12.07.2015 Views

Certain Electric Power Tools, Battery Cartridges, and ... - USITC

Certain Electric Power Tools, Battery Cartridges, and ... - USITC

Certain Electric Power Tools, Battery Cartridges, and ... - USITC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5. 4" Disc (S<strong>and</strong>er) Grinders389. The 4" disc grinder of Respondents Jepson/( C , Model No.4204N, is somewhat similar to the Makita 4" disc grinder, except for theshape of the head <strong>and</strong> the color of the rear portion of the housing.(Compare CPX 42 with CPX 169).However, the non-respondent competitorproducts in evidence also bear great resemblance in the shape of the bodyhousing to the Makita disc grinder. (Compare CPX 114, 120, 146 <strong>and</strong> 162).Moreover the head of the Jepson,' ( c )model more nearly resembles thehead of the Ryobi disc grinder. (CPX 162). I find that the Jepson( c )model would infringe complainants' color mark, if such were established,but would not infringe any claimed design mark.390. The Jepson/ ( C 1 disc grinder is also sold in the United Statesby ( C (Unopposed CPF 43 (1):CPX 88, Supplemental Exs. 5 <strong>and</strong> 6 to the Complaint).391. The Jepson,' ( c ) disc grinder is also sold in the United StatesbY ( C ) (Unopposed CPF 43(5); CPX 88, Supplemental Ex. 44to the Complaint).392. Respondent Alltrade's 4" s<strong>and</strong>er grinder, Model No. 1921-S-4, isidentical to the Jepson/ ( c ) model. (CPX 196). It would thus alsoinfringe the claimed color nyrk.393. The 4" grinder of respondent Central Purchasing d/b/a HarborFreight, Hodel No. 1089, is also identical to the ( C ) model.(CPX 192).It would thus also infringe the claimed color mark.394. The 4" disc grinder of respondent Jet Equipment, Model Nos. JEG400<strong>and</strong> JEG 400HG are similar in design to the Jepson?( c ) model, except117

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!