131 LA UR 03 5862 - National Nuclear Security Administration ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

5.4.4 Production Readiness/Plant Capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-215.4.5 Environment, Safety, and Health/Regulatory Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-215.4.6 Security . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-225.4.7 Workforce Profile. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-225.4.8 Transportation and Parking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-235.4.9 Current Planning Initiatives. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-235.4.10 Facility Strategic Planning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-235.5 Facilities and Infrastructure Projects. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-235.5.1 Overview of Site Project Prioritization and Cost Profile. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-235.5.2 Line Item Highlighted Projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-235.5.3 FIRP Highlighted Projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-245.5.4 RTBF/Operations of Facilities Highlighted Projects. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-245.5.5 Non-RTBF/FIRP Highlighted Projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-255.5.6 Institutional General Plant Projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-265.5.7 Facilities and Infrastructure Cost Projection Spreadsheets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-275.6 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-286.0 Summary and Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-16.1 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-16.2 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-66.3 To the Future . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-6Appendix A. Chemical Usage and Emissions Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-1Appendix B. Nuclear Facilities Lists . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-1Appendix C. Radiological Facility List . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-1Appendix D. NPDES Outfall Status Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D-1Appendix E. Preliminary Assessment of Potential Impact of LANL Site Boundary Changes andLand Transfer on Accident Analyses in the SWEIS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E-1Appendix F. Future Projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-1LIST OF TABLES2.0-1. Maximum Offsite Dose Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-12.0-2. Radiological Exposure to LANL Workers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-22.0-3. Radioactive Liquid Waste Treated at LANL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-32.0-4. Low-Level Waste Generation at LANL by Facility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-42.0-5. Mixed Low-Level Waste Generation at LANL by Facility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-52.0-6. TRU Waste Generation at LANL by Facility. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-62.0-7. Mixed TRU Waste Generation at LANL by Facility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-72.0-8. Overall Solid Radioactive Waste Generation at LANL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-82.0-9. Chemical Waste Generated at LANL by Facility. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-92.0-10. LANL Nuclear Facilities–SWEIS and 2002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-112.0-11. Projected Construction and Modifications in the SWEIS ROD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-142.0-12. Projected Construction and Modifications Completed 1998–2002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-182.0-13. Capabilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-192.0-14. Summary of Inactive Capabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-242.0-15. Summary of Wastes Generated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-252.0-16. Flow from Permitted Outfalls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-262.0-17. Acreage for Key and Non-Key Facilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-30SWEIS Yearbook—2002vii
Page 1: SWEIS Yearbook - 2002LA-UR-03-5862
Page 5: CONTENTSList of Tables . . . . . .
Page 12 and 13: 3.5.2-2. Highest Individual Doses f
Page 14 and 15: xiiSWEIS Yearbook—2002
Page 16 and 17: LWCmMDAMeVMGYMLLWMSLNEPANFANISCNMED
Page 18 and 19: ReferencesDepartment of Energy, 199
Page 20 and 21: • Construction of the Emergency O
Page 22 and 23: new NPDES permit on February 1, 200
Page 24: xxiiSWEIS Yearbook—2002
Page 27 and 28: 1.0 Introduction1.1 The SWEISIn 199
Page 29 and 30: 1.3 This YearbookThe ROD selected l
Page 31 and 32: 2.0 Facilities and OperationsLANL h
Page 33 and 34: SWEIS Yearbook—2002 2-3Table 2.0-
Page 41 and 42: SWEIS Yearbook—2002 2-11Table 2.0
Page 55 and 56: Table 2.0-15. Summary of Wastes Gen
Page 57 and 58:
SWEIS Yearbook—2002 2-27Table 2.0
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Los Alamos National LaboratoryTechn
Page 63 and 64:
SANTA FENATIONALSANTA FENATIONAL FO
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
2.1.2 Operations at the Plutonium C
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Table 2.1.3-1. Plutonium Complex/Op
Page 75 and 76:
2.2 Tritium Facilities (TA-16 and T
Page 77 and 78:
Table 2.2.1-1. Tritium Facilities C
Page 79 and 80:
Table 2.2.2-1. Tritium Facilities/C
Page 81 and 82:
Table 2.2.3-1. Tritium Facilities (
Page 83 and 84:
Table 2.3-1 CMR Building with Nucle
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
2.4 Pajarito Site (TA-18)The Pajari
Page 97 and 98:
2.4.2. Operations at the Pajarito S
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
2.4.3 Operations Data for the Pajar
Page 103 and 104:
Flood retention structure during co
Page 105 and 106:
Table 2.5.1-1. Sigma Complex Constr
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
2.6 Materials Science Laboratory (T
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
2.6.3 Operations Data for the Mater
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Table 2.7.3-1. TFF (TA-35)/Operatio
Page 119 and 120:
Consistent with SWEIS ROD projectio
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
2.9 High Explosives Processing (TA-
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
SWEIS Yearbook—2002 2-101Table 2.
Page 133 and 134:
ImpactsThere were relatively few fa
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
2.10.4 Cerro Grande Fire Effects at
Page 143 and 144:
(DOE 1998d), LAN-98-109 (DOE 1998e)
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
2.11.2 Operations at the Los Alamos
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
2.11.3 Operations Data for the Los
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
In addition to the new wing, proces
Page 159 and 160:
2.12.2 Operations at the Bioscience
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
2.13 Radiochemistry Facility (TA-48
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
2.13.4 Cerro Grande Fire Effects at
Page 175 and 176:
the line to be taken out of service
Page 177 and 178:
Table 2.14.2-1. Radioactive Liquid
Page 179 and 180:
2.14.3 Operations Data for the Radi
Page 181 and 182:
2.15 Solid Radioactive and Chemical
Page 183 and 184:
To control storm water runoff from
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Table 2.15.3-1. Solid Radioactive a
Page 193 and 194:
2.16.1 Construction and Modificatio
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
a) AtlasDescription: Atlas wasconst
Page 199 and 200:
This project had its NEPA coverage
Page 201 and 202:
Group to use existing meteorologica
Page 203 and 204:
This project will construct an appr
Page 205 and 206:
The Live Fire Shoot House facility
Page 207 and 208:
In 1998, workforce size increased a
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
MDA-P after ER Project remediation
Page 213 and 214:
completed geochemistry reports on R
Page 215 and 216:
attempted to extinguish the fire; f
Page 217 and 218:
Department of Energy, 1996j. “Fin
Page 219 and 220:
Department of Energy, 2001f. “Env
Page 221 and 222:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, 200
Page 223 and 224:
3.0 Site-Wide 2002 Operations DataT
Page 225 and 226:
3.1.2 Non-Radioactive Air Emissions
Page 227 and 228:
SWEIS Yearbook—2002 3-5Table 3.2-
Page 229 and 230:
SWEIS Yearbook—2002 3-7abTable 3.
Page 231 and 232:
Stabilization measures below the de
Page 233 and 234:
3.3.2 Chemical WastesChemical waste
Page 235 and 236:
High bay in the RANT facility with
Page 237 and 238:
Table 3.4.1-1. Gas Consumption (dec
Page 239 and 240:
Table 3.4.2-2. Electric Consumption
Page 241 and 242:
3.5 Worker SafetyWorking conditions
Page 243 and 244:
Improved Personnel Dosimeter. An im
Page 245 and 246:
Table 3.6-3. UC Employee a Index fo
Page 247 and 248:
The Los Alamos Research ParkAlso du
Page 249 and 250:
3.8 GroundwaterGroundwater occurs i
Page 251 and 252:
Table 3.8-1. Groundwater Characteri
Page 253 and 254:
Cleaning the drilling residues from
Page 255 and 256:
3.9 Cultural ResourcesLANL has a la
Page 257 and 258:
The American Indian Religious Freed
Page 259 and 260:
3.9.3 Integrated Cultural Resources
Page 261 and 262:
LANL continues to operate under the
Page 263 and 264:
3.11 References20.2.73 NMAC. New Me
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
4.0 Trend AnalysisBeginning in 1999
Page 269 and 270:
14,00012,00010,0008,0006,0004,0002,
Page 271 and 272:
Figure 4-7. Emissions of sulfur oxi
Page 273 and 274:
for 1998 to 2001 (LANL 1999a, 2000,
Page 275 and 276:
Chemical WasteWaste projections for
Page 277 and 278:
TRU and Mixed TRUDespite the expect
Page 279 and 280:
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997
Page 281 and 282:
4.6 SocioeconomicsThe SWEIS ROD pro
Page 283 and 284:
4.8 GroundwaterThe SWEIS ROD projec
Page 285 and 286:
4.11 Visual ResourcesThe SWEIS iden
Page 287 and 288:
Bald eaglesSWEIS Yearbook—2002 4-
Page 289 and 290:
5.0 Ten-Year Comprehensive Site Pla
Page 291 and 292:
5.2 Site DescriptionThe site, i.e.,
Page 293 and 294:
Figure 5-2. Future land use at LANL
Page 295 and 296:
Figure 5-3. LANL parcels for convey
Page 297 and 298:
5.2.4 BuildingsAs of July 2001, the
Page 299 and 300:
A track mounted Harvester removing
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
5.3.7 Facilities and Infrastructure
Page 305 and 306:
Table 5.4.2-1. Summary of Proposed
Page 307 and 308:
Radioactive Liquid Waste. There are
Page 309 and 310:
5.4.4 Production Readiness/Plant Ca
Page 311 and 312:
in the table are not readily compar
Page 313 and 314:
Conceptual design of the proposed T
Page 315 and 316:
5.5.7 Facilities and Infrastructure
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
6.0 Summary and ConclusionThe 2002
Page 321 and 322:
Facility Operations. The SWEIS grou
Page 323 and 324:
Between 1998 and 2002, the highest
Page 325 and 326:
Pajarito CanyonSWEIS Yearbook—200
Page 327 and 328:
SWEIS Yearbook—2002 A-1Table A-1.
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331 and 332:
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
SWEIS Yearbook—2002 A-11Table A-7
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
SWEIS Yearbook—2002 B-1Table B-1.
Page 357 and 358:
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Table B-1. Comparison of Nuclear Fa
Page 367 and 368:
Table B-1. Comparison of Nuclear Fa
Page 369 and 370:
Table C-1. Radiological Facility Li
Page 371 and 372:
Appendix D. NPDES Outfall Status Su
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
Appendix E.Preliminary Assessment o
Page 379 and 380:
Figure E-1. Site boundaries for con
Page 381 and 382:
y estimating distances within which
Page 383 and 384:
Table E-2. Sixteen Radiological Acc
Page 385 and 386:
Analyses for which the city of Whit
Page 387 and 388:
Appendix F. Future ProjectsThe Appe
Page 389 and 390:
SWEIS Yearbook—2002 F-3Table F-1.
Page 391 and 392:
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
Page 397 and 398:
SWEIS Yearbook—2002 F-11Table F-3
Page 399 and 400:
Page 401 and 402:
Page 403 and 404:
Page 405 and 406:
Page 407 and 408:
Page 409 and 410:
Page 411 and 412:
SWEIS Yearbook—2002 F-25
show all

131 LA UR 03 5862 - National Nuclear Security Administration ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?