28.11.2012 Views

Beer : Health and Nutrition

Beer : Health and Nutrition

Beer : Health and Nutrition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

150 Chapter Six<br />

We might compare these observations with those of Gasbarrini et al. (1998) that a<br />

beer-containing diet (as opposed to an ethanol-containing one) reduced the prevalence<br />

of oxidative markers in rats.<br />

One of the rst reports of a link between alcohol <strong>and</strong> cancer was the observation in<br />

France nearly a century ago that 80% of the cancers of the oesophagus <strong>and</strong> stomach<br />

occurred in absinthe-drinking alcoholics (Lamy 1910). There is, however, no evidence<br />

that ethanol itself is carcinogenic, although its oxidation product acetaldehyde may be<br />

(Prival 2003).<br />

<strong>Beer</strong>, being produced from cereals, is at risk from contamination with ochratoxins,<br />

which are teratogenic, immunotoxic, genotoxic, mutagenic <strong>and</strong> carcinogenic (Creppy<br />

1999). However, the vast majority of beers, which are produced from sound, uncontaminated<br />

grain, are devoid of signi cant levels of ochratoxin (Long 1999; <strong>and</strong> see<br />

Chapter 5).<br />

Most widely publicised of the potential carcinogens in beer are the nitrosamines, but a<br />

concerted effort by maltsters <strong>and</strong> brewers ever since the problem was rst mooted in 1978<br />

(Spiegelhalder et al. 1979) means that levels of nitrosamines these days are extremely<br />

low, at one- fteenth the level of 20 years ago (Sen et al. 1996). When considering<br />

nitrates <strong>and</strong> nitrites as potential carcinogens, the levels originating from beer are vastly<br />

lower than those in vegetables <strong>and</strong> cured meat products (Dich et al. 1996). For moderate<br />

beer drinkers the levels of nitrosamines are unlikely to constitute a hazard (Tricker &<br />

Preussmann 1991). A more recently highlighted concern has been the possible presence<br />

of chloropropanols in some of the more intensely heated grist materials used for brewing,<br />

yet it seems that these substances do not carry forward into beer (Long 1999).<br />

Acrylamide, another material recently highlighted as a concern for many products,<br />

perhaps least of all beer (http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/sc/scf/out131_en.pdf)<br />

has been shown not to correlate with cancer of the large bowel, kidney or bladder at<br />

current rates of consumption (Mucci et al. 2003).<br />

It is claimed that heavy drinkers have a greatly increased risk of oropharyngeal <strong>and</strong><br />

lower oesophageal cancer compared to light drinkers or abstainers (Day et al. 1993;<br />

Kabat et al. 1993; Kune et al. 1993). Ishii et al. (2001) observe that the risks are greater<br />

with ‘stronger’ alcoholic beverages <strong>and</strong> heavy smoking, but also for those people with<br />

an atypical alcohol dehydrogenase phenotype (ADH2). Seemingly this enzyme protects<br />

by preventing heavy drinking.<br />

Remarkably, it has been concluded that non-drinkers are at increased risk of lung<br />

cancer (Woodson et al. 1999). However, although the authors claim that the study is<br />

inconclusive, B<strong>and</strong>era et al. (2001) suggest that beer increases the risk of lung cancer.<br />

In reviewing the literature they observe that of 11 prior studies on beer in relation to<br />

lung cancer, ve suggested a positive association, two indicated possibly weak support,<br />

but four found no association.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!