12.07.2015 Views

Morphology and plasmonic properties of self-organized arrays of ...

Morphology and plasmonic properties of self-organized arrays of ...

Morphology and plasmonic properties of self-organized arrays of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

101increased. Before the deposition (red curves in fig. 6.3), the longitudinal LSP mode isfound at λ L = 620 nm, with a width <strong>of</strong> Γ L = 170 nm; the transverse mode is insteadlocated at λ T = 570 nm <strong>and</strong> has a width <strong>of</strong> Γ T = 125 nm. Following the deposition (blackcurves in fig. 6.3), both modes redshift by few tens <strong>of</strong> nm, the L mode at λ ∗ L = 645 nm<strong>and</strong> the T mode at λ ∗ T = 585 nm, while the corresponding widths become Γ∗ L = 215 nm<strong>and</strong> Γ ∗ T = 145 nm, respectively.This trend is in accordance with the qualitative considerations in §1.3.3, where wediscussed the dependence <strong>of</strong> the dielectric environment on the LSP resonances. In particular,the simultaneous redshift <strong>of</strong> the resonances can be explained in terms <strong>of</strong> the Fröhlichcondition Re [ ε L,Tm (λ L,T ) ] = −2ε h (see eq. (1.45)), where ε m , ε L,Th<strong>and</strong> λ L,T are thedielectric constant <strong>of</strong> the individual Au NPs <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the host <strong>and</strong> the position <strong>of</strong> the resonances,respectively. ε m is shown in fig. 5.6(b), <strong>and</strong> its real part has a negative slopefor increasing wavelengths; in fig. 6.4 we report instead the dielectric constant <strong>of</strong> bulkmagnetite, extracted from ref. [220]. In analogy with the model <strong>of</strong> the previous chapter,in first approximation the dielectric constant ε h can be expressed as a linear combination<strong>of</strong> the dielectric constants <strong>of</strong> the materials surrounding the Au NPs; therefore, followingthe deposition <strong>of</strong> the Fe 3 O 4 /OA NPs, ε h is expected to increase, because the real part<strong>of</strong> the dielectric constant <strong>of</strong> magnetite reads about ε 1 = 5 in correspondence <strong>of</strong> the goldnanoparticles LSP resonances. Then, according to the Fröhlich condition, if ε h increases<strong>and</strong> ε m has a negative slope as a function <strong>of</strong> the wavelength, the LSP resonances <strong>of</strong> thegold NPs must red shift when embedded in the Fe 3 O 4 /OA layer.64.053.5Re []43.0Im []32.522.040060080010001200 [nm]Figure 6.4: Real (red line) <strong>and</strong> imaginary (black line) parts <strong>of</strong> the dielectric constant <strong>of</strong>bulk magnetite in the visible <strong>and</strong> near-IR range, from ref. [220].In order to quantitatively evaluate the effects <strong>of</strong> the Fe 3 O 4 /OA NPs on the <strong>plasmonic</strong>response <strong>of</strong> the Au NPs array, we can apply the theoretical framework developed in theprevious chapter to the current system. In fig. 6.5(a) we report the computed R S spectrafor the “bare” Au/LiF nanostructures, compared to the corresponding experimentalvalues, for the L <strong>and</strong> T LSP modes, at an angle <strong>of</strong> incidence <strong>of</strong> θ = 50 ◦ . In analogywith before, the morphological parameters employed for the calculations were obtainedfrom the analysis <strong>of</strong> the AFM data: for the NPs spacings across <strong>and</strong> along the ripples weused d x = d y = 33 nm, while the values <strong>of</strong> the ellipsoids semiaxes were a x = 11.2 nm,a y = 14.0 nm <strong>and</strong> a z = 6.4 nm.The corresponding spectra in presence <strong>of</strong> the Fe 3 O 4 /OA NPs were computed keepingthe same input parameters, except two specific modifications. Considering a single

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!