131 LA UR 03 5862 - National Nuclear Security Administration ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

NPDES permitted outfalls, including which watershed each outfall discharges to, are provided in AppendixD.) In Table 3.2-2, the number of gallons of discharge per watershed projected by the SWEIS is comparedto the actual discharge per calendar year. Tables 3.2-3 and 3.2-4 compare the projected and actual number ofoutfalls by facility and the volume of discharge per facility projected by the SWEIS is compared to the actualdischarge per calendar year.Table 3.2-2. Discharges to Watersheds from NPDES Permitted Outfalls (Millions of Gallons)PROJECTEDDISCHARGE(SWEIS ROD)DISCHARGE DISCHARGE DISCHARGE DISCHARGEWATERSHED1998 19992000 2001Cañada del Buey 6.4 0 2.6 0 0 0Guaje 0.7 1.2 1.7 0 0 0Los Alamos 44.8 69.7 45.2 37.4 19.34 36.79Mortandad 37.4 51.4 39.3 31.6 4.21 31.40Pajarito 2.6 2.8 0 0 0 0Pueblo 1.0 0.7 0.9 0 0 0Sandia 170.8 67.1 213.2 180.2 100.38 108.58Water 14.2 18.7 14.3 16.2 0.102 1.41Totals 278.0 212.0 317.2 265.4 124.04 178.18DISCHARGE2002Of the 21 outfalls listed in the NPDES permit only 17 discharged during 2002, as was the case in 2001.Table 3.2-4 compares NPDES discharges by facility. The Non-Key Facilities showed a difference of about11.3 million gallons between CY 2002 discharges and SWEIS ROD projections (130.83 million gallonsversus 142.1 million gallons, respectively). For the Non-Key Facilities, discharge from Outfall 001 at theTA-03 power plant of 8.29 million gallons was higher than the 2001 discharge of 3.97 million gallons.Approximately 93 million gallons of the discharge from Outfall 001 at the power plant was attributableto treated sanitary effluent piped from Outfall 13S at TA-46 to TA-03 to be available as “makeup water”in the cooling towers. The combined flow of the sanitary waste treatment plant and the TA-3 steam plantaccount for about 77 percent of the total discharge from Non-Key Facilities and about 57 percent of all waterdischarged by the Laboratory.For Key Facilities, LANSCE discharged approximately 24 million gallons for 2002, about 4 milliongallons more than in 2001, accounting for about 51 percent of the total discharge from all Key Facilities (seeTable 3.2-4). This percentage has decreased from the almost 82 percent in 2001 because other Key Facilitiesexperienced an increase in discharge in 2002. The only Key Facilities to have decreased discharge in 2002were the High Explosives Processing Facility and the RLWTF.LANL has three principal wastewater treatment facilities—the sewage plant (Sanitary Wastewater System)at TA-46, the RLWTF at TA-50, and the HEWTF at TA-16. As discussed above, the sewage treatment plantat TA-46 processed about 93 million gallons of treated wastewater and sewage during 2002, all of whichwas pumped to the TA-3 power plant after treatment to provide makeup water for the cooling towers or to bedischarged directly into Sandia Canyon via Outfall 001.3-6SWEIS Yearbook—2002
SWEIS Yearbook—2002 3-7abTable 3.2-3. NPDES Permitted Outfalls by FacilityNUMBER OFOUTFALLSIDENTIFIEDIN SWEISNUMBER OFOUTFALLSPROJECTEDTO HAVE ADISCHARGE(SWEIS ROD)NUMBER OFPERMITTEDOUTFALLSAS OFJANUARY 1,1998NUMBER OFPERMITTEDOUTFALLSAS OFJANUARY 1,1999NUMBER OFPERMITTEDOUTFALLSAS OFJANUARY 1,2000NUMBER OFPERMITTEDOUTFALLSAS OFJANUARY 1,2001NUMBER OFPERMITTEDOUTFALLSAS OFJANUARY 1,2002NUMBER OFPERMITTEDOUTFALLSAS OFDECEMBER31, 2002FACILITYPlutonium1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1ComplexTritium Facility 5 2 3 2 2 2 2 2CMR Building 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Sigma Complex 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2High Explosives 22 11 16 3 3 3 3 3ProcessingHigh Explosives 15 7 10 3 2 2 2 2Testing aLANSCE 6 5 6 4 4 4 4 4HRL 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0Radiochemistry 5 2 3 1 0 0 0 0FacilityRLWTF 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Pajarito Site 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0MSL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TFF 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Machine Shops 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Waste0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0ManagementOperationsNon-Key27 22 22 17 4 4 5 5Facilities a, bTotals 87 55 66 36 20 20 21 21Outfall 03A-106 was incorrectly associated with a Non-Key Facility in the SWEIS. Starting with the 2002 Yearbook, Outfall 03A-106 is accounted for with HighExplosives Testing.The number of outfalls increased during CY 2001 with the addition of the new Outfall 03A-199 (permit issued 2/1/2001). Please note that earlier Yearbooksincorrectly indicated that this outfall was added to the NPDES Permit in 2000.
Page 1:
SWEIS Yearbook - 2002LA-UR-03-5862
Page 5:
CONTENTSList of Tables . . . . . .
Page 11 and 12:
2.13-1. Radiochemistry Buildings wi
Page 13 and 14:
F-1. RTBF Line Item Projects . . .
Page 15 and 16:
AcronymsAFCIALARAAOCBABSLCASACDCCDI
Page 17 and 18:
PrefaceIn the Record of Decision fo
Page 19 and 20:
Executive SummaryIn 1999, the US De
Page 21 and 22:
Also, following the events of Septe
Page 23 and 24:
ReferencesDepartment of Energy, 199
Page 26 and 27:
AREA OF CONTRIBUTION (continued)Los
Page 28 and 29:
• Summary and conclusion (Chapter
Page 30 and 31:
Aerial view-North from Pajarito Roa
Page 32 and 33:
Table 2.0-2. Radiological Exposure
Page 34 and 35:
2-4Table 2.0-4. Low-Level Waste Gen
Page 36 and 37:
2-6Table 2.0-6. TRU Waste Generatio
Page 38 and 39:
2-8Table 2.0-8. Overall Solid Radio
Page 40 and 41:
In addition, the Key Facilities (as
Page 42 and 43:
2-12SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table 2.0-
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Table 2.0-12. Projected Constructio
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
This chapter also discusses Non-Key
Page 62 and 63:
SANTA FENATIONALSANTA FENATIONAL FO
Page 64 and 65:
2.1 Plutonium Complex (TA-55)The Pl
Page 66 and 67:
2-36SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table 2.1.
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
2-42Table 2.1.2-1. Plutonium Comple
Page 74 and 75:
Glovebox linesWaste transfer2.1.4 C
Page 76 and 77:
TA-16 during 1999, 2000, and 2001.
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
2.2.3 Operations Data for the Triti
Page 82 and 83:
Tree-thinning operations on Two-Mil
Page 84 and 85:
completed; work on the wing electri
Page 86 and 87:
2-56Table 2.3.1-1. CMR Building Con
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Table 2.3.2-1. CMR Building (TA-03)
Page 94 and 95:
Table 2.3.3-1. CMR Building (TA-03)
Page 96 and 97:
2.4.1 Construction and Modification
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
2-70Table 2.4.2-1. Pajarito Site (T
Page 102 and 103:
“Hummer”2.4.4 Cerro Grande Fire
Page 104 and 105:
2.5.1 Construction and Modification
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Table 2.5.3-1. Sigma Complex (TA-03
Page 110 and 111:
2-80Table 2.6.2-1. MSL (TA-03)/Comp
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
2.6.4 Cerro Grande Fire Effects at
Page 116 and 117:
2-86Table 2.7.2-1. TFF (TA-35)/Comp
Page 118 and 119:
Inspection of target component2.8 M
Page 120 and 121:
2.8.2 Operations at the Machine Sho
Page 122 and 123:
Table 2.8.3-1. Machine Shops (TA-03
Page 124 and 125:
Operations at this Key Facility are
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
2.9.2 Operations at High Explosives
Page 130 and 131:
2-100SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table 2.9
Page 132 and 133:
Table 2.9.3-1. High Explosives Proc
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
2.10.2 Operations at High Explosive
Page 138 and 139:
2-108Table 2.10.2-1. High Explosive
Page 140 and 141:
Table 2.10.3-1. High Explosives Tes
Page 142 and 143:
DX Division Strategic Plan for the
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
2-116Table 2.11.1-1. Los Alamos Neu
Page 148 and 149:
Table 2.11.2-1. Los Alamos Neutron
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
2-122Table 2.11.2-1. Los Alamos Neu
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
2.12 Bioscience Facilities (TA-43,
Page 158 and 159:
Because of the building’s small s
Page 160 and 161:
is expected to continue through 200
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
2-134Table 2.12.3-1. Bioscience Fac
Page 166 and 167:
Table 2.13-1. Radiochemistry Buildi
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Table 2.13.2-1. Radiochemistry Faci
Page 172 and 173:
Table 2.13.3-1. Radiochemistry Faci
Page 174 and 175:
Table 2.14-1. Radioactive Liquid Wa
Page 176 and 177:
2.14.2 Operations at the Radioactiv
Page 178 and 179: Table 2.14.2-1. Radioactive Liquid
Page 180 and 181: Table 2.14.3-1. Radioactive Liquid
Page 182 and 183: Table 2.15-1. Solid Radioactive and
Page 184 and 185: volume is an increase from the last
Page 186 and 187: 2-156SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table 2.1
Page 190 and 191: 2-160Table 2.15.2-1. Solid Radioact
Page 192 and 193: 2.16 Non-Key FacilitiesThe balance,
Page 196 and 197: 2-166Table 2.16.1-1. Non-Key Facili
Page 198 and 199: consumption would represent approxi
Page 200 and 201: Exterior and interior views of the
Page 202 and 203: Decision Applications Division Offi
Page 204 and 205: k) Materials Science and Technology
Page 206 and 207: n) NPDES Outfall ProjectDuring 1997
Page 210 and 211: 2.17 Environmental Restoration Proj
Page 212 and 213: The sludge and water in the lagoons
Page 214 and 215: Table 2.17.3-1. Evaluated and Stabi
Page 216 and 217: 2.18 ReferencesDepartment of Energy
Page 218 and 219: Department of Energy, 1999d. “Cat
Page 220 and 221: Katzman, 2000. Personal communicati
Page 222 and 223: Los Alamos National Laboratory, 200
Page 224 and 225: Table 3.1.1-1 summarizes the radioa
Page 226 and 227: for reporting under Section 313 of
Page 230 and 231: Table 3.2-4. Discharges from NPDES
Page 232 and 233: ensures that LANL meets all require
Page 234 and 235: 3.3.3 Low-Level Radioactive WastesT
Page 236 and 237: Table 3.3.5-1. Transuranic Waste Ge
Page 238 and 239: Power Plant ComplexIn CY 2002, an e
Page 240 and 241: 3.4.3 WaterBefore September 8, 1998
Page 242 and 243: Table 3.5.2-1. Radiological Exposur
Page 244 and 245: These employees have had a positive
Page 246 and 247: 3.7.1 Land Resources—CY 1998From
Page 248 and 249: Table 3.7.5-1. Site-wide Land UseAC
Page 250 and 251: Table 3.8-1. Groundwater Characteri
Page 252 and 253: captured in the Laboratory’s annu
Page 254 and 255: 828 ft. One sample of water from th
Page 256 and 257: Table3.9-2. HistoricPeriodCulturalR
Page 258 and 259: Traditional Cultural Properties Com
Page 260 and 261: 2002 Land TransferredNine cultural
Page 262 and 263: During 2002, LANL completed three b
Page 264 and 265: Lansford, R., L. Adcock, S. Ben-Dav
Page 266 and 267: Wetland in Mortandad Canyon3-44SWEI
Page 268 and 269: years for which data were reported;
Page 270 and 271: Figure 4-4. Carbon monoxide emissio
Page 272 and 273: The SWEIS assumed that reducing out
Page 274 and 275: Sanitary WasteLANL sanitary waste g
Page 276 and 277: Low-Level WasteLANL generation of L
Page 278 and 279:
4.4 Utility ConsumptionConsumption
Page 280 and 281:
TRI(UC Workers Only)TRI(All Workers
Page 282 and 283:
Though construction and modificatio
Page 284 and 285:
LANL has also increased the invento
Page 286 and 287:
4.13 ReferencesClean Air Act. 42 US
Page 288 and 289:
The PastV-Site building related to
Page 290 and 291:
5.1.2 AssumptionsThe Laboratory use
Page 292 and 293:
Figure 5-1. Existing land use at LA
Page 294 and 295:
Table 5.2.3.1-1. Site-Wide Land Use
Page 296 and 297:
• Manhattan Monument tract, a fra
Page 298 and 299:
Table 5.2.4-2. Selected Proposed Co
Page 300 and 301:
infrastructure required to conduct
Page 302 and 303:
Page 304 and 305:
5.4 The Plan5.4.1 Planning ProcessT
Page 306 and 307:
Table 5.4.3-1. Electrical Power Con
Page 308 and 309:
easily provide forecasted water dem
Page 310 and 311:
• Fire Hazard Mitigation: Facilit
Page 312 and 313:
Table 5.5.1-1. Funding SourcesFUNDI
Page 314 and 315:
Emergency Operations Center (above
Page 316 and 317:
5.6 ReferencesAmerican Standard of
Page 318 and 319:
5-30SWEIS Yearbook—2002
Page 320 and 321:
• Construction of the DecisionApp
Page 322 and 323:
projected by the ROD. Similarly, a
Page 324 and 325:
6.2 ConclusionsIn conclusion, LANL
Page 326 and 327:
6-8SWEIS Yearbook—2002
Page 328 and 329:
A-2Table A-1. Chemistry and Metallu
Page 330 and 331:
A-4Table A-2. Bioscience Air Emissi
Page 332 and 333:
A-6SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table A-3.
Page 334 and 335:
Page 336 and 337:
A-10Table A-6. Machine Shops Air Em
Page 338 and 339:
Page 340 and 341:
Page 342 and 343:
A-16SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table A-10
Page 344 and 345:
Page 346 and 347:
A-20Table A-10. Radiochemistry Site
Page 348 and 349:
A-22Table A-11. Sigma Complex Air E
Page 350 and 351:
Page 352 and 353:
A-26Table A-13. Tritium Operations
Page 354 and 355:
Page 356 and 357:
Table B-1. Comparison of Nuclear Fa
Page 358 and 359:
B-4Table B-1. Comparison of Nuclear
Page 360 and 361:
Page 362 and 363:
B-8SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table B-1.
Page 364 and 365:
B-10SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table B-1.
Page 366 and 367:
Page 368 and 369:
Page 370 and 371:
Table C-1. Radiological Facility Li
Page 372 and 373:
Appendix D. NPDES Outfall Status Su
Page 374 and 375:
Appendix D. NPDES Outfall Status Su
Page 376 and 377:
D-6SWEIS Yearbook—2002
Page 378 and 379:
Site Boundary ChangesOn December 11
Page 380 and 381:
Figure E-2a. TA-55 old evaluationbo
Page 382 and 383:
Table E-1. Land Parcels Transferred
Page 384 and 385:
Figure E-3. Location of transfer pa
Page 386 and 387:
References and Key Information Sour
Page 388 and 389:
F-2SWEIS Yearbook—2002Table F-1.
Page 390 and 391:
Page 392 and 393:
Page 394 and 395:
Page 396 and 397:
Page 398 and 399:
Page 400 and 401:
Page 402 and 403:
Page 404 and 405:
Page 406 and 407:
F-20Table F-5. Non-RTBF Non-Facilit
Page 408 and 409:
F-22Table F-6. Non-RTBF Non-Facilit
Page 410 and 411:
Page 412:
To obtain a copy of the SWEIS Yearb
show all

131 LA UR 03 5862 - National Nuclear Security Administration ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?