View cases - Stewart McKelvey

'.34Mr. Nordqvist acknowledged on cross that he had never told Ms. Cormier not to use the TV locationfor an office or for storing files.Mrs. Nordqvist testified that she had agreed with Ms. Cormier renting part ofthe space at JenniferAllan Interiors but when those premises were no longer available, she had assumed that Ms. Cormiermoved back to the Pepperell Street location. She would not have agreed to allow company recordsto be maintained in the TV shop space.Ms. Cormier testified that she did not need anyone's approval to move the records from the JenniferAllan location to the TV shop. She did move confidential records there and she acknowledged thather husband had access to the files. She did say that her filing cabinet was locked and she kept thekey. But sometimes when she was working there Company papers would be on the desk.2010 NSSC 252 (CanLII)There was no evidence that confidential Company documents would be left on the desk when Ms.Cormier was not there.Mr. Nordqvist testified that when they attended at the October 12th meeting at the TV shop, the firstthing he heard Mrs. Nordqvist say was "What is tbis?" He then described the confrontation thattook place and at that point, told bis wife that they should leave.It was the evidence of Mrs. Nordqvist that when she went into the TV shop she saw companycheques spread out on the desk where Ms. Cormier was sitting and that caused her concern.The circumstances and environment for Ms. Cormier's working space at the TV shop does not appearto have been significantly different than that in the Jennifer Allan Interiors' premises. At bothlocations the desk and file cabinet were in accessible areas.I am satisfied that both the Nordqvists were aware that Ms. Cormier was using space at the JenniferAllan Interiors' location and that Mr. Nordqvist, at least, would have been aware of the physical