine Shops (TA-03
Page 124 and 125:
Operations at this Key Facility are
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
2.9.2 Operations at High Explosives
Page 130 and 131:
2-100SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table 2.9
Page 132 and 133:
Table 2.9.3-1. High Explosives Proc
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
2.10.2 Operations at High Explosive
Page 138 and 139:
2-108Table 2.10.2-1. High Explosive
Page 140 and 141:
Table 2.10.3-1. High Explosives Tes
Page 142 and 143:
DX Division Strategic Plan for the
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
2-116Table 2.11.1-1. Los Alamos Neu
Page 148 and 149:
Table 2.11.2-1. Los Alamos Neutron
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
2-122Table 2.11.2-1. Los Alamos Neu
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
2.12 Bioscience Facilities (TA-43,
Page 158 and 159:
Because of the building’s small s
Page 160 and 161:
is expected to continue through 200
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
2-134Table 2.12.3-1. Bioscience Fac
Page 166 and 167:
Table 2.13-1. Radiochemistry Buildi
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Table 2.13.2-1. Radiochemistry Faci
Page 172 and 173:
Table 2.13.3-1. Radiochemistry Faci
Page 174 and 175:
Table 2.14-1. Radioactive Liquid Wa
Page 176 and 177:
2.14.2 Operations at the Radioactiv
Page 178 and 179:
Table 2.14.2-1. Radioactive Liquid
Page 180 and 181:
Table 2.14.3-1. Radioactive Liquid
Page 182 and 183:
Table 2.15-1. Solid Radioactive and
Page 184 and 185:
volume is an increase from the last
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
2-160Table 2.15.2-1. Solid Radioact
Page 192 and 193:
2.16 Non-Key FacilitiesThe balance,
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
2-166Table 2.16.1-1. Non-Key Facili
Page 198 and 199:
consumption would represent approxi
Page 200 and 201:
Exterior and interior views of the
Page 202 and 203:
Decision Applications Division Offi
Page 204 and 205:
k) Materials Science and Technology
Page 206 and 207:
n) NPDES Outfall ProjectDuring 1997
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
2.17 Environmental Restoration Proj
Page 212 and 213:
The sludge and water in the lagoons
Page 214 and 215:
Table 2.17.3-1. Evaluated and Stabi
Page 216 and 217:
2.18 ReferencesDepartment of Energy
Page 218 and 219:
Department of Energy, 1999d. “Cat
Page 220 and 221:
Katzman, 2000. Personal communicati
Page 222 and 223:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, 200
Page 224 and 225:
Table 3.1.1-1 summarizes the radioa
Page 226 and 227:
for reporting under Section 313 of
Page 228 and 229:
NPDES permitted outfalls, including
Page 230 and 231:
Table 3.2-4. Discharges from NPDES
Page 232 and 233:
ensures that LANL meets all require
Page 234 and 235:
3.3.3 Low-Level Radioactive WastesT
Page 236 and 237:
Table 3.3.5-1. Transuranic Waste Ge
Page 238 and 239:
Power Plant ComplexIn CY 2002, an e
Page 240 and 241:
3.4.3 WaterBefore September 8, 1998
Page 242 and 243:
Table 3.5.2-1. Radiological Exposur
Page 244 and 245:
These employees have had a positive
Page 246 and 247:
3.7.1 Land Resources—CY 1998From
Page 248 and 249:
Table 3.7.5-1. Site-wide Land UseAC
Page 250 and 251:
Table 3.8-1. Groundwater Characteri
Page 252 and 253:
captured in the Laboratory’s annu
Page 254 and 255:
828 ft. One sample of water from th
Page 256 and 257:
Table3.9-2. HistoricPeriodCulturalR
Page 258 and 259:
Traditional Cultural Properties Com
Page 260 and 261:
2002 Land TransferredNine cultural
Page 262 and 263:
During 2002, LANL completed three b
Page 264 and 265:
Lansford, R., L. Adcock, S. Ben-Dav
Page 266 and 267:
Wetland in Mortandad Canyon3-44SWEI
Page 268 and 269:
years for which data were reported;
Page 270 and 271:
Figure 4-4. Carbon monoxide emissio
Page 272 and 273:
The SWEIS assumed that reducing out
Page 274 and 275:
Sanitary WasteLANL sanitary waste g
Page 276 and 277:
Low-Level WasteLANL generation of L
Page 278 and 279:
4.4 Utility ConsumptionConsumption
Page 280 and 281:
TRI(UC Workers Only)TRI(All Workers
Page 282 and 283:
Though construction and modificatio
Page 284 and 285:
LANL has also increased the invento
Page 286 and 287:
4.13 ReferencesClean Air Act. 42 US
Page 288 and 289:
The PastV-Site building related to
Page 290 and 291:
5.1.2 AssumptionsThe Laboratory use
Page 292 and 293:
Figure 5-1. Existing land use at LA
Page 294 and 295:
Table 5.2.3.1-1. Site-Wide Land Use
Page 296 and 297:
• Manhattan Monument tract, a fra
Page 298 and 299:
Table 5.2.4-2. Selected Proposed Co
Page 300 and 301: infrastructure required to conduct
Page 302 and 303: 5-14SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table 5.3.
Page 304 and 305: 5.4 The Plan5.4.1 Planning ProcessT
Page 306 and 307: Table 5.4.3-1. Electrical Power Con
Page 308 and 309: easily provide forecasted water dem
Page 310 and 311: • Fire Hazard Mitigation: Facilit
Page 312 and 313: Table 5.5.1-1. Funding SourcesFUNDI
Page 314 and 315: Emergency Operations Center (above
Page 316 and 317: 5.6 ReferencesAmerican Standard of
Page 318 and 319: 5-30SWEIS Yearbook—2002
Page 320 and 321: • Construction of the DecisionApp
Page 322 and 323: projected by the ROD. Similarly, a
Page 324 and 325: 6.2 ConclusionsIn conclusion, LANL
Page 326 and 327: 6-8SWEIS Yearbook—2002
Page 328 and 329: A-2Table A-1. Chemistry and Metallu
Page 330 and 331: A-4Table A-2. Bioscience Air Emissi
Page 332 and 333: A-6SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table A-3.
Page 336 and 337: A-10Table A-6. Machine Shops Air Em
Page 342 and 343: A-16SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table A-10
Page 346 and 347: A-20Table A-10. Radiochemistry Site
Page 348 and 349: A-22Table A-11. Sigma Complex Air E
Page 352 and 353: A-26Table A-13. Tritium Operations
Page 356 and 357: Table B-1. Comparison of Nuclear Fa
Page 358 and 359: B-4Table B-1. Comparison of Nuclear
Page 362 and 363: B-8SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table B-1.
Page 364 and 365: B-10SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table B-1.
Page 370 and 371: Table C-1. Radiological Facility Li
Page 372 and 373: Appendix D. NPDES Outfall Status Su
Page 374 and 375: Appendix D. NPDES Outfall Status Su
Page 376 and 377: D-6SWEIS Yearbook—2002
Page 378 and 379: Site Boundary ChangesOn December 11
Page 380 and 381: Figure E-2a. TA-55 old evaluationbo
Page 382 and 383: Table E-1. Land Parcels Transferred
Page 384 and 385: Figure E-3. Location of transfer pa
Page 386 and 387: References and Key Information Sour
Page 388 and 389: F-2SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table F-1.
Page 400 and 401:
F-14SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table F-4.
Page 402 and 403:
Page 404 and 405:
Page 406 and 407:
F-20Table F-5. Non-RTBF Non-Facilit
Page 408 and 409:
F-22Table F-6. Non-RTBF Non-Facilit
Page 410 and 411:
Page 412:
To obtain a copy of the SWEIS Yearb
show all

131 LA UR 03 5862 - National Nuclear Security Administration ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?