12.07.2015 Views

Morphology and plasmonic properties of self-organized arrays of ...

Morphology and plasmonic properties of self-organized arrays of ...

Morphology and plasmonic properties of self-organized arrays of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

86 CHAPTER 5. MODELLING AND ANALYSIS OF THE OPT. PROP.we set the thickness <strong>of</strong> the effective layer d eff to half the ripples periodicity Λ (d eff = Λ/2),<strong>and</strong> we assume the particles centered at half height inside the layer (d z = d eff /2 = Λ/4).The in-plane periodicities <strong>of</strong> the inclusions, d x <strong>and</strong> d y (d y = Λ), are chosen accordingto the mean values extracted from the AFM data, neglecting in first approximation thecontributions <strong>of</strong> their finite spread on the LSP response. In fact, while there are ampledemonstrations that the LSP resonances in isolated NPs pairs are a strong function <strong>of</strong>their mutual separation [69, 71, 73, 74] (see also §1.3.4), the 2D rectangular symmetry<strong>of</strong> our <strong>arrays</strong> has the positive effect <strong>of</strong> limiting the impact <strong>of</strong> the interparticle dipolarcoupling on the LSPs, via a partial cancellation <strong>of</strong> the dipole interactions between theNPs (fig. 5.16). This effect, discussed more in detail in §5.2.2, is qualitatively supportedby the observation <strong>of</strong> remarkably narrow LSP peaks, compared to what would be expectedconsidering the spread in the NP-NP distance [69, 71, 73, 74]. Moreover, such cancellationeffects also makes the LSP response less sensitive to the morphological disorder.Considering instead the geometry <strong>of</strong> the nanoparticles, the LSP can be critically affectedby the dispersion <strong>of</strong> sizes <strong>and</strong> shapes. In our samples, the NP dimensions are suchthat multipolar LSP are fully negligible, therefore the presence <strong>of</strong> a distribution <strong>of</strong> NPsizes affects the LSP resonances mainly via the appearance <strong>of</strong> intrinsic finite-size correctionsto the bulk Au dielectric constant [151, 154, 214] (cfr. §1.3, §1.3.2). These effectshave been included in the model, as already explained before (see fig. 5.6(b)), although,for the typical mean size <strong>and</strong> deviation under consideration here, they yield a relativelyminor impact on the LSP [65]. NP shape effects, namely the distribution <strong>of</strong> in-planeaspect ratios, provide instead a significant LSP broadening <strong>and</strong> weakening mechanisms,through the onset <strong>of</strong> a corresponding distribution <strong>of</strong> depolarization factors (eq. (5.1)).As described in §3.2, we can independently control the NPs aspect ratio <strong>and</strong> spacing byappropriately tuning, during the samples fabrication, the substrate temperature <strong>and</strong> thethickness <strong>of</strong> the deposited gold layer. We exploit this possibility by realizing two differentclasses <strong>of</strong> samples, respectively featuring in-plane isotropic Au NPs arranged on a rectangularlattice <strong>and</strong> in-plane elongated Au NPs arranged on a square grid. In both cases, anoptical anisotropy arises in the system, respectively originating from the anisotropic EMcoupling in the array <strong>and</strong> from the single-NP intrinsic anisotropic polarizability, which inturn determines anisotropic EM interactions between the NPs.In the next paragraphs we will review the morphological <strong>and</strong> optical characterizationsfor such classes <strong>of</strong> samples, <strong>and</strong> then exploit the capabilities <strong>of</strong> our model to assess thedifferent contributions <strong>of</strong> the intrinsic <strong>and</strong> collective effects on the LSP.Morphological characterizationThe quantitative morphological parameters corresponding to the first sample are summarizedin fig. 5.9 (cfr. the AFM measurement <strong>of</strong> fig. 3.8(c)). In panel (a) we report arepresentative AFM image <strong>of</strong> the LiF(110) surface following homoepitaxial growth <strong>of</strong> LiFat T = 350 ◦ C, deposition <strong>of</strong> t Au ≈ 5 nm <strong>of</strong> Au <strong>and</strong> annealing at T = 400 ◦ C. The ripplemorphology has a mean periodicity Λ ≈40 nm, <strong>and</strong> the formation <strong>of</strong> Au NPs slightlyelongated along the ridges direction after the annealing can be easily noticed.The experimental distribution <strong>of</strong> the NPs sizes were obtained by careful analysis <strong>of</strong>the AFM data. First, the NPs present in the images were isolated by the application<strong>of</strong> a threshold setting to separate them from the background. The NPs isolated by thisprocedure in a 1μm 2 AFM image, containing about one thous<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> particles, had theirperimeters fitted with sets <strong>of</strong> coherently aligned ellipses. The ellipses axes are then used

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!