Certain Electric Power Tools, Battery Cartridges, and ... - USITC

addition to Marcia H. Sundeen, Esq. (53 Fed. Reg. 37879, Sept. 28, 1988).By notice dated, November 4, 1988, George G. Summerfield, Jr., Esq., andGary Hnath, Esq., were designated the Commission Investigative Attorneys inthis investigation. (53 Fed. Reg. 45399, Nov. 9, 1988).By Initial Determination filed December 14, 1988, the Administrative LawJudge granted the motion of Robert Bosch Power Tool Corporation ("Bosch")to interveiie in the investigation.(Order No. 26). The Commission did notreview that Initial Determination. (Notice, Janaury 31, 1989).By Initial Determination filed March 6, 1989, the Administrative LawJudge granted the joint motion of complainants and respondent Bosch fortermination of the investigation as to respondent Bosch on the basis of asettlement agreement. (Order No 831..By Order No. 84, dated March 3, 1989, the Administrative Law Judgeissued an Initial Determination designating this matter more complicatedand extending the administrative deadline for filing his InitialDetermination on the issues herein until June 2, 1989.By Initial Determination dated March 8, 1989, the Administrative LawJudge found respondents Honworld International, Inc.;Homegene Corp.;Famous Overseas Corporation; New Golden Star Electric Works, Ltd.;andJiang Charng Machinery Workds, to be in default in this investigation.(Order No. 85).The Comission decided not to review Orders No. 83, 84 and 85.(54 Fed.Reg. 16009, Apr. 20, 19891..By Order No. 70, dated February 17, 1989, respondents Ace Tool Company,Pay N' Pak,Nestor Sales Corporation and Union Tech Corporation wereordered to show cause on or before March 1, 1989 as to why they should not6