View cases - Stewart McKelvey

(iv) The Argument That Section 2(d) Is a Freedom, Not aRight............................................................................................................67(v) The Argument that Health Services PrivilegesParticular Associations................................................................................74(vi) The Argument That Health Services Gives ContractsPriority Over Statutes..................................................................................76(vii) The Argument That Health Services Removes Judicial Deference tothe Legislation.............................................................................................77(viii) The Argument of Unworkability ................................................................82(ix) The Argument on Academic Criticism.......................................................86(x) The Argument on Canadian Labour History ..............................................89(xi) The Argument on International Law...........................................................91(xii) The Argument on Charter Values ..............................................................96(xiii) Conclusion ..................................................................................................97(2) Application: Have the Respondents Established a Breach ofSection 2(d)? ..............................................................................................................98C. Section 15 of the Charter ...............................................................................................114V. Conclusion .....................................................................................................................117Reasons of Rothstein J..........................................................................................................119I. Introduction....................................................................................................................119II. When Should Precedent be Overturned? .......................................................................129III. The Explicit Break with Precedent in Health Services..................................................152A. Introduction....................................................................................................................152B. The Jurisprudential Background Prior to Health Services ...........................................157C. An Express Break With Precedent in Health Services...................................................166IV. Section 2(d) of the Charter Does Not Protect Collective Bargaining............................172A. The Collective Bargaining Right Recognized in Health Services Is InconsistentWith the Purpose of Section 2(d) ...................................................................................177(1) Section 2(d) Protects Individual Interests, Not Group Interests ..............................178(a) Individual Freedoms Versus Collective Rights..................................................1782011 SCC 20 (CanLII)