Certain Electric Power Tools, Battery Cartridges, and ... - USITC

specifically the witness statement of Makita'sdesign expert, Mr,Bartlett, and Makita's response to Interrogatory 11 of the CommissionInvestigative Staff which was annexed to Mr. Hattori's witness statement,(Margolis, Tr, 3032; Unopposed RPF 265).150. Mr. Bartlett testified that the overall width and length of thepads on Makita's cordless finishing sanders are an observable difference,but are not a distinctive feature. (Bartlett, Tr. 1962; CXA 776 at I;Unopposed SPF D21).151. Mr. Bartlett testified that the location of the handle onMakita's 3/8" drills is not a distinctive feature. (Bartlett, Tr. 1963;CXA 776 at 4; Unopposed SPF D22).152. Mr. Bartlett testified that the bearing sizes, locations, moldmarkings on the base plate and specific length and width of the pad ofUita's palm sanders are not distinctive features. (Bartlett, Tr. 1963;CXA 776, at 4; Unopposed SPF D23).153. Mr. Bartlett testified that neither the cut-off wheel size northe dimensions and color of the wheel guard of Hakita's 4" sander-grinderare distinctive.(Bartlett, Tr. 1963-64; CXA 776, at 5: Unopposed SPFD24).154. The molded feet on Makita's battery chargers are notdistinctive features. (Bartlett, Tr. 1965-66; Griffin, Tr. 509; Qu 776,at 9; Unoppo'sea SPF D25).155. The terminal arrangment of one of Black and Decker's batterycartridges is the same in outer appearance as Makita's battery cartridge.(Cahill, Tr. 1666-67; RXP 250B; Unopposed SPF D26).51