View cases - Stewart McKelvey

. '...31the files relating to some ofthe staffand did not get files for others. The ones that she reviewed, shehad gotten from Colin Nordqvist.ColinNordqvist testified that there was no requirement that the Ms. Cormier had to follow the sameformat ofrecord-keeping as in his own homes.The evidence does not establishthat there was anyparticularrequirement as to the extent and formatofrecords that Ms. Cormier was to ensure were kept or that failure to do so would be considered abreach ofher employment responsibilities. Once again the evidence did establish that to a large2010 NSSC 252 (CanLII)extent Ms. Cormier was permitted to handle her side ofthe responsibilities in her own manner.AB a result, I am not satisfied that Ms. Cormier failed to keep records such that it constituted abreach of her employment responsibilities that would entitle the Company to terminate heremployment orthat would give a basis to reduce the price to bepaid for her shares pursuant to clause7.03(b)(ii).9. FAlLURE TO KEEP COMPANYRECORDS CONFIDENTIALThebasis ofthis allegation is the fact that Ms. Cormier had Company cheques and documents at theTV shop premises where they were potentially accessible by people who might be in the shop andwho would have no right to see them.Ms. Cormierhad an office at the Company location at Pepperell Street which was approximately sixbyfive which she testified was not adequate. She did work out ofthere for some years and often didwork at home onher kitchen table. As the business got busier, she needed more space. In 2002, sheasked Mr. Nordqvist if she could work using space at the unit #2 Jennifer Allan Interiors' spacelocation. They agreed and there was to be a rental paid, She had a computer and the Nordqvist's sonset it up for her at that location. Shemaintained a working area with a filing cabinet offto one side.