131 LA UR 03 5862 - National Nuclear Security Administration ...

Table 3.6-3. UC Employee a Index for Key FacilitiesKEY FACILITYSWEISRODCY1996CY1997CY1998REFERENCEYEAR 1999 bCY1999CY2000CY2001CY2001Plutonium Complex 1,111 463 478 526 589 589 572 635 689Tritium Facilities 123 37 33 31 28 28 24 25 20CMR 367 206 207 218 204 204 190 192 201Pajarito Site 95 57 60 65 70 70 73 73 78Sigma Complex 284 96 104 110 101 101 99 94 105MSL 82 50 55 57 57 57 59 60 61Target Fabrication 98 55 55 57 54 54 52 54 53Machine Shops 289 73 77 83 81 81 80 91 92High Explosives Testing 619 85 90 93 227 227 212 245 264High Explosives Processing 335 184 197 201 96 96 92 107 114LANSCE 846 494 523 547 560 560 550 505 496Biosciences 250 78 77 82 98 98 110 116 108Radiochemistry Laboratory 248 113 125 129 128 128 124 122 110Waste Management – Radioactive 110 47 48 55 62 62 58 47 54Liquid WasteWaste Management – Radioactive 225 40 46 60 65 65 64 60 63Solid and Chemical WasteRest of LANL 6,579 4,144 4,325 4,547 4,601 4,601 4,501 4,816 5,243Total Employees 11,661 6,222 6,500 6,861 7,021 7,021 6,860 7,242 7,751abIncludes full-time and part-time regular employees; it does not include students who may be at the Laboratory formuch of the year nor does it include special programs personnel. A similar index does not exist in the SWEIS, whichused a very time-intensive method to calculate this index.CY 1999 was selected as the reference year for this index because it represents the year the SWEIS ROD waspublished.LANL records contain the technical area and building number of each employee’s office. This informationdoes not necessarily indicate where the employee actually performs his or her work; but rather, indicateswhere this employee gets mail and officially reports to duty. However, for purposes of tracking the dynamicsof changes in employment across Key Facilities, this information provides a useful index. Table 3.6-3identifies UC employees by Key Facility based on the facility definitions contained in the SWEIS. Theemployee numbers contained in the category “Rest of LANL,” were calculated by subtracting the Key Facilitynumbers from the calendar year total.The numbers in Table 3.6-3 cannot be directly compared to numbers in the SWEIS. The employeenumbers for Key Facilities in the SWEIS represent total workforce, and include PTLA, JCNNM, and othersubcontractor personnel. The new index (shown in Table 3.6-3) is based on routinely collected informationand only represents full-time and part-time regular UC employees. It does not include employees on leave ofabsence, students (high school, cooperative, undergraduate, or graduate), or employees from special programs(i.e., limited-term or long-term visiting staff, post-doctorate, etc.). Because the two sets of numbers do notrepresent the same entity, a comparison to numbers in the SWEIS is not appropriate. This new index will beused throughout the lifetime of the Yearbook; hence, future comparisons and trending will be possible. CY1999 was selected as the reference year for this index because it represents the year the SWEIS ROD waspublished.3.7 Land ResourcesLand resources were examined in 1996–1998 during the development of the SWEIS. From then untilCY 2002, the land resources (i.e., undeveloped and developed lands) available for use at LANL remainedconstant. In CY 2002, approximately 2,209 acres of land were transferred to private ownership under PublicLaw 105-119.SWEIS Yearbook—2002 3-23