28.11.2012 Views

Beer : Health and Nutrition

Beer : Health and Nutrition

Beer : Health and Nutrition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

28 Chapter One<br />

of tolerance, acceptance <strong>and</strong> savouring. Impacting factors are peer impressions <strong>and</strong><br />

adult mimicry. At rst they st<strong>and</strong> in bars, saying ‘boy, this stuff sure is great’, when in<br />

fact they nd the avour challenging, to say the least. The same pressures lead to the<br />

impression that smoking is mature <strong>and</strong> socially sophisticated.<br />

There are two possible reactions to such observations. Some would argue that the<br />

response should be to scare young people from the ‘evils’ <strong>and</strong> educate them so that this<br />

mimicry of adults is seen as futile <strong>and</strong> ill advised. The converse attitude, particularly<br />

when armed dispassionately with the facts in support of a very real positive impact of<br />

moderate alcohol consumption, is to educate with a more balanced approach. Sure, excessive<br />

consumption of alcohol is stupid, detrimental to health <strong>and</strong> antisocial. Restrained<br />

consumption, though, can be a boon. Schools in America teach ‘Driver’s Ed’ to develop<br />

good road skills in young people. The person who advocated the banning of the automobile<br />

in response to the numerous instances of speeding, accidents (far from all traceable<br />

to drunkenness) <strong>and</strong> atmospheric pollution caused by such machinery would be viewed<br />

as eccentric at the very least.<br />

Sutherl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Willner (1998) investigated problems of alcohol, cigarette <strong>and</strong> illicit<br />

drug use in English adolescents. They found that instances of drug use <strong>and</strong> smoking<br />

were lowest in those young people who drank beer or wine, was intermediate in those<br />

consuming ‘alcopops’ (nowadays the terms ‘malternative’ is in vogue for this type of<br />

product) <strong>and</strong> highest in those who drank spirits.<br />

Schweitz (2001) made some very perceptive observations regarding beer drinking in<br />

Sweden. He says that many Swedes have been inculcated with a feeling that even very<br />

modest consumption of beverages of relatively low alcohol content (e.g. most beers) is<br />

morally wrong. He claims that the unjusti ed reaction of shame <strong>and</strong> guilt in turn leads<br />

to feelings of ‘let’s do something to feel guilty about’, with attendant episodes of binge<br />

drinking. Such drinking patterns of over-indulgence separated by lengthy periods of<br />

abstinence are more prevalent in Sweden than in other countries. Schweitz also says<br />

that the proportionately higher taxation rate (on an alcohol basis) on beer as opposed<br />

to stronger products (wine, spirits) encourages people to consume the higher-alcohol<br />

products.<br />

There is a strong appreciation that the most acute health <strong>and</strong> social consequences<br />

are most frequently associated with those who indulge in light drinking but then binge<br />

(Poikolainen 1995; Stockwell et al. 1996; Grant & Litvak 1998).<br />

Underst<strong>and</strong>ably there is great concern from the medical profession in the face of<br />

the burgeoning evidence for the bene cial impact on the body of moderate alcohol<br />

consumption (which we will address in Chapter 6). To actually recommend that people<br />

drink is considered beyond the ethical pale. As W. Castelli, a principal in the famed<br />

Framingham Heart Study (see Chapter 6), wrote in 1979, ‘With 17 million alcoholics<br />

in this country we perhaps have a message for which this country is not yet ready.’ And

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!