12 CHAPTER 1. THEORYfrom which, separating the real <strong>and</strong> imaginary part <strong>of</strong> the complex wave number, weobtain(E(r,t) = E exp − ωK )c ˆk·r exp[i(ωt−k·r)](= E exp − α 2 ˆk·r)exp[i(ωt−k·r)](1.9)The absorption coefficientα = 2Kωc= 4πKλ(1.10)is defined as the fraction <strong>of</strong> power absorbed per unit length, as expressed by the Beer lawI(z +d) = I(z) e −αd , where I(z) <strong>and</strong> I(z +d) are the intensities (optical power per unitarea) at positions z <strong>and</strong> z + d. Then, we can see that the refractive index N <strong>and</strong> theextinction coefficient K are responsible, respectively, for the propagation <strong>of</strong> light <strong>and</strong> forthe exponential decrease <strong>of</strong> the EM fields amplitudes.For isotropic non-magnetic media, the complex refractive index <strong>and</strong> the dielectricconstant are related by the simple expressionor equivalently for the real <strong>and</strong> imaginary partsε = ñ 2 (1.11)ε 1 = N 2 −K 2ε 2 = 2NK(1.12a)(1.12b)<strong>and</strong>N =√ √ε21 +ε 2 2 +ε 12(1.12c)K =√ √ε21 +ε 2 2 −ε 12(1.12d)1.1.1 Dipole oscillator modelAs seen before, the dielectric constant can be put in relation with the microscopic characteristics<strong>of</strong> the dense medium. In this section, we will therefore shortly discuss the mainfeatures <strong>of</strong> the microscopic mechanisms that govern the light-matter interactions. In general,the functional form <strong>of</strong> ε is quite complex, as several kinds <strong>of</strong> polarizations can beinduced. When an analytical representation is required, the usual approach is thereforeto decompose <strong>and</strong> analyse the individual contributions, <strong>and</strong> then merge the results. Inthis respect, several models have been proposed, suitable to describe the specific <strong>properties</strong><strong>of</strong> the samples. The dipole oscillator or Lorentz model follows from the classicaltheory <strong>of</strong> absorption <strong>and</strong> despite its simplicity it <strong>of</strong>fers a good picture <strong>of</strong> the polarizationmechanisms.
1.1. LIGHT AND MATTER 13E, pF Ea.F ,elF Γ 13020100-100.30ε 1ε 2ε 1=12.2ω Γ 0- /2Γω 0ω0+ Γ/2frequency [eV]ε 1=1000.50b. c.5040302010 2N76543210.30NKω 0frequency [eV]5432100.50KFigure 1.3: Top panel: physical representation <strong>of</strong> the Lorentz oscillator; when displacedby the application <strong>of</strong> an external electric field E, the positive <strong>and</strong> negative atomic chargesattract each other by an elastic restoring force F el , <strong>and</strong> their motion is damped by aviscous force F Γ . Bottom panels: frequency dependence <strong>of</strong> the real <strong>and</strong> imaginary parts<strong>of</strong> the complex dielectric function (left panel) <strong>and</strong> refractive index (right panel), calculatedaccording to the Lorentz model (1.13) (χ = 9, A = 0.36, ω 0 = 0.4 eV, Γ = 20 meV) atfrequencies close to resonance.According to this model, when an atom is irradiated by an external electric fieldit behaves like a damped harmonic oscillator (fig. 1.3(a)): the exciting field displacesthe positive nucleus from the negative electronic cloud, inducing an electric dipole; thecharges, being separated, attract each other with a restoring force proportional to thedisplacement, realizing an oscillator; during the motion <strong>of</strong> the electrical charges under theinfluence <strong>of</strong> the fields, several energy losses can occur, like collisions with other atoms orspontaneous emission, effectively providing a damping mechanism for the oscillator.The complex dielectric constant <strong>of</strong> a single Lorentz oscillator can be written asε L (ω) = 1+χ+Aω 2 0 −ω2 +iΓω(1.13)where ω is the frequency <strong>of</strong> the exciting field, ω 0 the resonance frequency, Γ the dampingrate, A a constant related to the electrons mass <strong>and</strong> density <strong>and</strong> χ is the susceptibilityaccounting for all the other contributions to the polarizability. The frequency dependence<strong>of</strong> the real <strong>and</strong> the imaginary parts <strong>of</strong> ε L is plotted in fig. 1.3(b). ε L 2 is zero everywhereexcept near the resonance where a characteristic (lorentzian) peak is present, with fullwidth at half maximum (FWHM) equal to Γ. ε L 1, instead, has a more complex trend; atlow frequencies it has a constant value <strong>of</strong> 1+χ+A/ω 2 0, then, approaching the resonance,it gradually rises up to a maximum at ω 0 −Γ/2, it falls sharply to a minimum at ω 0 +Γ/2,<strong>and</strong> it rises again, towards the high frequencies limit <strong>of</strong> 1+χ.Using the real <strong>and</strong> imaginary parts <strong>of</strong> (1.13), we can apply (1.12) to calculate the correspondingrefractive index <strong>and</strong> extinction coefficient, as shown in fig. 1.3(c). Comparingfig. 1.3(b) <strong>and</strong> fig. 1.3(c), we see that N is very similar to ε L 1 while K is peaked around