210L. F. D. FARACO ET ALLIfocused on observing changes in the distribution ofmangroves as a response to relative sea-level rise(Almeida et al. 2008). Gathering results from thisand other studies, Soares (2009) has proposed aconceptual model for the study of the response ofmangroves to climate change, but it focuses,fundamentally, on biophysical aspects.In the extensive mangrove forests of thenorthern coast of Brazil, many long-term studieshave been developed, especially as part of theMADAM project (Berger et al. 1999). Some ofthese focused on biophysical dynamics, such as thetemporal analysis of mangrove distribution byCohen & Lara (2003), who concluded that mangrovestands are losing area in the seaward margin andmigrating landward, possibly as a response torelative sea level rise, but that this migration islimited by local topography. Other studies analyzedthe dependency of local populations on mangroveresources (Glaser 2003), while there were alsostudies that related the response of mangroves tosea-level rise to socioeconomic matters such as landuse and occupation (Lara et al. 2002). In otherregions of the Brazilian coast, studies have measuredextension, retraction and migration of mangroveforests, but without relating them directly to climatechange (e.g. Lacerda et al. 2007).The coast of the Brazilian southern state ofParaná is dominated by the Paranaguá EstuarineComplex (PEC), whose physical, chemical andbiological properties were described by Lana et al.(2001). It has extensive intertidal flats, whichtotalize around 295 km 2 , mostly covered bymangroves (Fig. 1). The whole region is part of aBiosphere Reserve and of the Atlantic RainforestBiome. Around 70% of the region’s surface area isstill covered by this type of forest and associatedecosystems, in stark contrast with most of theBrazilian coast, where this ecosystem has beenlargely destroyed (SOS Mata Atlântica/INPE 2009).The study case site (Fig. 1) is centeredaround the northern part of the PEC, in themunicipality of Guaraqueçaba, where there are twocoastal protected areas (PAs), managed by theBrazilian Federal Government: GuaraqueçabaEcological Station (created in 1982, it encompassesFigure 1. The Paranaguá Estuarine Complex, its extensive mangroves, numerous fishing villages and the no-takeprotected areas that dominate the northern part of the estuary. Source: Adapted from an original map designed by Prof.Mauricio A. Noernberg, CEM/UFPR.Pan-American Journal of Aquatic Sciences (2010), 5(2): 205-223
Vulnerability of Mangroves and Fisherfolk211around 11,500 hectares of mangroves around theBays of Laranjeiras and Pinheiros) and SuperagüiNational Park (created in 1989, it protects around34,000 hectares in the islands of Superagüi andPeças, which include a variety of coastalecosystems).Guaraqueçaba is a sparsely occupied areawith a population of 7,890 inhabitants distributedover 2,315 km 2 . It is one of the poorestmunicipalities in the state of Paraná, with a HumanDevelopment Index of 0.659 (IPARDES 2010).Fishing is the main activity in around 40 villageslocated on the margins of the estuary where there arean estimated 2,100 families of artisanal fisherfolk,most of them living close to mangroves and theaforementioned PAs (Martin & Zanoni 1994,IPARDES 2010). Although of little regionaleconomic importance, fishing is locally of highsocial and economic importance (Borges et al.2006).Artisanal fisheries in this area have beenchanging over time due mainly to factors such asmarket changes, demographic dynamics(immigration) and technical innovation, which ledpart of the local fisheries to more intensified andmarket-oriented practices, while some of the otherpractices have disappeared (Andriguetto-Filho 2003,Andriguetto-Filho et al. 2009).Environmental problems in the coasts ofBrazil and Paraná affect fisherfolk in diverse ways,causing a series of conflicts, such as thedisplacement of these populations to inappropriateareas, disputes over fishing grounds among artisanaland industrial fisheries and aquaculture,contamination and depletion of fishing stocks,among others. Cleavages are also observed amongartisanal fisherfolk, between those that aretraditionally linked to fishing and the opportunists,and between those that use predatory techniques andthose that avoid them (Andriguetto-Filho 1999).These problems threaten the survival and socioeconomicreproduction of these populations.Besides environmental degradation and thedisputes with industrial fisheries, there are evidencesof conflicts between environmental regulations andthe economic activities of local populations,especially those engaged in small-scale fishing andagriculture. Many studies point to environmentalconflicts associated with the creation of PAs in thecoast of Paraná, especially in the municipality ofGuaraqueçaba (Andriguetto-Filho 1993, Martin &Zanoni 1994, Zanoni & Miguel 1995, Pedroso Jr.2002, Cunha et al. 2004, Miranda 2004, Teixeira2004).Brazilian mangroves are also included in notakePAs, besides being protected by many differentlaws (Martin & Lana 1994). This may contribute tothe resilience of natural systems, but can also affectthe vulnerability of human populations. Large tractsof Atlantic Rainforest and mangroves in Paranácompose an area of high priority for biodiversityconservation, being classified as of extremely highbiological importance by the Brazilian Ministry ofEnvironment (MMA 2007). A great variety ofecosystems and species of interest for conservationis reflected in the existence of many PAs in thisregion. These areas have been created here since the1980s and include no-take reserves as well as“sustainable use” ones. They cover a large portion ofthe region: around 76% of the northern coast ofParaná is included inside PAs, of which 13%(59,440 hectares) in no-take reserves such asNational Parks and Ecological Stations. There arealso specific rules to protect the Atlantic Rainforest,which also limit the possibilities for occupation ofthe land and usage of natural resources. This standsin stark contrast with the process of rapid destructionof natural ecosystems that characterized the firstcenturies of human occupation of the Brazilian coast(SOS Mata Atlântica/INPE 2009).In no-take PAs, and especially on those thatinclude mangroves, there is a prevalence of strictconservation rules, which aim at completely banningthe direct use of natural resources. Mangroves werethe first ecosystem in the region to be included in ano-take PA (the above mentioned GuaraqueçabaEcological Station is composed mainly ofmangroves). For this ecosystem, strict no-take rulesapplied equally to all mangroves represent asimplistic view of the ecosystems structural andfunctional characteristics, because they are based onthe misconception that all mangrove stands areequally productive, that resources are equallydistributed and even that human groups access andexplore all areas in the same way and with the sameintensity. This last assumption also ignoresterritoriality relations between human groups andeven the community conservation mechanisms thatmay be in use by them. All of this makes these rulesnot only inadequate but also inefficient, and evenunfair, paradoxically resulting in open-accesssituations and in the environmental degradation ofthese ecosystems. Extensive discussions on thenovel conflicts created by environmental legislation,mainly in the northern sector of the ParanaguáEstuarine Complex, were provided by Martin &Zanoni (1994), Lana (2003) and Raynaut et al.(2007).Pan-American Journal of Aquatic Sciences (2010), 5(2): 205-223