Beer : Health and Nutrition
Beer : Health and Nutrition
Beer : Health and Nutrition
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
150 Chapter Six<br />
We might compare these observations with those of Gasbarrini et al. (1998) that a<br />
beer-containing diet (as opposed to an ethanol-containing one) reduced the prevalence<br />
of oxidative markers in rats.<br />
One of the rst reports of a link between alcohol <strong>and</strong> cancer was the observation in<br />
France nearly a century ago that 80% of the cancers of the oesophagus <strong>and</strong> stomach<br />
occurred in absinthe-drinking alcoholics (Lamy 1910). There is, however, no evidence<br />
that ethanol itself is carcinogenic, although its oxidation product acetaldehyde may be<br />
(Prival 2003).<br />
<strong>Beer</strong>, being produced from cereals, is at risk from contamination with ochratoxins,<br />
which are teratogenic, immunotoxic, genotoxic, mutagenic <strong>and</strong> carcinogenic (Creppy<br />
1999). However, the vast majority of beers, which are produced from sound, uncontaminated<br />
grain, are devoid of signi cant levels of ochratoxin (Long 1999; <strong>and</strong> see<br />
Chapter 5).<br />
Most widely publicised of the potential carcinogens in beer are the nitrosamines, but a<br />
concerted effort by maltsters <strong>and</strong> brewers ever since the problem was rst mooted in 1978<br />
(Spiegelhalder et al. 1979) means that levels of nitrosamines these days are extremely<br />
low, at one- fteenth the level of 20 years ago (Sen et al. 1996). When considering<br />
nitrates <strong>and</strong> nitrites as potential carcinogens, the levels originating from beer are vastly<br />
lower than those in vegetables <strong>and</strong> cured meat products (Dich et al. 1996). For moderate<br />
beer drinkers the levels of nitrosamines are unlikely to constitute a hazard (Tricker &<br />
Preussmann 1991). A more recently highlighted concern has been the possible presence<br />
of chloropropanols in some of the more intensely heated grist materials used for brewing,<br />
yet it seems that these substances do not carry forward into beer (Long 1999).<br />
Acrylamide, another material recently highlighted as a concern for many products,<br />
perhaps least of all beer (http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/sc/scf/out131_en.pdf)<br />
has been shown not to correlate with cancer of the large bowel, kidney or bladder at<br />
current rates of consumption (Mucci et al. 2003).<br />
It is claimed that heavy drinkers have a greatly increased risk of oropharyngeal <strong>and</strong><br />
lower oesophageal cancer compared to light drinkers or abstainers (Day et al. 1993;<br />
Kabat et al. 1993; Kune et al. 1993). Ishii et al. (2001) observe that the risks are greater<br />
with ‘stronger’ alcoholic beverages <strong>and</strong> heavy smoking, but also for those people with<br />
an atypical alcohol dehydrogenase phenotype (ADH2). Seemingly this enzyme protects<br />
by preventing heavy drinking.<br />
Remarkably, it has been concluded that non-drinkers are at increased risk of lung<br />
cancer (Woodson et al. 1999). However, although the authors claim that the study is<br />
inconclusive, B<strong>and</strong>era et al. (2001) suggest that beer increases the risk of lung cancer.<br />
In reviewing the literature they observe that of 11 prior studies on beer in relation to<br />
lung cancer, ve suggested a positive association, two indicated possibly weak support,<br />
but four found no association.