Beer : Health and Nutrition
Beer : Health and Nutrition
Beer : Health and Nutrition
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The Impact of Alcohol on <strong>Health</strong> 133<br />
would extend to an expectation that moderate consumption of alcohol in vertex-pattern<br />
bald men would have a more favourable effect than in hirsute or front-balding men,<br />
though I have not come across such a study.<br />
Excessive consumption of alcohol is detrimental to the heart muscle, leading to a<br />
disease called cardiomyopathy (McDonald et al. 1971; Schoppet & Maisch 2001). It<br />
tends to be associated with excessive alcohol consumption over a prolonged period:<br />
one estimate is 120 g alcohol (roughly 7 pints of beer) every day for 20 years (Urbano-<br />
Marquez et al. 1989). Other muscles in the body are probably affected also.<br />
In some circumstances it may not have been the alcohol alone that has led to the disease.<br />
For example, arsenic contamination led to major heart problems in Manchester in<br />
1900 (Reynolds 1901), while cardiomyopathy was one consequence of the ill-reasoned<br />
use of cobalt as a foam stabiliser in Quebec <strong>and</strong> a few other places in the mid-1960s<br />
(Morin & Daniel 1967).<br />
Excessive drinking has been proposed (Alvarez et al. 1999) as one of the several<br />
causes of atrial brillation – an irregular heartbeat – with attendant breathlessness <strong>and</strong><br />
perhaps palpitations <strong>and</strong> angina. Koskinen (1991), by contrast, did not nd a causal<br />
link between misuse of alcohol <strong>and</strong> the occurrence of this disease. This type of con ict<br />
in the literature is not uncommon, because many studies involved drawing correlations<br />
between disease (or lack of disease) <strong>and</strong> records (often self-reported by patients) of<br />
dietary information, including the intake of beer. Frequently other correlations are at play<br />
that may confound the observations. A good example might be that people who smoke<br />
are often heavy drinkers. A direct correlation of a disease with the smoking that might<br />
be genuine would also correlate with alcohol intake, but this would not necessarily be<br />
a causal link. Of course the converse might apply equally. With a weather eye for these<br />
dif culties, let us continue.<br />
Studies have indicated that hypertension (increased blood pressure) is twice as<br />
common in heavy drinkers as opposed to light drinkers, seemingly unconnected with<br />
any weight increase (Kannel & Ellison 1996). <strong>Beer</strong> use is said to be associated with<br />
higher blood pressure (Nevill et al. 1997). Potter <strong>and</strong> Beevers (1984) found that 4 pints<br />
daily over a period of 3–4 days had a demonstrable effect on this measurement. Keil<br />
et al. (1993) describe a causal link between ‘chronic’ intake (> 30–60 g alcohol per<br />
day, perhaps less for women) <strong>and</strong> the elevation of blood pressure in men <strong>and</strong> women.<br />
As a rule of thumb, the authors claim that at levels greater than 30 g alcohol per day,<br />
each increase of 10 g per day alcohol increases systolic blood pressure by an average<br />
of 1–2 mmHg <strong>and</strong> diastolic blood pressure by 1 mmHg. Only obesity is a greater risk<br />
factor. The precise way in which alcohol exerts its effect is unknown, but there appear<br />
to be neural, humoral <strong>and</strong> direct vascular elements.<br />
Williams (1997) has shown that despite the bene cial effect of alcohol (<strong>and</strong> exercise)<br />
on levels of HDL-cholesterol in the body, the intake of alcohol continued to increase