View cases - Stewart McKelvey

· .18On redirect, Mr. Fagbile testified that he understood that it was not allowed for him to work for theCompany but that his lawyer said that the new arrangement would be permitted.Mr. Fagbile testified that he understood Ms. Carter was to be his employer for the purposes ofhispaperwork but he did not think the arrangement was illegal. He was emphatic in his evidence thathe would not knowingly engage in a arrangement that might jeopardize his ability to remain inCanada and at some point bring his family to this country.2010 NSSC 252 (CanLII)Mr. Fagbile testified that after Ms. Cormier left the Company nothing changed and he continued todeal With Colin Nordqvist and no one asked him any questions.Mr. Fagbile testified that in or about October of 2005 he had a phone conversation with ColinNordqvist He had called Mr. Nordqvist to discuss the situation and at that time, he told Mr.Nordqvist that he worked for Ms. Carter. After talking to Colin Nordqvist, it was Mr. Fagbile'sevidence that he then got different cheques.Mr. Fagbile was shown exhibit PI tab 64, which was a letter written by Colin Nordqvist advisingto whom it may concern that Mr. Fagbile was employed as a full-time caregiver for a private clientin one oftheir homes. Mr. Fagbile testified that he had asked Colin Nordqvist for the letter in orderto bring his family over to Canada. Mr. Fagbile testified that Colin Nordqvist did not ask anyquestions and that the wording ofthe letter was that ofColin Nordqvist.Mr. Fagbile testified in October of 2007, he stopped working for the company because two yearswere over and he wanted to go back to school.Ms. Carteracknowledged that she was being asked to bethe employerofMr. Fagbile and understoodthat and was prepared to go along ifthat was the way to retain Mr. Fagbile to care for her father. Sherecalled no discussion about who would be paying Mr. Fagbile otherthan it was not going to be her.