12.07.2015 Views

Tracking Financial Performance Standards of ... - Sa-Dhan

Tracking Financial Performance Standards of ... - Sa-Dhan

Tracking Financial Performance Standards of ... - Sa-Dhan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Performance</strong> Indicators <strong>of</strong> Micr<strong>of</strong>inance Institutions : Some Popular Tools used WorldwideAnnex1PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR MICROFINANCEINSTITUTIONS : SOME POPULAR TOOLS USEDWORLDWIDESl.No.Name <strong>of</strong>Tool/InstitutionBroad performance areaIndicators to measure performance1. CAMEL, ACCIONCAMEL analyses thefive traditionalaspects considered tobe most important inthe operation <strong>of</strong> afinancialintermediary.These five areasreflect the financialcondition and generaloperational strength<strong>of</strong> the MFI and arebriefly summarised inthe next column.1. C-Capital adequacy. The capital position <strong>of</strong> theinstitution and its capacity to support growth <strong>of</strong>the loan portfolio as well as a potentialdeterioration in assets are assessed. The CAMELanalysis looks at the institution’s ability to raiseadditional equity in the case <strong>of</strong> losses and itsability and policies to establish reserves againstthe inherent risk in its operations.2. A-Asset quality. The overall quality <strong>of</strong> the loanportfolio and other assets, includinginfrastructure (for example, <strong>of</strong>ficer location andenvironment), is examined. This requiresanalysing the level <strong>of</strong> portfolio at risk and write<strong>of</strong>fs,as well as the appropriateness <strong>of</strong> the portfolioclassification system, collection procedures, andwrite-<strong>of</strong>f policies.Quantitative• Leverage• Reserve adequacyQualitative• Ability to raise equityQuantitative• Portfolio at Risk(> 30 days past due)• Write-<strong>of</strong>fsQualitative• Portfolio classification system• Productivity <strong>of</strong> long-term assets• Infrastructure3. M-Management. Human resource policy, thegeneral management <strong>of</strong> the institution,management information systems, internalcontrol and auditing, and strategic planning andbudgeting are examined as distinct areas thatreflects the overall quality <strong>of</strong> management.Qualitative• Governance/Management• Human resources• Processes, controls, and audit• Information technology system• Strategic planning and budgeting4. E-Earning. The key components <strong>of</strong> revenues andexpense are analysed, including the level <strong>of</strong>operational efficiency and the institution’sinterest rate policy as well as the overall resultsas measured by return on equity and return onassets.Quantitative• Adjusted return on equity• Operational efficiency• Adjusted return on assetsQualitative• Interest rate Policy4. L-Liquidity. This component <strong>of</strong> the analysislooks at the institution’s ability to projectfunding needs in general and credit demand inparticular. The liability structure <strong>of</strong> theinstitution, as well as the productivity <strong>of</strong> itscurrent assets, is also an important aspect <strong>of</strong>the overall assessment <strong>of</strong> an institution’sliquidity management.Quantitative• Productivity <strong>of</strong> other current assetsQualitative• Liability Structure• Availability <strong>of</strong> Funds to MeetCredit Demand• Cash Flow ProjectionsSource: <strong>Sa</strong>ltzman, Rock and <strong>Sa</strong>linger 1998103

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!