Beer : Health and Nutrition
Beer : Health and Nutrition
Beer : Health and Nutrition
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
136 Chapter Six<br />
Through adaptation, heavy drinkers probably metabolise alcohol more rapidly than<br />
do non-drinkers, provided that their digestive system has not been damaged. Fors<strong>and</strong>er<br />
<strong>and</strong> Sinclair (1992) produced evidence based on studies with rats that rates of alcohol<br />
elimination <strong>and</strong> alcohol consumption are partially determined by genetics. Rats displaying<br />
higher rates of alcohol elimination or levels of ADH had higher voluntary intakes<br />
of alcohol than rats with lower elimination rates. Although alcohol elimination itself<br />
probably does not exert direct control over drinking, some factor related to the rate<br />
of alcohol elimination appears to be among the mechanisms in uencing the level of<br />
alcohol consumption.<br />
Heavy drinkers commonly suffer from chronic gastritis, an in ammation of the stomach<br />
lining (Figlie et al. 2002). It is a particular problem for those who also smoke. Alcohol<br />
to excess also affects the blood supply to <strong>and</strong> motility of the small intestine (Chiba &<br />
Phillips 2000). There is good evidence for a link between the organism Helicobacter<br />
pylori <strong>and</strong> ulceration of the stomach <strong>and</strong> duodenum, as well as stomach cancer. It has<br />
been reported that alcohol protects against infection by H. pylori (Brenner et al. 1997,<br />
1999, 2001; Ogihara et al. 2000), in fact countering the effect of coffee. However, it<br />
is also claimed that alcohol lessens the incidence of this organism in older people, but<br />
appears to promote the growth of the organism in younger folk. Ohsugi et al. (1997)<br />
showed that the hop β-acid lupulone could inhibit growth of H. pylori, so conceivably<br />
it is not alcohol alone that is responsible for the effect.<br />
There appears to be an increased risk of pancreatitis in heavy drinkers (Dreiling et<br />
al. 1952; Haber et al. 1995; Sakorafas & Tsiotou 2000), with about 1 in 20 people suffering.<br />
As this tissue is responsible for making digestive enzymes <strong>and</strong> also insulin, there<br />
are attendant problems with digestion <strong>and</strong> diabetes. The reduced digestive ef ciency<br />
leads to an increased level of triglycerides <strong>and</strong> therefore atheroma <strong>and</strong> increased risk of<br />
cardiovascular disease (compare this statement with the observed upturn in the U-shaped<br />
curve for high alcohol intake; see earlier). Schmidt (1991) suggests that the consumption<br />
of distilled spirits, but not wine or beer, is a risk factor for pancreatitis.<br />
Gall bladder activities are improved by alcohol. Its consumption speeds up the emptying<br />
of the gall bladder after a meal <strong>and</strong> increases the rate of lling, too – so people with<br />
reasonable alcohol intake develop fewer gallstones. Leitzmann et al. (1999) showed<br />
that, after adjusting for other risk factors, an increased amount of alcohol consumed<br />
correlated with a decreased risk of symptomatic gallstone disease. It seemed that frequency<br />
of intake was an important factor, with intake 5–7 days per week leading to a<br />
decreased risk, as compared with non-drinkers. In contrast, infrequent alcohol intake<br />
(1–2 days per week) led to no change of risk. The nature of the alcoholic beverage did<br />
not appear to be signi cant.<br />
The Oxford Textbook of Medicine (Weatherall et al. 1996) suggests that consumption<br />
rates of 80 g alcohol daily by a man <strong>and</strong> 50 g by a woman gives a 15% chance of liver<br />
damage. These levels equate to more than 5 pints <strong>and</strong> 3 pints of average-strength beer,