<strong>Finance</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Administration</strong> Committee - V. Annual Report <strong>of</strong> the Treasurer, 2011 - Information3S TATE OF TENNESSEECOMPTROLLER OF THE TREASURYDEPARTMENT OF AUDITDIVISION OF STATE AUDITSUITE 1500JAMES K. POLK STATE OFFICE BUILDINGNASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 37243-1402PHONE (615) 401-7897FAX (615) 532-2765Independent Auditor’s ReportDecember 9, 2011<strong>The</strong> Honorable Bill Haslam, Governor<strong>and</strong>Members <strong>of</strong> the General AssemblyState Capitol, Nashville, Tennessee 37243<strong>and</strong>Mr. James E. Hall, ChairmanAudit Committee<strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Trustees</strong><strong>The</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996-0180<strong>and</strong>Dr. Joseph A. DiPietro, President<strong>The</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Tennessee, 800 Andy Holt Tower, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996-0180Ladies <strong>and</strong> Gentlemen:We have audited the accompanying basic financial statements <strong>of</strong> the <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Tennessee, which is a component unit <strong>of</strong> the State <strong>of</strong> Tennessee, as <strong>of</strong> <strong>and</strong> for the year ended June30, 2011, as listed in the table <strong>of</strong> contents. <strong>The</strong>se financial statements are the responsibility <strong>of</strong> the university’s management. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financialstatements, based on our audit. We did not audit the financial statements <strong>of</strong> the <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Chattanooga Foundation, Inc.; the <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Tennessee Foundation, Inc.; <strong>and</strong> the<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Tennessee Research Foundation, Inc., discretely presented component units <strong>of</strong> the university. Those financial statements were audited by other auditors whose reportsthereon have been furnished to us, <strong>and</strong> our opinion, ins<strong>of</strong>ar as it relates to the amounts included for the <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Chattanooga Foundation, Inc.; the <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> TennesseeFoundation, Inc.; <strong>and</strong> the <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Tennessee Research Foundation, Inc., is based on the reports <strong>of</strong> the other auditors.We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing st<strong>and</strong>ards generally accepted in the United States <strong>of</strong> America <strong>and</strong> the st<strong>and</strong>ards applicable to financial audits contained ingenerally accepted government auditing st<strong>and</strong>ards. Those st<strong>and</strong>ards require that we plan <strong>and</strong> perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statementsare free <strong>of</strong> material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts <strong>and</strong> disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includesassessing the accounting principles used <strong>and</strong> significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit<strong>and</strong> the reports <strong>of</strong> the other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.In our opinion, based on our audit <strong>and</strong> the reports <strong>of</strong> the other auditors, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position<strong>of</strong> the <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Tennessee <strong>and</strong> its discretely presented component units as <strong>of</strong> June 30, 2011, <strong>and</strong> the respective changes in financial position <strong>and</strong> cash flows for the year then endedin conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States <strong>of</strong> America.As explained in Note 2, the financial statements include investments valued at $361,231,003.85 (14.1 percent <strong>of</strong> net assets), whose fair values have been estimated by managementin the absence <strong>of</strong> readily determinable fair values. Management’s estimates are based on information provided by the fund managers or the general partners.<strong>The</strong> management’s discussion <strong>and</strong> analysis <strong>and</strong> the schedule <strong>of</strong> funding progress are not a required part <strong>of</strong> the basic financial statements but are supplementary information requiredby accounting principles generally accepted in the United States <strong>of</strong> America. We have applied certain limited procedures, which consisted principally <strong>of</strong> inquiries <strong>of</strong> managementregarding the methods <strong>of</strong> measurement <strong>and</strong> presentation <strong>of</strong> the required supplementary information. However, we did not audit the information <strong>and</strong> express no opinion on it.Our audit was conducted for the purpose <strong>of</strong> forming opinions on the basic financial statements. <strong>The</strong> schedules <strong>and</strong> charts presented outside <strong>of</strong> the basic financial statements arepresented for purposes <strong>of</strong> additional analysis <strong>and</strong> are not a required part <strong>of</strong> the basic financial statements. Such information has not been subjected to the auditing procedures appliedin the audit <strong>of</strong> the basic financial statements, <strong>and</strong>, accordingly, we express no opinion on it.In accordance with generally accepted government auditing st<strong>and</strong>ards, we have also issued our report dated December 9, 2011, on our consideration <strong>of</strong> the university’s internal controlover financial reporting <strong>and</strong> our tests <strong>of</strong> its compliance with certain provisions <strong>of</strong> laws, regulations, contracts, <strong>and</strong> grant agreements <strong>and</strong> other matters. <strong>The</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> that report isto describe the scope <strong>of</strong> our testing <strong>of</strong> internal control over financial reporting <strong>and</strong> compliance <strong>and</strong> the results <strong>of</strong> that testing, <strong>and</strong> not to provide an opinion on the internal controlover financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part <strong>of</strong> an audit performed in accordance with generally accepted government auditing st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> should beconsidered in assessing the results <strong>of</strong> our audit.Sincerely,Arthur A. Hayes, Jr., CPADirectorAAH/sds335
<strong>Finance</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Administration</strong> Committee - V. Annual Report <strong>of</strong> the Treasurer, 2011 - InformationManagement’s Discussion<strong>and</strong> Analysis3This section <strong>of</strong> the <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Tennessee’s annual financial report presentsa discussion <strong>and</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> the financial performance <strong>of</strong> the university duringthe fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, with comparative information presentedfor the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010. This discussion has been prepared bymanagement along with the financial statements <strong>and</strong> related note disclosures <strong>and</strong>should be read in conjunction with the Independent Auditor’s Report, the auditedfinancial statements, <strong>and</strong> the accompanying notes. <strong>The</strong> financial statements,notes, <strong>and</strong> this discussion are the responsibility <strong>of</strong> management.<strong>The</strong> university is component unit <strong>of</strong> the State <strong>of</strong> Tennessee <strong>and</strong> an integral part<strong>of</strong> the state’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). <strong>The</strong> financialreporting entity for the financial statements is comprised <strong>of</strong> the university <strong>and</strong>three component units. <strong>The</strong> component units are discretely presented based onthe nature <strong>and</strong> significance <strong>of</strong> their relationship to the university. <strong>The</strong> reader mayrefer to Note 1 for detailed information on the financial reporting entity.Using This Annual ReportThis report consists <strong>of</strong> three basic financial statements. <strong>The</strong> statement <strong>of</strong> netassets; the statement <strong>of</strong> revenues, expenses, <strong>and</strong> changes in net assets; <strong>and</strong> thestatement <strong>of</strong> cash flows provide information on the <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Tennessee as awhole <strong>and</strong> present a long-term view <strong>of</strong> the university’s finances.THE STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS<strong>The</strong> statement <strong>of</strong> net assets presents the financial position <strong>of</strong> the university at theend <strong>of</strong> the fiscal year <strong>and</strong> includes all assets <strong>and</strong> liabilities <strong>of</strong> the university. <strong>The</strong>difference between total assets <strong>and</strong> total liabilities—net assets—is an indicator<strong>of</strong> the current financial condition <strong>of</strong> the university. Assets <strong>and</strong> liabilities aregenerally measured using current values. Capital assets, however, are stated athistorical cost less an allowance for depreciation.Net assets are divided into three major categories. <strong>The</strong> first category, investedin capital assets, net <strong>of</strong> related debt, provides the university’s equity in property,plant, <strong>and</strong> equipment owned by the university. <strong>The</strong> next asset category isrestricted net assets, which is divided into two categories, nonexpendable <strong>and</strong>expendable. <strong>The</strong> corpus <strong>of</strong> nonexpendable restricted resources is only availablefor investment purposes. Expendable restricted net assets are available forexpenditure by the university but must be spent for purposes as determined bydonors <strong>and</strong>/or external entities that have placed time or purpose restrictions onthe use <strong>of</strong> the assets. <strong>The</strong> final category is unrestricted net assets. Unrestrictednet assets are available to the university for any lawful purpose <strong>of</strong> the institution.See Table 1 (opposite page).<strong>The</strong> university had the following significant changes between fiscal years on thestatement <strong>of</strong> net assets:Current assets increased between fiscal years due to increases in investments <strong>and</strong>the current portion <strong>of</strong> accounts, notes, <strong>and</strong> grants receivable. <strong>The</strong> most significantincrease is attributable to the portion <strong>of</strong> grants receivable deemed current.Noncurrent assets <strong>of</strong> cash <strong>and</strong> cash equivalents, investments, <strong>and</strong> capital assetsincreased between the fiscal years. Cash <strong>and</strong> cash equivalents increased due to achanging investment mix to adjust to activity in the capital markets. Investments36